Performance-integrated self-report measurement of physical ability

Spine Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 433-440

  Mooney, Vert ^a,b   Matheson, Leonard N ^a,c   Verna, Joe ^a   Leggett, Scott ^a   Dreisinger, Thomas E ^a   Mayer, John M ^a,d  

^a US Spine & Sport Foundation   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c EpicRehab   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability; Functional capacity; Physical function; Self report measures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIFTING; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 77953292539     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ware J.J., and Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 30 (1992) 473-481
2. Cella D., Yount S., Rothrock N., et al., On behalf of the PCG. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 45 (2007) S3-S11
3. Resnik L., Liu D., Mor V., and Hart D.L. Predictors of physical therapy clinic performance in the treatment of patients with low back pain syndromes. Phys Ther 88 (2008) 989-1004
4. Cooper J., Kohlmann T., Michael J., et al. Health outcomes. New quality measure for Medicare. Int J Qual Health Care 13 (2001) 9-16
5. Resnik L., and Hart D. Using clinical outcomes to identify expert physical therapists. Phys Ther 83 (2003) 990-1002
6. Resnik L., Feng Z., and Hart D. State regulation and the delivery of physical therapy services. Health Serv Res 41 (2006) 1296-1316
7. American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 6th ed. (2008), American Medical Association, Chicago, IL
8. Hudak P.L., Amadio P.C., and Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29 (1996) 602-608
9. Beaton D.E., Wright J.G., and Katz J.N. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 1038-1046
10. Matheson L.N., Melhorn J.M., Mayer T.G., et al. Reliability of a visual analog version of the QuickDASH. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 (2006) 1782-1787
11. Gatchel R.J., Mayer T.G., and Theodore B.R. The pain disability questionnaire: relationship to one-year functional and psychosocial rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil 16 (2006) 75-94
12. Anagnostis C., Gatchel R.J., and Mayer T.G. The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Spine 29 (2004) 2290-2302
13. Matheson L., Mooney V., Leggett S., et al. Multidimensional task ability profile (2003), MindTrust, San Diego, CA
14. Mayer J., Mooney V., Matheson L., et al. The reliability and validity of a new computerized pictorial activity and task sort. J Occup Rehabil 15 (2005) 185-195
15. Eisler H. Subjective scale of force for a large muscle group. J Exp Psychol 64 (1962) 253-257
16. Legg S., and Myles W. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workloads for an 8-hour work-day using psychophysical and subjective rating methods. Ergonomics 24 (1981) 907-916
17. Deyo R.A. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69 (1988) 1044-1053
18. Michel A., Kohlmann T., and Raspe H. The association between clinical findings on physical examination and self-reported severity in back pain. Results of a population-based study. Spine 22 (1997) 296-303
19. Marras W.S., Lewis K.E., Ferguson S.A., and Parnianpour M. Impairment magnification during dynamic trunk motions. Spine 25 (2000) 587-595
20. Garg A., and Saxena U. Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 49 (1979) 894-903
21. Borg G. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14 (1982) 377-381
22. Snook S. Psychophysical considerations in permissible loads. Ergonomics 28 (1985) 327-330
23. Jiang B., Smith J., and Ayoub M. Psychophysical modeling of manual materials-handling capacities using isoinertial strength variables. Hum Factors 28 (1986) 671-702
24. Khalil T., Goldberg M., Asfour S., et al. Acceptable maximum effort. A psychophysical measure of strength in back pain patients. Spine 12 (1987) 372-376
25. Mayer T.G., Barnes D., Nichols G., et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. II. A comparison with isokinetic lifting in a disabled chronic low-back pain industrial population. Spine 3 (1988) 998-1002
26. Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health 16 (1990) 55-58
27. Karwowski W., Yates J., and Pongpatana N. Discriminability of load heaviness: Implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting. Ergonomics 35 (1992) 729-744
28. Snook S. Psychophysical assessments of material handling efforts. Proceedings of the 12th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (1994), Human Factors Association of Canada, Hopkinton, MA 274-276
29. Matheson L., Mooney V., Grant J., et al. A test to measure lift capacity of physically impaired adults. Part 1 Development and reliability testing. Spine 20 (1995) 2119-2129
30. Matheson L., Mooney V., Holmes D., et al. A test to measure lift capacity of physically impaired adults. Part 2 Reactivity in a patient sample. Spine 20 (1995) 2130-2134
31. Matheson L. EPIC Lift Capacity Test examiner's manual (1994), Work Evaluation Systems Technology, Fort Bragg, CA
32. Brodman K., Erdmann A., and Wolff H. Cornell Medical Index Health Questionnaire manual (1949), Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY
33. Matheson L. Relationships among age, body weight, resting heart rate, and performance in a new test of lift capacity. J Occup Rehabil 6 (1996) 225-237
34. Jay M., Lamb J., Watson R., et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC Lift Capacity test on a previously injured population. Spine 25 (2000) 1405-1412
35. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and the attainment tests (1960), Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
36. Andrich D. Rasch models of measurement (1988), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
37. Matheson L., Mayer J., Mooney V., et al. A method to provide a more efficient and reliable measure of self-report physical work capacity for patients with spinal pain. J Occup Rehabil 18 (2008) 46-57
38. Mayer J., Mooney V., Matheson L., et al. Continuous low-level heat wrap therapy for the prevention and treatment of delayed onset muscle soreness of the low back muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 (2006) 1310-1317
39. Cronbach L. Dependability of behavioral measurements: theory of generalizability for scores and profiles (1972), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
40. U.S. Department of Labor. The revised handbook for analyzing jobs (1991), U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC