Appropriateness of plantar pressure measurement devices: A comparative technical assessment

Gait and Posture

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 141-144

  Giacomozzi, Claudia ^a  

^a ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accuracy; COP estimation; Pressure measurement devices; Pressure sensors; Technical assessment

Indexed keywords

ELASTOMER;

ACCURACY; AIR; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYSTERESIS; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; STANDARDIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOOT; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE TRANSDUCER;

FOOT; HUMANS; TRANSDUCERS, PRESSURE;

EID: 77953538917     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Putti A.B., Arnold G.P., Cochrane L.A., Abboud R.J. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed ST4 system. Gait Posture 2008, 27:501-505.
2. Hallemans A., De Clercq D., Van Dongen S., Aerts P. Changes in foot-function parameters during the first 5 months after the onset of independent walking: a longitudinal follow-up study. Gait Posture 2006, 23:142-148.
3. Cobb J., Claremont D.J. Transducers for foot pressure measurement: survey of recent development. Med Biol Eng Comput 1995, 33(4):525-532.
4. Roy K.J. Force, pressure and motion measurements in the foot: current concepts. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 1988, 5(3):491-508.
5. Lord M., Reynolds D.P., Hughes J.R. Foot pressure measurement: a review of clinical findings. J Biomed Eng 1986, 8(4):283-294.
6. Giacomozzi C., De Angelis G., Paolizzi M., Silvestri S., Macellari V. Pneumatic test device for the accurate assessment of pressure sensors. WC 2009, IFMBE proceedings 25/IX 2009, 319-322. O. Dössel, W.C. Schlegel (Eds.).
7. ®-x and Tekscan matscan plantar pressure measurement systems. Procs. ESM (Emed scientific meeting) 2008 2008.