Productivity, innovation strategies and industrial relations in SMEs. Empirical evidence for a local production system in northern Italy

International Review of Applied Economics

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 453-482

  Antonioli, Davide ^a   Mazzanti, Massimiliano ^a   Pini, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Industrial relations; Innovation strategies; Local production system; Productivity; SMEs

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FIRM SIZE; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; LABOR PRODUCTIVITY; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; PRODUCTIVITY; SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE;

ITALY;

EID: 77953307776     PISSN: 02692171     EISSN: 14653486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02692171.2010.483790     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Addison J.T., W.S. Siebert, J. Wagner, and X. Wei. 2000. Worker participation and firm performance: Evidence from Germany and Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations 38, no. 1: 7-48.
2. Addison J.T., C. Schnabel, and J. Wagner. 2001. Works council in Germany: Their effects on establishment performance. Oxford Economic Papers 53, no. 4: 659-94.
3. Amin, A. 1999. The emilian model: institutional challenges. European Planning Studies 7, no. 4: 389-406.
4. Antonioli, D. 2009. Industrial relations, techno-organizational innovations and firm economic performance. Economia Politica XXVI, no. 1. Forthcoming.
5. Antonioli D., L. Delsoldato, M. Mazzanti, and P. Pini. 2007. Dinamiche innovative, relazioni industriali, performance nelle imprese manifatturiere. II Indagine sul sistema locale di Reggio Emilia, Milano, Franco Angeli.
6. Antonioli, D., M. Mazzanti, and P. Pini. 2009. Innovation, working conditions and industrial relations: Evidence for a local production system. Economic and Industrial Democracy 30, no. 2. Forthcoming.
7. Antonioli, D., M. Mazzanti, P. Pini, and Tortia. 2004. Adoption of techno-organizational innovations, and industrial relations in manufacturing firms: An analysis for a local indus- trial system. Economia Politica XXI, no. 1: 11-52.
8. Arnal, E., W. Ok, and R. Torres. 2001. Knowledge, work organization and economic growth, labour market and social policies. Occasional Paper no. 50. Paris: OECD.
9. Arulampalam, W., and A. Booth. 1998. Training and labour market flexibility: Is there a trade-off? British Journal of Industrial Relation 36, no. 4: 521-36.
10. Arvanitis, S. 2005. Modes of labour flexibility at firm level: Are there any implications for performance and innovation? Evidence for the Swiss economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 14, no. 6: 993-1016.
11. Atkinson, J. 1984. Manpower strategies for flexible organizations. Personnel Management 16, no. 8: 28-31.
12. Baldwin, C. 1983. Productivity and labour unions: An application of the theory of self-enforcing contracts. Journal of Business 56, no. 2: 155-85.
13. Bhattacharya, M., and H. Bloch. 2004. Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics 22, no. 2: 155-62.
14. Black, S.E., and L.M. Lynch. 2001. How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics 83, no. 3: 434-445.
15. Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and J. Van Reenen. 1999. Market structure and innovation: Evidence from British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies 66, no. 3: 529-54.
16. Booth, A. 1995. The Economics of the Trade Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bresnahan, T.F., E. Brynjolfsson, and L.M. Hitt. 2002. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, no. 1: 339-76
18. Brusco, S. 1982. The emilian model: productive decentralization and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6, no. 2: pp. 167-184.
19. Brynjolfsson, E., and L. Hitt. 2000. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspective 14, no. 4: 23-48.
20. Brynjolfsson, E., and S. Yang. 1996. Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature. Advances in Computers 43: 179-214.
21. Cappelli, P., and D. Neumark. 2004. External churning and internal flexibility: Evidence on the functional flexibility and core-periphery hypothese. Industrial Relations 43, no. 1: 148-82.
22. Chandler, A. 1992. Organizational capabilities and the economic history of the industrial enterprise. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 63, no. 3: 79-100.
23. Cochran, W. 1977. Sampling Techniques. New York: Wiley.
24. Cohen, W.M., and R.C. Levin. 1989. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In Handbook of industrial organization, ed. R. Schmalensee and R.D. Wigg. New York: North-Holland.
25. Conti, G. 2005. Training, productivity and wages in Italy. Labour Economics 12: 557-76.
26. Coriat, B., and G. Dosi. 2002. The nature and accumulation of organizational competences/capabilities. Revista Brasileira de Inovação 1, no. 2: 275-326.
27. Crespi, F., and M. Pianta. 2007. Demand and innovation in European industries. Economia Politica XXIV, no. 1.
28. Deery, S., P. Erwin, and R. Iverson. 1999. Industrial relations climate, attendance behaviour and the role of trade unions. British journal of Industrial Relations 37, no. 4, 533-58.
29. EC. 2002. New forms of work organization: the obstacles to wider diffusion. European Commission, Final Report.
30. Foss, N.J. 2005. Strategy, economic organization, and the knowledge economy. The coordination of firms and resources. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Griffith, R., E. Huergo, J. Mairesse, and B. Peters. 2006. Innovation and productivity across four European countries. NBER Working Paper, no. 12722.
32. Grout, P.A. 1984. Investment and wages in absence of binding contracts. Econometrica 51, no. 2: 449-60.
33. Hall, B.H., and J. Mairesse. 1995. Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics 65, no. 1: 263-93.
34. Hall, B.H., and J. Mairesse. 2006. Empirical studies of innovation in the knowledge-driven economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15, no. 4/5: 289-99.
35. Handle, M., and D. Levine. 2004. Editors' introduction: The effects of new work practices on workers. Industrial Relations 43, no. 1: 1-43.
36. Hempell, T. 2005. What's spurious, what's real? Measuring impacts of ICT at the firm-level. Empirical Economics 30, no. 2: 427-64.
37. Hirsch, B.T. 1991. Union coverage and profitability among U.S. firms. The Review of Economic and Statistics 73, no. 1: 69-77.
38. Huselid, M. 1995. The impact of human resources management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 38, no. 3: 635-72.
39. Huselid, M.A. and B.E. Becker. 1996. Methodological issues in cross-sectional and panel estimates of the human resource-firm performance link. Industrial Relations 35, no. 3: 400-22.
40. Ichniowski, C., G. Prennushi, and K. Shaw. 1997. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A case study of steel finishing line. American Economic Review 87, no. 3: 291-313.
41. Janod, V., and A. Saint-Martin. 2004. Measuring the impact of work reorganization on firm performance: Evidence from French manufacturing, 1995-1999. Labour Economics 11, no. 6: 785-98.
42. Kalleberg, A.L. 2001. Organizing flexibility: The flexible firm in the new century, British Journal of Industrial Relations 39, no. 4: 479-504.
43. Kremp, E., and J. Mairesse. 2004. Knowledge management, innovation and productivity: A firm level exploration based on French manufacturing CIS3 data. NBER Working Paper, no. 10237.
44. Laursen, K., N.J. Foss. 2003. New human resources management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27, no. 2: 243-63.
45. Leiponen, A. 2005. Skills and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23, no. 5-6: 303-23.
46. Leoni, R. eds. 2008. Economia dell'innovazione. Disegni organizzativi, pratiche di gestione delle risorse umane e performance d'impresa. Milano: Franco Angeli.
47. Lundvall, B.A. 2006. Knowledge management in the learning economy. Working paper 06- 06, DRUID.
48. Machin, S., and S. Wadhwani. 1991. The effects of unions on investment and innovation evidence from WIRS. The Economic Journal 101, no. 405: 324-30.
49. Malerba, F. 2007. Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges. International Journal of Industrial Organization 25, no. 4: 675-99.
50. Mazzanti, M., S. Montresor, and P. Pini. 2007a. Outsourcing and transaction costs in 'real' time and space: Evidence for a province of Emilia-Romagna (Italy). The ICFAI Journal of Industrial Economics IV, no. 3: 7-22.
51. Mazzanti, M., S. Montresor, and P. Pini. 2007b. Outsourcing and innovations: Evidence for a local production system of Emilia-Romagna. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 9, nos. 3-4: 324-45.
52. Mazzanti, M., P. Pini, and E. Tortia. 2006. Organisational innovations, human resources and firm performance. The Emilia-Romagna food sector. Journal of Socio-Economics 35, no. 1: 123-41.
53. Menezes-Filho, N., D. Ulph, and J. Van Reenen. 1998. R&D and unionism: comparative evidence from British companies and establishment. Industrial and Labour Relations Review 52, no. 1: 45-63.
54. Menezes-Filho, N., and J. Van Reenen. 2003. Unions and innovation: A survey of the theory and empirical evidence. In International handbook of trade unions, ed. J.T. Addison and C. Schnabel. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
55. Metcalf, D. 2003. Unions and productivity, financial performance and investment: international evidence. In International handbook of trade unions, ed. J.T. Addison and C. Schnabel. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
56. Michie, J., and M. Sheehan. 2003. Labour market deregulation, 'flexibility' and innovation. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27, no. 1: 123-43.
57. Nelson, R., and S. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. London: Harvard University Press.
58. Nielsen, P., and B-A. Lundvall. 2003. Innovation, learning organizations and industrial relations. Working paper 03-07, DRUID.
59. Nonaka, I., R. Toyama, and A. Nagata. 2000. A firm is a knowledge-creating entity: A new perspective on the theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change 9, no. 1: 1-20.
60. OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD.
61. Osterman, P. 2000. Work organization in a era of restructuring: Trends in diffusion and impacts on employee welfare. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52, no. 2: 179-96.
62. Pini, P., and G. Santangelo. 2005. Innovation types and labour organisational practices: A comparison of foreign and domestic firms in the Reggio Emilia industrial districts. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14, no. 4: 251-76.
63. Piva, M., and M. Vivarelli. 2002. The skill bias: Comparative evidence and an econometric test. International Review of Applied Economics 16, no. 3: 347-57.
64. Rassier, D.G. 2005. Do trade unions affect compliance with environmental regulation? PhD, Economics, University of Kansas, Lawrence May 2005.
65. Rogers, M. 2004. Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22, no. 2: 141-53.
66. Teece, D. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15, no. 6: 285-305.
67. Teece, D.J. 1996. Firm organization, industrial structure and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 31: 193-224.
68. Teece, D., and G. Pisano. 1998. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. In Technology, organization, and competitiveness: perspectives on industrial and corporate change, ed. G. Dosi, D. Teece, and J. Chytry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Wooldridge, J. 2002. Econometrics analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Zwick, T. 2005. Continuing vocational training form and establishment productivity in Germany. German Economic Review 6, no. 2: 155-84.