Intra- and intergenomic relationships in interspecific hybrids between Brassica (B. rapa, B. napus) and a wild species B. maurorum as revealed by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH)

Euphytica

Volumn 173, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 113-120

  Yao, Xing Cheng ^a   Ge, Xian Hong ^a   Chen, Ji Peng ^a   Li, Zai Yun ^a  

^a HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Brassica maurorum; Brassica napus; Brassica rapa; Chromosome pairing; Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH); Interspecific hybrid

Indexed keywords

BRASSICA; BRASSICA CARINATA; BRASSICA JUNCEA; BRASSICA MAURORUM; BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA RAPA; BRASSICA RAPA SUBSP. RAPA;

EID: 77953322265     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: 15735060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-010-0131-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Armstrong KC, Keller WA (1981) Chromosomes pairing in haploid of Brassica campestris. Theor Appl Genet 59: 49-52. doi: 10. 1007/BF00275776.
2. Armstrong KC, Keller WA (1982) Chromosomes pairing in haploid of Brassica oleracea. Can J Genet Cytol 24: 735-739.
3. Baack EJ, Whitney KD, Rieseberg LH (2005) Hybridization and genome size evolution: timing and magnitude of nuclear DNA content increases in Helianthus homoploid hybrid species. New Phytol 167: 623-630. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8137. 2005. 01433. x.
4. Benabdelmouna A, Guéritaine G, Abirached-Darmency M, Darmency H (2003) Genome discrimination in progeny of interspecific hybrids between Brassica napus and Raphanus raphanistrum. Genome 46: 469-472. doi: 10. 1139/G03-020.
5. Chrungu B, Verma N, Mohanty A, Pradhan A, Shivanna KR (1999) Production and characterization of interspecific hybrids between B. maurorum and crop Brassicas. Theor Appl Genet 98: 608-613. doi: 10. 1007/s001220051111.
6. Fahleson J, Lagercrantz U, Mouras A, Glimelius K (1997) Characterization of somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Eruca sativa using species-specific repetitive sequences and genomic in situ hybridization. Plant Sci 123: 133-142. doi: 10. 1016/s0168-9452(96)04575-x.
7. Garg H, Banga S, Bansal P, Atri C, Banga SS (2007) Hybridizing Brassica rapa with wild crucifers Diplotaxis erucoides and Brassica maurorum. Euphytica 156: 417-424. doi: 10. 1007/s10681-007-9391-9.
8. Ge XH, Li ZY (2007) Intra- and intergenomic homology of B-genome chromosomes in trigenomic combinations of the cultivated Brassica species revealed by GISH analysis. Chromosome Res 15: 849-861. doi: 10. 1007/s10577-007-1168-4.
9. Howell EC, Kearsey MJ, Jones GH, King GJ, Armstrong SJ (2008) A and C genome distinction and chromosome identification in Brassica napus by sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization and genomic in situ hybridization. Genetics 180: 1849-1857. doi: 10. 1534/Genetics, 108. 095893.
10. Ji Y, Pertuze R, Chetelat RT (2004) Genome differentiation by GISH in interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of tomato and related nightshades. Chromosome Res 12: 107-116. doi: 10. 1023/B: CHRO. 0000013162. 33200. 61.
11. Kamstra SA, Ramanna MS, De Jeu MJ, Kuipers GJ, Jacobsen E (1999) Homoeologous chromosome pairing in the distant hybrid Alstroemeria aurea × A. inodora and the genome composition of its backcross derivatives determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization with species-specific probes. Heredity 82: 69-78. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2540. 1999. 00465. x.
12. Karlov GI, Khrustaleva LI, Lim KB, van Tuyl JM (1999) Homoeologous recombination in 2n-gamete producing interspecific hybrids of Lilium (Liliaceae) studied by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Genome 42: 681-686. doi: 10. 1139/gen-42-4-681.
13. Leitch AR, Schwarzacher T, Jackson D, Leitch IJ (1994) Microscopy handbook No. 27. In situ hybridization: a practical guide. Bios Scientific, Oxford.
14. Li MT, Li ZY, Zhang CY, Qian W, Meng JL (2005) Reproduction and cytogenetic characterization of interspecific hybrids derived from crosses between Brassica carinata and B. rapa. Theor Appl Genet 110: 1284-1289. doi: 10. 1007/s00122-005-1965-0.
15. Lukens LN, Pires JC, Leon E, Vogelzang R, Oslach L et al (2006) Patterns of sequence loss and cytosine methylation within a population of newly resynthesized Brassica napus allopolyploids. Plant Physiol 140: 336-348. doi: 10. 1104/pp. 105. 066308.
16. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3): 473-497.
17. Nicolas SD, Le Mignon G, Eber F, Coriton O, Monod H, Clouet V, Huteau V, Lostanlen A, Delourme R, Chalhoub B, Ryder CD, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E (2007) Homeologous recombination plays a major role in chromosome rearrangements that occur during meiosis of Brassica napus haploids. Genetics 175: 487-503. doi: 10. 1534/genetics. 106. 062968.
18. Nicolas SD, Leflon M, Liu Z, Eber F, Chelysheva L, Coriton O, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E (2008) Chromosome 'speed dating' during meiosis of polyploid Brassica hybrids and haploids. Cytogenet Genome Res 120: 331-338. doi: 10. 1159/000121082.
19. Osborn TC, Butrulle DV, Sharpe AG, Pickering KJ, Parkin IAP et al (2003) Detection and effects of a homeologous reciprocal transposition in Brassica napus. Genetics 165: 1569-1577.
20. Pires JC, Zhao JW, Schranz ME, Leon EJ, Quijada PA et al (2004) Flowering time divergence and genomic rearrangements in resynthesized Brassica polyploids (Brassicaceae). Biol J Linn Soc 82: 675-688. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1095-8312. 2004. 00350. x.
21. Pradhan AK, Prakash S, Mukhopadhyay A, Pental D (1992) Phylogeny of Brassica and allied genera based on variation in chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA patterns: molecular and taxonomical classifications are incongruous. Theor Appl Genet 85: 331-340. doi: 10. 1007/BF00222878.
22. Prakash S (1973) Haploidy in Brassica nigra Koch. Euphytica 22: 613-614. doi: 10. 1007/BF00036663.
23. Prakash S, Bhat SR, Quiros CF, Kirti PB, Chopra VL (2009) Brassica and its close allies: cytogenetics and evolution. Plant Breed Rev 31: 21-187.
24. Rieseberg LH, Vanfossen C, Desrochers AM (1995) Hybrid speciation accompanied by genomic reorganization in wild sunflowers. Nature 375: 313-316. doi: 10. 1038/375313a0.
25. Snowdon RJ, Kohler W, Friedt W, Kohler A (1997) Genomic in situ hybridization in Brassica amphidiploids and interspecific hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 95: 1320-1324. doi: 10. 1007/s001220050699.
26. Snowdon RJ, Winter H, Diestal A, Sacristan MD (2000) Development and characterization of Brassica napus-Sinapis arvensis addition line exhibiting resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans. Theor Appl Genet 101: 1008-1014. doi: 10. 1007/s001220051574.
27. Song KM, Lu P, Tang KL, Osborn TC (1995) Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 7719-7723.
28. Stevenson M, Armstrong SJ, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jones GH (1998) Comparative analysis of crossover exchanges and chiasmata in Allium cepa × fistulosum after genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Chromosome Res 6: 567-574. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1009296826942.
29. Takahata Y, Hinata K (1983) Studies on cytodemes in the subtribe Brassicinae. Tohoku J Agric Res 33: 111-124.
30. Thompson KF (1956) Production of haploid plants of narrow stem kale. Nature 178: 748. doi: 10. 1038/178748a0.
31. Truco MJ, Hu J, Sadowski J, Quiros CF (1996) Inter- and intra-genomic homology of the Brassica genomes: implications for their origin and evolution. Theor Appl Genet 93: 1225-1233. doi: 10. 1007/BF00223454.
32. Wang YP, Zhao XX, Sonntag K, Wehling P, Snowdon RJ (2005) Behaviour of Sinapis alba addition chromosomes in a Brassica napus background revealed by genomic in situ hybridization. Chromosome Res 13: 819-826. doi: 10. 1007/s10577-005-1017-2.
33. Warwick SI, Black LD (1991) Molecular systematics of Brassica and allied genera (subtribe Brassicinae, Brassiceae)-chloroplast genome and cytodeme congruence. Theor Appl Genet 82: 81-92. doi: 10. 1007/BF00231281.
34. Yao XC, Du XZ, Ge XH, Chen JP, Li ZY (2010) Intra- and intergenomic chromosome pairings revealed by dual-color GISH in Brassica trigenomic hybrids of Brasscia juncea and B. carinata with B. maurorum. Genome 53: 14-22. doi: 10. 1139/G09-082.
35. Zhong XB, Hans JJ, Zabel P (1996) Preparation of tomato meiotic pachytene and mitotic metaphase chromosomes suitable for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Chromosome Res 4: 24-28. doi: 10. 1007/BF02254940.