Cortical dynamics of visual change detection based on sensory memory

NeuroImage

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 302-308

  Urakawa, Tomokazu ^a,b   Inui, Koji ^a,b   Yamashiro, Koya ^a   Tanaka, Emi ^a   Kakigi, Ryusuke ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLUE LIGHT; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN REGION; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE OCCIPITAL CORTEX; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RED LIGHT; SENSORY MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COLOR; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; VISION;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COLOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77953293905     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.071     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Astikainen P., Ruusuvirta T., Korhonen T. Longer storage of auditory than of visual information in the rabbit brain: evidence from dorsal hippocampal electrophysiology. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 160:189-193.
2. Astikainen P., Lillstrang E., Ruusuvirta T. Visual mismatch negativity for changes in orientation-a sensory memory-dependent response. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:2319-2324.
3. Becker M.W., Pashler H., Anstis S.M. The role of iconic memory in change-detection tasks. Perception 2000, 29:273-286.
4. Bonte M., Parviainen T., Hytonen K., Salmelin R. Time course of top-down and bottom-up influences on syllable processing in the auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:115-123.
5. Czigler I., Balazs L., Winkler I. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:869-873.
6. Downar J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., Davis K.D. A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:277-283.
7. Fu S., Fan S., Chen L. Event-related potentials reveal involuntary processing of orientation changes in the visual modality. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:770-775.
8. Hari R., Joutsiniemi S.L., Sarvas J. Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1988, 71:64-72.
9. Inui K., Kakigi R. Temporal analysis of the flow from V1 to the extrastriate cortex in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96:775-784.
10. Inui K., Wang X., Tamura Y., Kaneoke Y., Kakigi R. Serial processing in the human somatosensory system. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:851-857.
11. Irwin D.E. Visual memory within and across fixations. Eye movement and visual cognition: Scene perception and Reading 1992, 146-165. Springer-Verlag, New York. K. Rayner (Ed.).
12. Irwin D.E., Thomas L.E. Visual sensory memory. Visual Memory 2008, 9-41. OXFORD University Press, England. S.J. Luck, A. Hollingworth (Eds.).
13. Keysers C., Xiao D.K., Foldiak P., Perrett D.I. Out of sight but not out of mind: the neurophysiology of iconic memory in the superior temporal sulcus. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2005, 22:316-332.
14. Kimura M., Katayama J., Ohira H., Schroger E. Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:402-409.
15. Lehtonen J.B. Functional differentiation between late components of visual evoked potentials recorded at occiput and vertex: effect of stimulus interval and contour. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1973, 35:75-82.
16. Maekawa T., Tobimatsu S., Ogata K., Onitsuka T., Kanba S. Preattentive visual change detection as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN)-evidence for a memory-based process. Neurosci. Res. 2009, 65:107-112.
17. Mäntysalo S., Näätänen R. The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials. Biol. Psychol. 1987, 24:183-195.
18. May P.J.C., Tiitinen H. Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:1-57.
19. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav. Brain Sci. 1990, 13:201-288.
20. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
21. Näätänen R., Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125:826-859.
22. Phillips W. Change perception needs sensory storage. Behav. Brain Sci. 1983, 6:35-36.
23. Sams M., Hari R., Rif J., Knuutila J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10sec: neuromagnetic Evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1993, 5:363-370.
24. Supek S., Aine C.J. Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1993, 40:529-540.
25. Tanaka E., Inui K., Kida T., Miyazaki T., Takeshima Y., Kakigi R. A transition from unimodal to multimodal activations in four sensory modalities in humans: an electrophysiological study. BMC Neurosci. 2008, 9:116.
26. Tanaka E., Kida T., Inui K., Kakigi R. Change-driven cortical activation in multisensory environments: an MEG study. NeuroImage 2009, 48:464-474.
27. Tanaka E., Inui K., Kida T., Kakigi R. Common cortical responses evoked by appearance, disappearance and change of the human face. BMC Neurosci. 2009, 10:38.
28. Tarkiainen A., Helenius P., Salmelin R. Category-specific occipitotemporal activation during face perception in dyslexic individuals: an MEG study. NeuroImage 2003, 19:1194-1204.
29. Urakawa, T., Inui, K., Yamashiro, K., Kakigi, R., in press. Cortical dynamics of the visual change detection process. Psychophsiology. doi:. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00987.x.