Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry

Clinical Ophthalmology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 341-344

  Salim, Sarwat ^a   Linn, Daniel J ^a   Echols II, James R ^a   Netland, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Applanation tonometer; Intraocular pressure; Noncontact tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; TONOMETER;

EID: 77953441851     PISSN: 11775467     EISSN: 11775483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chihara E. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:203-218.
2. Forbes M, Pico G Jr, Grolman B. A noncontact applanation tonometer. Description and clinical evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;91:134-140.
3. Abbasoglu OE, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:2193-2196.
4. Vernon SA. Non-contact tonometry in the postoperative eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989;73:247-249.
5. Hansen MK. Clinicial comparison of the XPERT non-contact tonometer and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1995;73:176-180.
6. Myers KJ, Lalle P, Litwak A, et al. XPERT NCT - a clinical evaluation. J Am Optom Assoc. 1990;61:863-869.
7. Murase H, Sawada A, Mochizuki K, et al. Effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measured with three different tonometers. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009;53:1-6.
8. Kakau, CET, Wilke K. On repeated tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1971;49:611-614.
9. Sponsel WE. Tonometry in question: can visual screening tests play a more decisive role in glaucoma diagnosis and management? Surv Ophthalmol. 1989;33:291-300.
10. Mundorf TK, Zimmerman TJ, Nardin GF, Kendall KS. Automated perimetry, tonometry, and questionnaire in glaucoma screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:505-508.
11. Tuck MW, Crick RP. The cost-effectiveness of various modes of screening for primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1997;4:3-17.
12. Moreno-Montanes J, Gomez-Demmel E, Lajara-Blesa J, Aliseda-Perez D. Comparative study of three non-contact tonometers and the Goldmann tonometer. Ophthalmologica. 1994;208:115-118.
13. Popovich KS, Shields MB. A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:44-46.
14. Jorge J, Diaz-Rey JA, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, et al. Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new non-contact tonometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2002;22:560-564.
15. Jorge J, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Diaz-Rey JA, et al. Clinical performance of non-contact tonometry by Reichert AT550 in glaucomatous patients. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2003;23:503-506.
16. Shields MB. The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;24:211-219.
17. Britt JM, Clifton BC, Barnebey HS, Mills RP. Microaerosol formation in noncontact "air-puff" tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:225-228.
18. Brandt JD. Corneal thickness in glaucoma screening, diagnosis, and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:85-89.
19. Ko YC, Liy CJ, Hsu WM. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers. Eye. 2005;19:327-332.
20. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:851-854.