Rapid sequence spinal anaesthesia for category-1 urgency caesarean section: A case series

Anaesthesia

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 664-669

  Kinsella, S M ^a   Girgirah, K ^a   Scrutton, M J L ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; FENTANYL;

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FETUS HEART RATE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; MORBID OBESITY; NERVE BLOCK; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN; PARITY; RISK FACTOR; SPINAL ANESTHESIA;

ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; CESAREAN SECTION; EMERGENCIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77953561355     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06368.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Shibli KU, Russell IF. A survey of anaesthetic techniques used for caesarean section in the UK in 1997. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2000 9: 160 167.
2. Kinsella SM. A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 caesarean sections. Anaesthesia 2008 63: 822 832.
3. Scrutton M, Kinsella SM. The immediate caesarean section: rapid-sequence spinal and risk of infection. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2003 12: 143 144.
4. Scrutton M, Kinsella M. Obstetrics. In: Allman KG, McIndoe AK, Wilson IH, eds. Emergencies in Anaesthesia, 2nd edn.
5. Thurlow J, Kinsella SM. Intra-uterine resuscitation: active management of fetal distress. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2002 11: 105 116.
6. Kinsella SM, Gardner IC, Harvey N, Scrutton MJL, Shutt LE. Assessing regional blocks before caesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2006 15: 340 341.
7. Thomas J, Paranjothy S. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report.
8. Shroff R, Thompson ACD, McCrum A, Rees SGO. Prospective multidisciplinary audit of obstetric general anaesthesia in a District General Hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004 24: 641 646.
9. Tuffnell DJ, Wilkinson K, Beresford N. Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? British Medical Journal 2001 322: 1330 1333.
10. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy: 7th Annual Report.
11. Good Practice in the Management of Continuous Epidural Analgesia in the Hospital Setting.
12. Naik M, Mannakkara C, Aravindham N. National postal survey of methods used to ensure aseptic whilst performing regional analgesia and anaesthesia in obstetrics. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2008 17: S27.
13. Benhamou B, Mercier FJ, Dounas M. Hospital policy for prevention of infection after neuraxial blocks in obstetrics. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2002 11: 265 269.
14. Smith N. Differences in spinal anaesthesia techniques. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2003 12: 308.
15. Umbilical Cord Prolapse: Green-top Guideline No. 50.
16. o table tilt vs. left lateral. Anaesthesia 2002 57: 15 20.
17. Mendonca C, Griffiths J, Ateleanu B, Collis RE. Hypotension following combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: left lateral position vs. tilted supine position. Anaesthesia 2003 58: 428 431.
18. Lewis NL, Ritchie EL, Downer JP, Nel MR. Left lateral versus supine wedged position for development of block after combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia 2004 59: 894 898.
19. Caesarean Section: Clinical Guideline. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health; commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
20. Kiran S, Singal NK. A comparative study of three different doses of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in elective caesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2002 11: 185 189.
21. Portnoy D, Vadhera RB. Mechanisms and management of an incomplete epidural block for cesarean section. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America 2003 21: 39 57.
22. Ismail S, Huda A. An observational study of anaesthesia and surgical time in elective caesarean section: spinal compared with general anaesthesia. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2009 18: 352 355.
23. Lansbury A, Lyons G. Time taken to perform spinal anaesthesia in emergency caesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2002 11: S12.
24. Gunka VB, Douglas MJ. Spinal and general anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section: how fast are we? Anesthesiology 2001 94: A85.
25. Sodhi M, Tamilselvan P, Fernando R, Venkatesh S. How obstetric anaesthetists test the quality of regional anaesthetic block before caesarean section: a national survey. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2005 14: S8.
26. Russell IF. A comparison of cold, pinprick and touch for assessing the level of spinal block at caesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2004 13: 146 152.
27. Stoneham M, Eldridge J, Popat M, Russell R. Oxford positioning technique improves haemodynamic stability and predictability of block height of spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1999 8: 242 248.
28. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, James D. National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section. British Medical Journal 2004 328: 665 669.
29. Imran Kayani S, Walkinshaw SA, Preston C. Pregnancy outcome in severe placental abruption. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003 110: 679 683.
30. Schmidt WA, Affleck JA, Jacobson SL. Fatal fetal haemorrhage and placental pathology. Report of three cases and a new setting. Placenta 2005 26: 419 431.
31. Prabulos AM, Philipson EH. Umbilical cord prolapse. Is the time from diagnosis to delivery critical? Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1998 43: 129 132.
32. Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002 186: 311 314.
33. Siassakos D, Hasafa Z, Sibanda T, et al. Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009 116: 1089 1096.