Bridging the chasm between management education, research, and practice: Moving towards the ‘grounded theory’ approach

Vikalpa

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-18

  Maital, Shlomo ^a   Prakhya, Srinivas ^b   Seshadri, D V R ^b  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT BANGALORE   (India)

Author keywords

Action learning; Balanced scorecard; Case study method; Grounded theory; Innovation action research; Management educator researcher scientist practitioner; Phenomenological and positivist approaches

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953555325     PISSN: 02560909     EISSN: 23953799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0256090920080101     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson, J C and Narus, J A (2004). Business Market Management: Understanding, Creating and Delivering Value, Upper Saddle River, NJ USA: Pearson Publishing.
2. Atlas, J (1999). “The Million Dollar Diploma,” The New Yorker, July 19, 42-51.
3. Auerbach, Carl P; Salick, Elizabeth and Fine, Jacqueline (2006). “Using Grounded Theory to Develop Treatment Strategies for Multi contextual Trauma,” Professional Psychology: Research Practice, 37(4), 367-373.
4. Collins, Jim (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don’t, New York: Harper Collins.
5. 2 Institute.
6. de Wit, Bob and Meyer, Ron (2005). Strategy: Process, Content and Context, Mason OH: Southwestern College Publishers.
7. Drucker, Peter (1994). “The Theory of the Business,” Harvard Business Review, 72(5), 95-104.
8. Eisenhardt, K M (1989). “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
9. Gelso, Charles G (2006). “On the Making of a Scientist–Practitioner: A Theory of Research Training in Professional Psychology,” Training and Education in Professional Psychology, S(1), 3-16.
10. Glaser, B and Strauss, A (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co.
11. Gordon, R (1998). “Balancing Real-world Problems with Real-World Results,” Phi Delta Kappan, 79, May, 390-393.
12. Haig, Brian D (1995). “Grounded Theory as Scientific Method,” University of Canterbury. University of Illinois: Philosophy of Education, http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-yearbook/95_docs/haig.html
13. John Deere Component Works (1987). Harvard Business School Case No. 9-187-107 by Artemis March and Robert Kaplan.
14. Kaplan, Robert (1998). “Innovation Action Research: Creating New Management Theory and Practice,” Journal Management Accounting Research, 10, 89-118.
15. Kaplan, Robert (1994). Essay, In: The Relevance of a Decade: Essays to Mark the First Ten Years of Harvard Business School Press, ed. By Paula Barker Duffy, Boston, MA: HBS Press, 179-182.
16. Kaplan, Robert and Norton, David (1992). “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
17. Locke, Karen D (2000). Grounded Theory in Management Research, London and Delhi: Sage Publications Ltd.
18. Prahalad, C K and Gary Hamel (1990). “The Core Competence of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review, May-June, 68(3), 79-91.
19. Raimy, V (Ed.) (1950). Training in Clinical Psychology, New York: Prentice Hall.
20. Rice, Charles (1997). “The Scientist-Practitioner Split and the Future of Psychology,” American Psychologist, 52(11), 1173-1181.
21. Ricks, D (1994). “Two Lies Trainers Live By,” Training, 31(11), 82-82.
22. Simon, H (1991). “The Scientist as Problem Solver” Afterword in Models of My Life, New York: Basic Books.
23. Stickler, George (1997). “Are Science and Practice Commensurable?” American Psychologist, 52(4), 442-448.
24. Strauss, A and Corbin, Juliet (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park: SAGE.