'New' evidence for clinical practice guidelines: Should we search for 'preference evidence'?

Patient

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 71-77

  Krahn, Murray ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine; Patient preference

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NOTE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77953446660     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/11535370-000000000-00000     Document Type: Note

References (27)

1. Davis D, Goldman J, Palda V. Handbook on clinical practice guidelines. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Medical Association, 2007: 34
2. KrahnM,Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA 2008; 300 (4): 436-438 (Pubitemid 352040257)
3. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ 1999; 319 (7212): 731-734 (Pubitemid 29431525)
4. Volk RJ, Cass AR, Spann SJ. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med 1999; 8: 333-340
5. Sculpher M, Gafni A, Watt I. Shared treatment decision making in a collectively funded health care system: possible conflicts and some potential solutions. Soc Sci Med 2002; 54 (9): 1369-1377 (Pubitemid 34234847)
6. Florin D, Dixon J. Public involvement in health care. BMJ 2004; 328 (7432): 159-161 (Pubitemid 38117472)
7. Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst 2006; 4: 22 (Pubitemid 44961665)
8. Pagliari C, Topalian J. Consumer involvement in guideline development: an international survey of strategies and experiences. Guideline International Network Conference; 2007 Aug 22-25; Toronto (ON)
9. Dolan P, Tsuchiya A, Wailoo A. NICE's citizen's council: what do we ask them, and how? Lancet 2003; 362 (9387): 918-919 (Pubitemid 37130108)
10. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. CDR process [online]. Available from URL: http://www. cadth.ca/index.php/en/cdr/process [Accessed 2010 Feb 3]
11. Guidelines International Network [online]. Available from URL: http://www.g-i-n.net/index.cfm?fuseaction=fuseaction- 28&fusesubaction= article&documentid=74&articleID=199 [Accessed 2010 Mar 1]
12. Chong CA, Chen IJ, Naglie G, et al. How well do guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences? J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24 (8): 977-982
13. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12 (1): 18-23
14. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA 2009; 301 (8): 868-869
15. Umscheid CA. Should guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences? J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24 (8): 988-990
16. Alibhai SM, Naglie G, Nam R, et al. Do older men benefit from curative therapy of localized prostate cancer? J Clin Oncol 2003; 21 (17): 3318-3327 (Pubitemid 46606266)
17. Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989; 5: 559-575 (Pubitemid 20153102)
18. Krahn M, Ritvo P, Irvine J, et al. Patient and community preferences for outcomes in prostate cancer: implications for clinical policy. Med Care 2003; 41 (1): 153-164
19. Volk RJ, Cantor SB, Cass AR, et al. Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19 (4): 339-348 (Pubitemid 38530505)
20. Cantor SB, Volk RJ, Krahn MD, et al. Concordance of couples' prostate cancer screening recommendations from a decision analysis. Patient 2008; 1 (1): 11-19
21. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (12): 1250-1261 (Pubitemid 351439226)
22. Willener R, Hantikainen V. Individual quality of life following radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer. Urol Nurs 2005; 25 (2): 88-90, 95-100
23. Constantinescu F, Goucher S, Weinstein A, et al. Understanding why rheumatoid arthritis patient treatment preferences differ by race. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61 (4): 413-418
24. Tong A, Morton R, Howard K, et al. Adolescent experiences following organ transplantation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. J Pediatr 2009; 155 (4): 542-549
25. Van HL, Schoevers RA, Dekker J. Predicting the outcome of antidepressants and psychotherapy for depression: a qualitative, systematic review. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2008; 16 (4): 225-234
26. Detsky AS, Naglie G, Krahn MD, et al. Primer on medical decision analysis: part 1. Getting started. Med Decis Making 1997; 17 (2): 123-125
27. Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. ACP J Club 2002; 136 (2): A11-4