A mortar segment-to-segment frictional contact method for large deformations

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 193, Issue 45-47, 2004, Pages 4891-4913

  Puso, Michael A ^a   Laursen, Tod A ^b  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact; Finite elements; Friction; Large deformation; Mortar method

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DEFORMATION; FRICTION;

FRICTIONAL CONTACT; NODE-ON-SEGMENT APPROACHES; OVER-CONSTRAINT;

MORTAR;

DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRICTION; SLIDING CONTACT;

EID: 6444231650     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Puso M.A. Laursen T.A. A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193 2004 601-629
2. Hallquist J.O. Goudreau G.L. Benson D.J. Sliding interfaces with contact-impact in large-scale Lagrangian computations Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 51 1985 107-137
3. P. Papadopoulos, R.L. Taylor, A mixed formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems, Technical Report UCB/SEMM Report 90/18, University of California at Berkeley, 1990
4. Brezzi F. Fortin M. Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods 1991 Springer-Verlag New York
5. B. Engelmann, Nike2d: user manual, Technical Report UCRL-MA-105413, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, 1991
6. Padmanabhan V. Laursen T.A. Surface smoothing procedure for large deformation contact analysis Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 37 2001 173-198
7. Wriggers P. Krstulovic-Opara L. On smooth finite element discretization for frictional contact problems Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 80 2000 77-80
8. Puso M.A. Laursen T.A. A 3d contact smoothing algorithm using Gregory patches Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 54 2002 1161-1194
9. Belytschko T. Daniel W.J.T. Ventura G. A monolithic smoothing-gap algorithm for contact-impact based on the signed distance function Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 55 2002 101-125
10. Zavarise G. Wriggers P. A segment-to-segment contact strategy Math. Comput. Model. 28 1998 497-515
11. Simo J.C. Wriggers P. Taylor R.L. A perturbed Lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 50 1985 163-180
12. Papadopoulos P. Taylor R.L. A mixed formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 50 1992 163-180
13. Bernardi C. Maday Y. Patera A.T. A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: the mortar element method In: Brezia H. Lions J.L. (Eds.) Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications 1992 13-51 Pitman and Wiley
14. Belgacem F.B. Hild P. Laborde P. Approximation of the unilateral contact problem by the mortar finite element method C R. Acad. Sci. 324 1997 123-127
15. Hild P. Numerical implementation of two nonconforming finite element methods for unilateral contact Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 184 2000 99-123
16. McDevitt T.W. Laursen T.A. A mortar-finite element formulation for frictional contact problems Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 48 2000 1525-1547
17. Kikuchi N. Oden J.T. Contact Problems in Elasticity: A Study of Variational Inequalities and Finite Element Methods 1988 SIAM Philadelphia
18. Simo J.C. Hughes T.J.R. Computational Inelasticity 1997 Springer-Verlag New York
19. Foley J. et al. Computer Graphics, Principles and Practice second ed. 1997 Addison-Wesley Reading
20. Cowper G.R. Gaussian quadrature formulas for triangles Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 7 1973 405-408