To collaborate to better learn an animation;Collaborer pour mieux apprendre d'une animation

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 264, Issue , 2005, Pages 171-176

  Rebetez, Cyril ^a   Bétrancourt, Mireille ^a   Sangin, Mirweis ^b   Dillenbourg, Pierre ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

animation; collaboration; comprehension; learning; multimedia

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX MATERIALS; DEEP LEARNING; DYNAMIC PRESENTATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; INDIVIDUAL LEARNING; MULTIMEDIA ANIMATION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

ANIMATION;

EID: 77953552272     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1148550.1148572     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bétrancourt, M. and B. Tversky, Effect of computer animation on user's performance: a review. Le travail humain, 2000. 63(4): p. 311-330.
2. Bétrancourt, M., J. Bauer-Morrison, and B. Tversky, Les animations sont-elles vraiment plus efficaces? Revue d'intelligence artificielle, 2001. 14(1-2): p. 149-166.
3. Dillenbourg, P., What do you mean by collaborative learning ?, in Collaborative-learning: cognitive and conceptual approaches, P. Dillenbourg, Editor. 1999, Elsevier: Oxford. p. 1-19.
4. Lowe, R.K., Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 2003. 13: p. 157-176.
5. Lowe, R.K., Interrogation of a dynamic visualisation during learning. Learning and Instruction, 2004. 14: p. 257-274.
6. Mandl, H. and R. Levin, Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. Advances in Psychology, ed. G.E. Stelmach and P.A. Vroon. 1989, Amsterdam: Noth holland.
7. Mayer, E.R., Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 1989. 59(1): p. 43-64.
8. Mayer, E.R., Multimedia learning. 2001, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Narayanan, N.H. and M. Hegarty, Multimedia design for comnuication of dynamic information. International journal of human-computer studies, 2002. 57: p. 279-315.
10. Pane, J.F., A.T. Corbett, and B.E. John. Assessing dynamics in computer-based instructions. in CHI. 1996.
11. Rieber, L.P., M. Boyce, and C. Assad, The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks. journal of Computer Based Instruction, 1990. 17: p. 46-52.
12. Schnotz, W., Sign systems, technologies and the acquisition of knowledge, in Multimedia learning: cognitive and instructional issues, J.F. Rouet, J.J. Levonen, and A. Biardeau, Editors. 2001, Elsevier: Amsterdam. p. 9-29.
13. Schwan, S. and R. Riempp, The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 2004. 14(3): p. 293-305.
14. Sweller, J. and P. Chandler, Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 1994. 12(185-233).
15. Sweller, J., J.J.G. van Merrienboer, and F.G.W.C. Paas, Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 1998. 10(3): p. 251-296.
16. Sweller, J., Evolution of human cognitive architecture, in The psychology of learning and motivation, B.H. Ross, Editor. 2003, Academic Press: New-York. p. 215-266.