Legitimate allocation of public healthcare: Beyond accountability for reasonableness

Public Health Ethics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 59-69

  Lauridsen, Sigurd ^a   Lippert Rasmussen, Kasper ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; MORALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; REVIEW;

EID: 77953418526     PISSN: 17549973     EISSN: 17549981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/phe/php001     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds), Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 67- 91.
2. Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. (1997).Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3, 313-342.
3. Daniels, N. (1994). 4 Unsolved Rationing Problems-A Challenge. Hastings Center Report, 24, 27-29.
4. Daniels, N. (1999). Enabling Democratic Deliberation. InMacedo, S. (ed.), Deliberative Politics-Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 198-210.
5. Daniels, N. (2008). Just Health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Daniels, N. and Sabin, J. (1997). Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures,DemocraticDeliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26, 303-350.
7. Daniels, N. and Sabin, J. (2002). Setting Limits Fairly. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Estlund, D. (1997). Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: TheEpistemicDimension ofDemocraticAuthority. In Bohman, J. and Regh, W. (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 175-204.
9. Friedman, A. (2008). Beyond Accountability for Reasonableness. Bioethics, 22, 101-112.
10. Gibson, J. L., Martin, D. K. and Singer, P. A. (2004). Setting Priorities inHealth Care Organizations: Criteria, Processes, and Parameters of Success. BMCHealth Services Research, 4, 1-8.
11. Goodard, M., Hauck, K. and Smith, PC. (2006). Priority Setting in Health a Political Economy Perspective. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 1, 79-90.
12. Guido, C. and Bobbitt, P. (1978). Tragic Choices. New York: W. W. Norton.
13. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge Massachusetts, London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
14. Habermas, J. (1992). Faktiziẗat und Geltung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
15. Hasman, A. andHolm, S. (2005). Accountability for Reasonableness: Opening the Black Box of Process. Health Care Analysis, 13, 261-273.
16. Hunter, D. J. (2001). Rationing Healthcare: The Appeal of Muddling through Elegantly. Healthcare Paper, 2, 31-37.
17. Jeyanathan, T., Dhalla, I., Cuyler, T., Levinson, W., Laupacis, A., Martin, D., Sullivan, T. and Evans, W. (2006). Recommendations for Establishing a Citizens' Council to Guide Drug Policy in Ontario. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences.
18. Klein, R. (1993). Rationality and Rationing: Diffused or Concentrated Decision-Making. In Turnbridge, T. (ed.), Rationing of Health Care in Medicine. London: Royal College of Physicians of London, pp. 73-82.
19. Klein, R., Day, P., and Redmayne, S. (1996). Managing Scarcity. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
20. Logan, R., Fougere, G., Hague, K., Haretuku, R., Holloway, L.,Moore, A., Page, C., Pearce, N., Stewart, L., Sullivan, L., Talemaitoga, A. and Tepania-Palmer, G. (2004). Prioritising Health Services-A Background Paper for theNationalHealthCommittee,NewZealand. Wellington, New Zealand: The National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability.
21. Mechanic,D. (1997).Muddling through Elegantly: Finding the Proper Balance in Rationing. Health Affairs (Millwood.), 16, 83-92.
22. NICE. (2005). Social Value Judgements-Principles for theDevelopment of NICEGuidance. 3-34. 8-12-2005. Ref Type: Statute
23. Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism, 3rd edn.New York: Columbia University Press.