Towards an ontology for psychosis

Cognitive Systems Research

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 42-52

  Harris, Jonathan ^b   Lawrie, Stephen ^b   Martone, Maryann ^c  

^a Subbarao)   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification systems; Data integration; DSM IV; ICD 10; Interoperability; Knowledge representation in psychiatry; Psychosis ontology

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHODS; CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION; DATA INTEGRATION; DATA INTEROPERABILITY; DSM-IV; ICD-10; INTERCONVERSIONS; MENTAL HEALTH; PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA HANDLING; FORMAL METHODS; INTEROPERABILITY; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

ONTOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE; KNOWLEDGE; METHODOLOGY; ONTOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSIS; RATING SCALE; SCHIZOPHRENIA;

EID: 77953617817     PISSN: 13890417     EISSN: 13890417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ainsworth, J., Harper, R., Juma, I., & Buchan, I. (2006). PsyGrid: Applying e-science to epidemiology. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE symposium on computer-based medical systems (pp. 727-732).
2. Amann, B., Beeri, C., Fundulaki, I., & Scholl, M. (2002). Ontology-based integration of xml web resources. In Proceedings of the 1st international semantic web conference (ISWC 2002) (pp. 117-131).
3. Antonova E., Kumari V., Morris R., Halari R., Anilkumar A., Mehrotra R., et al. The relationship of structural alterations to cognitive deficits in Schizophrenia: A voxel-based morphometry study. Biological Psychiatry 2005, 58(6):457-467.
4. Ashburner M., Ball C., Blake J., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J., et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nature Genetics 2000, 25(1):25-29.
5. The description logic handbook 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider (Eds.).
6. Beale, T. (2002). Archetypes: Constraint-based domain models for future-proof information systems. In OOPSLA-2002 workshop on behavioural semantics. http://www.oceaninformatics.biz/publications/archetypes-new.pdf.
7. Broome M. Taxonomy and ontology in psychiatry: A survey of recent literature. Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 2006, 13(4):303.
8. Cimino J. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods of Information in Medicine 1998, 37(4-5):394-403.
9. Cooper R. What is wrong with the DSM?. History of Psychiatry 2004, 15(1):5.
10. Dolin R., Alschuler L., Boyer S., Beebe C., Behlen F., Biron P., et al. HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006, 13(1):30-39.
11. DSM, I. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association, 527-528.
12. First, M., Spitzer, R., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. (1995). Structured clinical interview for dsm-iv axis i disorders.
13. Geddes, J., Lloyd, S., Simpson, A., Rossor, M., Fox, N., et al. (2005). NeuroGrid: using grid technology to advance neuroscience. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE symposium on computer-based medical systems (pp. 570-572).
14. Haslam N. Kinds of kinds. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 2002, 9:203-217.
15. Hayes, P., Eskridge, T., Saavedra, R., Reichherzer, T., Mehrotra, M., Bobrovnikoff, D. (2005). Collaborative knowledge capture in ontologies. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge capture (pp. 99-106).
16. Horridge, M., Drummond, N., Goodwin, J., Rector, A., Stevens, R., & Wang, H. (2006). The Manchester OWL syntax. In Proceedings of the OWL experiences and directions workshop (OWLED'06) at the ISWC 6.
17. Horrocks, I., & Patel-Schneider, P. (2001). The generation of daml+oil. In Description logics 2001 (DL2001) (pp. 30-35).
18. Jablensky A., Kendell R. Criteria for assessing a classification in psychiatry. Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification 2002, 11-34.
19. Kaufman J., Charney D. Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety 2000, 12(s 1):69-76.
20. Kay S., Fiszbein A., Opler L. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1987, 13(2):261-276.
21. Kendler K., Karkowski L., Walsh D. The structure of psychosis: Latent class analysis of probands from the roscommon family study. Archives of General Psychiatry 1998, 55(6):492.
22. Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R., Noy, N., & Musen, M. (2004). The Protégé OWL plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In Third international semantic web conference (pp. 229-243).
23. Kohler J., Philippi S., Lange M. Semeda: ontology based semantic integration of biological databases. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(18):2420-2427.
24. Lawrie S., Abukmeil S. Brain abnormality in schizophrenia. A systematic and quantitative review of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging studies. The British Journal of Psychiatry 1998, 172(2):110.
25. Mcguffin P., Farmer A., Harvey I. A polydiagnostic application of operational criteria in studies of psychotic illness: Development and reliability of the opcrit system. Archives of General Psychiatry 1991, 48(8):764-770.
26. Mineka S., Watson D., Clark L. Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annual Review of Psychology 1998, 49(1):377-412.
27. Noy N.F., Sintek M., Decker S., Crubezy M., Fergerson R.W., Musen M.A. Creating semantic web contents with protege-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2001, 16(2):60-71.
28. Patel-Schneider, P. F., Hayes, P., & Horrocks, I. (2004). Owl web ontology language: Semantics and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation, 10.
29. Qamar, R., Kola., J., & Rector, A. (2007). Unambiguous data modeling to ensure higher accuracy term binding to clinical terminologies. In AMIA annual symposium proceedings (in print).
30. Qamar R., Rector A. Semantic issues in integrating data from different models to achieve data interoperability. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2007, 129(1):674.
31. Rector, A., Marley, T., & Qamar, R. (in press). Models of meaning and models of use: binding terminologies to the ehr - An approach using owl. In AMIA annual symposium (AMIA 2006). Henley and Belfus, Washington, DC.
32. Rector, A., & Nowlan, W. (1993). The galen representation and integration language (grail) kernel, version 1. Deliverable 6, The GALEN Consortium for the EC AIM Programme (Available from Medical Informatics Group, University of Manchester).
33. Stoeckert C., Parkinson H. The mged ontology: A framework for describing functional genomics experiments. Comparative and Functional Genomics 2003, 4(1):127-132.
34. WHO (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. World Health Organization, ISBN 9241544554.
35. Ure J., Procter R., Martone M., Porteous D., Lloyd S., Lawrie S., et al. Data integration in eHealth: A domain/disease specific roadmap. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2007, 126:144.
36. Üstün T., Chatterji S., Andrews G. International classifications and the diagnosis of mental disorders: Strengths, limitations and future perspectives. Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification 2002.
37. Wache, H., Vögele, T., Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G., Neumann, H., & Hübner, S. (2001). Ontology-based integration of information-a survey of existing approaches. In IJCAI-01 workshop: ontologies and information sharing (pp. 108-117).
38. Wakefield J. The concept of mental disorder. On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist 1992, 47(3):373-388.
39. Wakefield, J., & First, M. (2003). Clarifying the distinction between disorder and nondisorder: Confronting the overdiagnosis (false-positives) problem in DSM-V, Advancing DSM: dilemmas in psychiatric diagnosis, 23-55.
40. Wing J., Cooper J., Sartorius N. Present state examination 1974, Cambridge University Press.