Cortical hubs form a module for multisensory integration on top of the hierarchy of cortical networks

Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

Volumn 4, Issue MAR, 2010, Pages

  Zamora López, Gorka ^a   Zhou, Changsong ^b   Kurths, Jürgen ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^d HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cortical hubs; Corticocortical networks; Integration; Multisensory integration; Segregation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953367591     PISSN: 16625196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/neuro.11.001.2010     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anthonisse, J. M. (1971). The rush in a directed graph. Technical Report BN9/71. Amsterdam, Stichting Mathematisch Centrum.
2. Arenas, A., Díaz-Guilera, A., and Pérez- Vicente, C. (2006). Synchronization reveals topological scales in complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 114102.
3. Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., and Paradiso, M. A. (2006). Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain. Baltimore, MD, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
4. Bressler, S. L., and Kelso, J. A. S. (2001). Cortical coordination dynamics and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 26-36.
5. Bullmore, E., and Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 1.
6. Cover, T. M., and Thomas, J. A. (1991). Elements of Information Theory. New York, Wiley.
7. Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: a systemslevel proposal for the neuronal substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition 33, 25-62.
8. Engel, A. K., and Singer, W. (2001). Temporal binding and neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 16-25.
9. Fahle, M. (1993). Figure-ground discrimination from temporal information. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 254, 199-203.
10. Faser, A. M., and Swinney, H. L. (1986). Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys. Rev. A 33, 2318-2321.
11. Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35-41.
12. Fuster, J. M. (2003). Cortex and Mind: unifying cognition. New York, Oxford University Press.
13. Fuster, J. M. (2006). The cognit: a network model of cortical representation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 60, 125-132.
14. Graben, P., Zhou, C. S., Thiel, M., and Kurths, J. (eds). (2007). Lectures in Supercomputational Neuroscience. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
15. Hagmann, P., Cammoun, L., Gigandet, X., Meuli, R., Honey, C. J., Wedeen, V. J., and Sporns, O. (2008). Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 6, e159. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pbio.0060159.
16. Hilgetag, C. C., Burns, G. A., O'neill, M. A., Scannell, J. W., and Young, M. P. (2000). Anatomical connectivity defines the organization of clusters of cortical areas in the macaque monkey and the cat. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 355, 91-110.
17. Hilgetag, C. C., and Kaiser, M. (2004). Clustered organisation of cortical connectivity. Neuroinformatics. 2, 353-360.
18. Holland, P. W., and Leinhardt, S. (1977). The statistical analysis of local structure in social networks. In Sociological Methodology, D. R. Heise, ed. (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass), pp. 1-45.
19. Honey, C. J., Kötter, R., Breakspear, M., and Sporns, O. (2007). Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 10240-10245.
20. Kaiser, M., and Hilgetag, C. C. (2006). Nonoptimal component placement, but short processing paths, due to long-distance projections in neural systems. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e95. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095.
21. Kaiser, M., Martin, R., Andras, P., and Young, M. P. (2007). Simulation of robustness against lesions of cortical networks. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25, 3185-3192.
22. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., and Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of Neural Science. New York, McGraw-Hill.
23. Kannan, R., Tetali, P., and Vempala, S. (1999). Simple Markov-chain algorithms for generating bipartite graphs and tournaments. Random Struct. Algorithms 14, 293-308.
24. Katz, L., and Powell, J. H. (1957). Probability distributions of random variables associated with a structure of the sample space of sociometric investigations. Ann. Math. Stat. 28, 442-448.
25. Knight, R. T. (2009). Neural networks debunk phrenology. Science 316, 1578.
26. Kötter, R., and Sommer, F. T. (2000). Global relationship between anatomical connectivity and activity propagation in the cerebral cortex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 355, 127-134.
27. Müller-Linow, M., Hilgetag, C. C., and Hütt, M. T. (2008). Organization of excitable dynamics in hierarchical biological networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000190. doi: 10.1371/journal. pcbi.1000190.
28. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45, 167-256.
29. Papoulis, A. (1991). Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. New York, McGraw-Hill.
30. Passingham, R. E., Stephan, K. E., and Kötter, R. (2002). The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex. Nat. Rev. 3, 606.
31. Rao, A. R., Jana, R., and Bandyopadhyay, S. (1996). A Markov chain Monte Carlo method for generating random (0, 1)-matrices with given marginals. Sankhya A 58, 225-242.
32. Ravasz, E., and Barabási, A.-L. (2003). Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 67, 026112.
33. Roberts, J. M. (2000). Simple methods for simulating sociomatrices with given marginal totals. Soc. Netw. 22, 273-283.
34. Robertson, L. C. (2003). Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness. Nat. Rev. 4, 93-102.
35. Scannell, J. W., Blakemore, C., and Young, M. P. (1995). Analysis of connectivity in the cat cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 15, 1463-1483.
36. Scannell, J. W., and Young, M. P. (1993). The connectional organization of neural systems in the cat cerebral cortex. Curr. Biol. 3, 191-200.
37. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379-423.
38. Singer, W., and Gray, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 555-586.
39. Sporns, O., Honey, C. J., and Kötter, R. (2007). Identification and classification of hubs in brain networks. PLoS One 10, e1049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001049.
40. Sporns, O., and Tononi, G. M. (2001). Classes of network connectivity and dynamics. Complexity 7, 28-38.
41. Stam, C. J., and Reijneveld, J. C. (2007). Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain. Nonlinear Biomed. Phys. 1, 3.
42. Tononi, G. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neurosci. 5, 42.
43. Tononi, G., McIntosh, A. R., Russell, D. P., and Edelman, G. M. (1998). Functional clustering: identifying strongly interactive brain regions in neuroimaging data. Neuroimage 7, 133.
44. Tononi, G., and Sporns, O. (1994). A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 5033.
45. Tononi, G., Sporns, O., and Edelman, G. M. (1996). A complexity measure for selective matching of signals by the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 3422.
46. Young, M. P., Hilgetag, C.-C., and Scannell, J. W. (2000). On imputing function to structure from the behavioural effects of brain lesions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 355, 147-161.
47. Zamora-López, G., Zhou, C. S., and Kurths, J. (2009). Graph analysis of cortical networks reveals complex anatomical communication substrate. Chaos 19, 015117.
48. Zemanová, L., Zhou, C. S., and Kurths, J. (2006). Structural and functional clusters of complex brain networks. Phy. D 224, 202-212.
49. Zhou, C. S., Zemanová, L., Zamora-López, G., Hilgetag, C. C., and Kurths, J. (2006). Hierarchical organization unveiled by functional connectivity in complex brain networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 238103.
50. Zhou, C. S., Zemanová, L., Zamora-López, G., Hilgetag, C. C., and Kurths, J. (2007). Structure-function relationship in complex brain networks expressed by hierarchical synchronization. New J. Phys. 9, 178.