Les animations sont-elles vraiment plus efficaces ?

Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle

Volumn 14, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 149-166

  Betrancourt, Mireille ^a   Bauer Morrison, Julie ^b   Tversky, Barbara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer animation; Guidelines for designers; Multimedia instructions; Users' performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041783806     PISSN: 0992499X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. [BAE 88] BAEK Y. K., LAYNE B. H., "Color, graphics, and animation in a computer-assisted learning tutorial lesson", Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, Vol. 15, 1988, p. 131-135.
2. [BIE 84] BIEGER G. R., GLOCK M. D., "The information content of picture-text instructions " Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 53, 1984/1985, 68-76.
3. [BET in press] BETRANCOURT M., TVERSKY, B., "Simple animations for organizing diagrams ", International Journal of Human Computer Studies, in press.
4. [CAR 81] CARAMAZZA A., MCCLOSKEY M., GREEN B., "Naive beliefs in "sophisticated" subjects: Misconceptions about trajectories of objects", Cognition, Vol. 9, 1981, p. 117-123.
5. [CHA 98] CHANLIN L-J., "Animation to teach students of different knowledge levels", Journal of Instructional Psychology, Vol. 25, 1998, p. 166-175.
6. [DEN 96] DENIS M., "Imagery and the description of spatial configurations" In M. De Vega, M.J. Intons-Peterson, P.N. Johnson-Laird, M. Denis & M. Marschark, Models of visuospatial cognition New york: Oxford University press, 1996, p. 128-197.
7. [DWY 78] DWYER F. M., Strategies for improving visual learning, State College, PA: Learning Services, 1978.
8. [DYC 95] DYCK, J. L., "Problem solving by novice Macintosh users: The effects of animated, self-paced written, and no instruction", Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 12, 1995, p. 29-49.
9. [FER 95] FERGUSON E. L., HEGARTY M., "Learning with real machines or diagrams: Application of knowledge to realworld problems", Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 13, p. 129-160.
10. [FRE 94] FREYD J. J., JONES K. T., "Representational momentum for a spiral path ", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1994, p. 968-976.
11. [GEL 63] GELB I., A study of writing (2nd ed.), Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1963.
12. [HAR 95] HARRISON S. M., "A comparison of still, animated, or nonillustrated on-line help with written or spoken instructions in a graphical user interface", In I. R. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M. B. Rosson, & J. Nielsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO: ACM, 1995, p. 82-89.
13. [HEG 92] HEGARTY M., "Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 18, 1992, p. 1084-1102.
14. [HEG 90] HEGARTY M., CARPENTER P.A., JUST M.A. "Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts", In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal and P.D. Pearson (Eds.) Handbook of reading research, New York : Longman, 1990, p. 641-668.
15. [HEG 99] HEGARTY M., QUILICI J., NARAYANAN N. H., HOLMQUIST S. MORENO R., "Multimedia Instruction: Lessons from Evaluation of a Theory-based Design ", Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol. 2, no 8, p. 119-150.
16. [KAI 92] KAISER M. K., PROFFITT D. R., WHELAN S. M., HECHT H., "Influence of animation on dynamical judgments", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 18, p. 669-690.
17. [KIE 92] KIERAS D. E., "Diagrammatic displays for engineered systems: Effects on human performance in interacting with malfunctioning systems", International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 36, pp. 861-895.
18. [LAR 96] LARGE A., BEHESHTI J., BREULEUX A., RENAUD A., "The effect of animation in enhancing descriptive and procedural texts in a multimedia learning environment", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 47, p. 437-448.
19. [LAR 87] LARKIN J. H., SIMON H. A., "Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words" Cognitive Science, Vol. 11, 1987, p. 65-99.
20. [LEE 97] LEE S., "The effects of computer animation and cognitive style on the understanding and retention of scientific explanation", Unpublished manuscript, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University at Blacksburg, 1997.
21. [LEV 82] LEVIE W. H., LENTZ R., "Effects of text illustrations: A review of research", Educational Communication and Technology Journal, Vol. 30, 1982, p. 195-232.
22. [LEV 93] LEVIN J. R., MAYER R. E., "Understanding illustrations in text", In B. K. Britton, A. Woodward, and M. Binkley (Eds.), Learning from Textbooks: Theory and Practice (pp. 95-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993.
23. [MAN 89] MANDL A., LEVIN J., Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures, Amsterdam: NorthHolland, 1989.
24. [MAY 89] MAYER R. E., « Models for understanding. », Review of Educational Research, Vol. 59, no1, p. 43-64.
25. [MCC 83] MCCLOSKEY M., "Naive theories of motion", In D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299-324). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
26. [PAL 91] PALMITER S. L., ELKERTON J., BAGGETT P., "Animated demonstrations vs. written instructions for learning procedural tasks: A preliminary investigation", International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 34, 1991, p. 687-701.
27. [PAL 93] PALMITER S., ELKERTON J., "Animated demonstrations for learning procedural computer-based tasks", Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 8, 1993, p. 193-216.
28. [PAN 96a] PANE J. F., CORBETT A. T., JOHN B. E., "Assessing dynamics in computer-based instruction", In M. J. Tauber (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems., Vancouver: ACM, 1996, p. 797-804.
29. [PAN 96b] PANI J. R., JEFFRES J. A., SHIPPEY G. T., SCHWARTZ K. T., "Imagining projective transformations: Aligned orientations in spatial organization", Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 31, 1996, p. 125-167.
30. [PAR 92] PARK O.C., GITTELMAN S. S., "Selective use of animation and feedback in computer-based instruction", Educational Technology, Research, and Development, Vol. 40, 1992, p. 27-38.
31. [PAY 92] PAYNE S. J., CHESWORTH L., HILL E., "Animated demonstrations for exploratory learners", Interacting with Computers, Vol. 4, no1, p. 3-22.
32. [PEE 93] PEEK J., "Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text", Learning and Instruction, Vol. 3, 1993, p. 227-238
33. [PEL 00] PELLEGRIN A., Traitement cognitif des représentations graphiques synoptiques, Thèse de doctorat, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, 2000.
34. [RIE 88] RIEBER L. P., HANNAFIN M.J., "Effects of textual and animated orienting activities and practice on learning from computer-based instruction", Computers in the Schools, Vol. 5, 1988, p. 77-89.
35. [RIE 89] RIEBER L. P., "The effects of computer animated elaboration strategies and practice on factual and application learning in an elementary science lesson", Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 5, 1989, p. 431-444.
36. [RIE 90a] RIEBER L. P., "Using computer animated graphics with science instruction with children", Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82, 1990, p. 135-140.
37. [RIE 90b] RIEBER L. P., BOYCE M. J., ASSAD C., "The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks", Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, Vol. 17, 1990, p. 46-52.
38. [RIE 91a] RIEBER L. P., "Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation", Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 83, 1991, p. 318-328.
39. [RIE 91b] RIEBER L. P., "Effects of visual grouping strategies of computer-animated presentations on selective attention in science", Educational Technology, Research, and Development, Vol. 39, 1991, p. 5-15.
40. [ROH 86] ROHR G., "Using visual concepts", in S.K. Chang, T. Ichikawa & P.A. Ligomenides (Eds.), Visual Languages, New York : Plenum Press, 1986, p 325-348.
41. [SCH 94] SCHNOTZ W., KULHAVY R. W., Comprehension of graphics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994.
42. [SCH 96] SCHWARTZ D. L., BLACK, J. B., "Analog imagery in mental model reasoning: Depictive models", Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 30, 1996, p. 154-219.
43. [SCH 99] SCHWARTZ D. L., "Physical imagery: Kinematic vs. dynamic models", Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 38, 1999, p. 433-464.
44. [THO 90] THOMPSON S. V., RIDING R. J., "The effect of animated diagrams on the understanding of a mathematical demonstration in 11-to 14-year-old pupils", British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 60, 1990, p. 93-98.
45. [TUF 83] TUFTE E. R., The visual display of quantitative information, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 1983.
46. [TVE 95] TVERSKY B., "Cognitive origins of conventions", In F. T. Marchese (Ed.), Understanding images, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995, p. 29-53.
47. [TVE in press] TVERSKY B., "Spatial schemas in depictions", In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought, Cambridge: MIT Press, sous presse.