Sensitivity analysis for frictional contact problems in the augmented Lagrangian formulation

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 199, Issue 33-36, 2010, Pages 2165-2176

  Stupkiewicz, Stanisław ^a   Lengiewicz, Jakub ^a   Korelc, Jože ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Augmented Lagrangian method; Direct differentiation method; Frictional contact; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED LAGRANGIAN FORMULATIONS; AUGMENTED LAGRANGIAN METHODS; AUGMENTED LAGRANGIANS; CONTACT CONSTRAINT; CONTACT INTERACTION; DIRECT DIFFERENTIATION METHODS; FRICTIONAL CONTACT; FRICTIONAL CONTACT PROBLEMS; GENERAL CLASS; LARGE DEFORMATIONS; MULTI-BODY; NEWTON METHODS; NON-ITERATIVE; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; SMOOTHING TECHNIQUES; TIME INCREMENTS;

FRICTION; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 77953544351     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Acharjee S., Zabaras N. The continuum sensitivity method for the computational design of three-dimensional deformation processes. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 2006, 195:6822-6842.
2. Alart P., Curnier A. A mixed formulation for frictional contact problems prone to Newton like solution methods. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 1991, 92:353-375.
3. Antunez H.J., Kleiber M. Sensitivity of forming processes to shape parameters. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 1996, 137:189-206.
4. Bensoe M.P., Olhoff N., Sokolowski J. Sensitivity analysis of problems of elasticity with unilateral constraints. J. Struct. Mech. 1985, 13:201-222.
5. Bertsekas D.P. Nonlinear Programming 2003, Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA. 2nd edition.
6. Choi K.K., Kim N.H. Structural Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization 2005, vol. 1 and 2. Springer.
7. de Souza Neto E.A., Perić D., Dutko M., Owen D.R.J. Design of simple low order finite elements for large strain analysis of nearly incompressible solids. Int. J. Sol. Struct. 1996, 33:3277-3296.
8. Fancello E.A., Haslinger J., Feijoo R.A. Numerical comparison between two cost functions in contact shape optimization. Struct. Optimization 1995, 9:57-68.
9. Fourment L., Balan T., Chenot J.L. Optimal design for non-steady-state metal forming processes - II. Application of shape optimization in forging. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 1996, 39:51-65.
10. Haslinger J., Neittaanmaki P., Salmenjoki K. Sensitivity analysis for discretized unilateral plane elasticity problem. Finite Elem. Anal. Design 1992, 12:13-25.
11. Hilding D., Torstenfelt B., Klarbring A. A computational methodology for shape optimization of structures in frictionless contact. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 2001, 190:4043-4060.
12. Kim N.H., Choi K.K., Chen J.S., Park Y.H. Meshless shape design sensitivity analysis and optimization for contact problem with friction. Comp. Mech. 2000, 25:157-168.
13. Kim N.H., Park Y.H., Choi K.K. Optimization of a hyperelastic structure with multibody contact using continuum-based shape design sensitivity analysis. Struct. Multidisc. Optimization 2001, 21:196-208.
14. Klarbring A. Large displacement frictional contact: a continuum framework for finite element discretization. Eur. J. Mech. A Solids 1995, 14(2):237-253.
15. Kleiber M. Shape and non-shape structural sensitivity analysis for problems with any material and kinematic non-linearity. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 1993, 108:73-97.
16. Kleiber M., Antunez H., Hien T.D., Kowalczyk P. Parameter Sensitivity in Nonlinear Mechanics 1997, Wiley, Chichester.
17. Kleiber M., Sosnowski W. Parameter sensitivity analysis in frictional contact problems of sheet metal forming. Comp. Mech. 1995, 16:297-306.
18. Korelc J. Automatic generation of finite-element code by simultaneous optimization of expressions. Theor. Comp. Sci. 1997, 187:231-248.
19. Korelc J. Multi-language and multi-environment generation of nonlinear finite element codes. Engineering with Computers 2002, 18:312-327.
20. J. Korelc. AceGen and AceFEM user manuals. Available at , 2009. http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/Symech/.
21. Korelc J. Automation of primal and sensitivity analysis of transient coupled problems. Comp. Mech. 2009, 44:631-649.
22. Kowalczyk P. Sensitivity analysis in finite element computations of elastoplasticity. IFTR Reports 7/2006, Institute of Fundamental Technological Research (IPPT) 2006, Warsaw.
23. 1-continuous formulation for 3D finite deformation frictional contact. Comp. Mech. 2002, 29(1):27-42.
24. Laursen T.A. Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics 2002, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
25. Laursen T.A., Simo J.C. A continuum-based finite element formulation for the implicit solution of multibody, large deformation frictional contact problems. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 1993, 36(20):3451-3485.
26. Lengiewicz J., Stupkiewicz S., Korelc J., Rodic T. DDM-based sensitivity analysis and optimization for smooth contact formulations. Analysis and Simulation of Contact Problems, volume 27 of Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics 2006, 79-86. Springer. P. Wriggers, U. Nackenhorst (Eds.).
27. Mathematica 7.0, Wolfram Research Inc. http://www.wolfram.com.
28. Michaleris P., Tortorelli D.A., Vidal C.A. Tangent operators and design sensitivity formulations for transient non-linear coupled problems with applications to elastoplasticity. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 1994, 37:2471-2499.
29. Mróz Z., Haftka R. Design sensitivity analysis of non-linear structures in regular and critical states. Int. J. Sol. Struct. 1994, 31:2071-2098.
30. Nocedal J., Wright S.J. Numerical Optimization 2006, Springer, New York. 2nd edition.
31. G. Pietrzak. Continuum mechanics modelling and augmented Lagrangian formulation of large deformation frictional contact problems. PhD thesis, Lausanne, EPFL, 1997.
32. Pietrzak G., Curnier A. Large deformation frictional contact mechanics: continuum formulation and augmented Lagrangian treatment. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 1999, 177(3-4):351-381.
33. Puso M.A., Laursen T.A. A 3D contact smoothing method using Gregory patches. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 2002, 54:1161-1194.
34. Puso M.A., Laursen T.A. A mortar segment-to-segment frictional contact method for large deformations. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 2004, 193:4891-4913.
35. Simo J.C., Hughes T.J.R. Computational Inelasticity 1998, Springer-Verlag, New York.
36. Simo J.C., Laursen T.A. An augmented Lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction. Comp. Struct. 1992, 42:97-116.
37. Srikanth A., Zabaras N. Shape optimization and preform design in metal forming processes. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 2000, 190:1859-1901.
38. Stupkiewicz S. Extension of the node-to-segment contact element for surface-expansion-dependent contact laws. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 2001, 50:739-759.
39. Stupkiewicz S. Augmented Lagrangian formulation and sensitivity analysis of contact problems. COMPLAS 2003, VII International Conference on Computational Plasticity, CIMNE 2003, Barcelona,. proceedings on CD. E. Onate, D.R.J. Owen (Eds.).
40. Stupkiewicz S., Korelc J., Dutko M., Rodic T. Shape sensitivity analysis of large deformation frictional contact problems. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 2002, 191(33):3555-3581.
41. Tardieu N., Constantinescu A. On the determination of elastic coefficients from indentation experiments. Inverse Probl. 2000, 16:577-588.
42. Tsay J.J., Arora J.S. Nonlinear structural design sensitivity analysis for path dependent problems. Part I: General theory. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 1990, 81:183-208.
43. Wriggers P. Computational Contact Mechanics 2006, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York. 2nd edition.
44. Wriggers P., Simo J.C., Taylor R.L. Penalty and augmented lagrangian formulations for contact problems. Proceedings of the NUMETA Conference 1985, Balkema, Rotterdam. J. Middleton, G. Pande (Eds.).