The pain disability questionnaire: Relationship to one-year functional and psychosocial rehabilitation outcomes

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 75-94

  Gatchel, Robert J ^a   Mayer, Tom G ^b   Theodore, Brian R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c PRIDE Research Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Depression; Functional assessment; Functional restoration; Occupational injury; Outcome measures; Pain disability questionnaire; Rating scale; Workers' compensation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PAIN DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; PREDICTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORK CAPACITY; WORK RESUMPTION; WORKMAN COMPENSATION;

ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TEXAS;

EID: 33745468073     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-9005-0     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271-273.
2. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000; 25: 3115-3124.
3. LeClaire R, Blier F, Fortin L. A cross-sectional study comparing the Oswestry and Roland-Morris functional disability scales in two populations of patients with low back pain of different levels of severity. Spine 1997; 22:68-71.
4. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483.
5. Ware JR, Kosinski N, Bayliss MS. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 Health profiles and summary measures. Summary of results of the medical outcomes study. Med Care 1995; 33: AS264-AS279.
6. Million R, Hall R, Nilsen K, Baker R. Assessment of the progress of the back-pain patient. Spine 1982; 7: 204-212.
7. Anagnostis C, Mayer T, Gatchel R, Proctor T. The million visual analog scale: its utility for predicting tertiary rehabilitation outcomes. Spine 2003; 28: 1051-1060.
8. Anagnostis C, Gatchel R, Mayer T. The development of a comprehensive biopsychosocial measure of disability for chronic musculoskeletal disorders: The Pain Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2004; 29: 2290-2302.
9. Underwood MR, Barnett AG, Vickers MR. Evaluation of two time-specific back pain outcome measures. Spine 1999; 24: 1104-1112.
10. Gatchel RJ. Occupational low back pain disability: Why function needs to "drive" the rehabilitation process. Am Pain Soc J 1994; 3: 107-110.
11. Beurskens A, de Vet H, Koke A, Heijden V, Knipschild P. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain: Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires. Spine 1995; 20: 1017-1028.
12. Feise RJ, Menke JM. Functional rating index: A new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine 2001; 26: 78-87.
13. Kopec J. Measuring functional outcomes in persons with back pain. Spine. 2000; 25: 3110-3114.
14. Ohnmeiss DD. Oswestry back pain disability questionnaire. In: Gatchel RJ, ed. Compendium of outcome instruments for assessment and research of spinal disorders. LaGrange, IL: North American Spine Society, 2000, pp. 52-54.
15. Triano JJ, McGregor M, Cramer GD, Emde DL. A comparison of outcome measures for use with back pain patients: Results of a feasibility study. J Manipul Physiol Ther 1993; 16: 67-73.
16. Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P. Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the pain disability index and the Oswestiy disability questionnaire and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 1993; 9: 189-195.
17. Fisher K, Johnson M. Validation of the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of the chronic pain experience. Physiother Theory Pract 1997; 13: 67-80.
18. Kaplan G, Wurtele S, Gillis D. Maximal effort during functional capacity evaluations: An examination of psychological factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 161-164.
19. Ohnmeiss DD, Vanharanta H, Estlander AM, Jamsen A. The relationship of disability (Oswestry) and pain drawings to functional testing. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 208-212.
20. Gronblad M, Jarvinen E, Hurri H. Relationship of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back pain and leg pain. Clin J Pain 1994; 10: 197-203.
21. Kopec J, Esdaile J, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping D, et al. The Quebec back pain disability scale: measurement properties. Spine 1995; 20: 341-52.
22. Capra P, Mary T, Gatchel J. Adding psychological scales to your low back pain assessment. J Musculoskel Med 1985; 7: 41-52.
23. Taylor S, Taylor A, Foy M, Fogg A. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Spine 1999; 24: 1805-1812.
24. Gatchel RJ, Mayer T, Dersh J, Robinson R, Polatin PB. The association of the SF-36 health status survey with 1-year socioeconomic outcomes in a chronically disabled spinal disorder population. Spine 1999; 24: 2162-2170.
25. Gatchel R, Polatin P, Mayer T, Robinson R, Dersh J. Use of the SF-36 health status survey with a chronically disabled back pain population: Strengths and limitations. J Occup Rehab 1998; 8: 237-245.
26. Polatin P, Kinney R, Gatchel R, Lillo E, Mayer T. Psychiatric illness and chronic low back pain: the mind and the spine - which goes first? Spine 1993; 18: 66-71.
27. Dersh J, Gatchel R, Polatin P. Chronic spinal disorders and psychopathology : research findings and theoretical considerations. Spine 2001; 1: 88-94.
28. Dersh J, Gatchel R, Polatin P, Mayer T. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic work-related musculoskeletal pain disability. JOEM 2002; 44: 459-468.
29. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Kishino N, Keeley J, Capra P, Mayer H, et al. Objective Assessment of Spine Function Following Industrial Accident: A Prospective Study with Comparison Group and 1-Year Follow-Up; Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences, 1985. Spine 1985; 10: 482-93.
30. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Kishino N, Keeley J, Mayer H, Mayer H, et al. A prospective short-term study of chronic low back pain patients utilizing novel objective functional measurement. Pain 1986; 25: 53-68.
31. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Mayer H, Kishino N, Keeley J, Mooney V. A prospective 2-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury: an objective assessment procedure. JAMA 1987; 258: 1763-1767.
32. Garcy P, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Recurrent or new injury outcomes after return to work in chronic disabling spinal disorders: Tertiary prevention efficacy of functional restoration treatment. Spine 1996; 21: 952-959.
33. Jordan K, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Should extended disability be an exclusion criterion for tertiary rehabilitation?: Socioeconomic outcomes of early vs. late functional restoration in compensation spinal disorders. Spine 1998; 23: 2110-2117.
34. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Evans T. Effect of age on outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation for chronic disabling spinal disorders. Spine 2001; 26: 1378-1384.
35. Mayer T, McMahon M, Gatchel R, Sparks B, Wright A, Pegues P. Socioeconomic outcomes of combined spine surgery and functional restoration in workers' compensation spinal disorders with matched controls. Spine 1998; 23: 598-606.
36. Wright A, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Outcomes of disabling cervical spine disorders in compensation injuries: A prospective comparison to tertiary rehabilitation response for chronic lumbar spinal disorders. Spine 1999; 24: 178-183.
37. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Polatin P, Evans T. Outcomes comparison of treatment for chronic disabling work-related upper extremity disorders and spinal disorders. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41: 761-770.
38. Mayer T, Anagnostis C, Gatchel R, Evans T. Impact of functional restoration after anterior cervical fusion on chronic disability in work-related neck pain. Spine 2002; 2: 267-273.
39. Proctor T, Mayer T, Gatchel R, McGeary D. Unremitting health-care-utilization outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation of chronic musculoskeletal disorders. JBJS 2004; 86: 62-69.
40. Proctor T, Mayer T, Theodore B, Gatchel R. Failure to complete a functional restoration program for chronic musculoskeletal disorders: A prospective 1-year outcome study. Arch Phys Med, 2005; 86(8): 1509-1515.
41. McGeary D, Mayer T, Gatchel R. High pain ratings predict treatment failure in chronic occupational muscu-loskeletal disorders. JBJS, 2006; 88: 317-325.
42. Mayer T, Gatchel R. Functional restoration for spinal disorders: the sports medicine approach. Philadelphia (PA) Lea & Febiger, 1988
43. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Keeley J, Mayer H, Richling D. A male incumbent worker industrial database. Part I: Lumbar spinal physical sapacity. Spine 1994; 19: 755-761.
44. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Keeley J, Mayer H, Richling D. A male incumbent worker industrial database. Part II: Cervical spinal physical capacity. Spine 1994; 19: 762-764.
45. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Keeley J, Mayer H, Richling D. A male incumbent worker industrial database. Part III: Lumbar/cervical functional testing. Spine 1994; 19: 765-770.
46. Mayer T, Pope P, Tabor J, Bovasso E, Gatchel R. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration, part I: lumbar mobility. Spine 1994; 18: 389-94.
47. Brady S, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part II: Isokinetic trunk strength. Spine 1994; 18: 395-400.
48. Curtis L, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Physical progress and residual impairment after functional restoration. Part III: Isokinetic and isoinertial lifting capacity. Spine 1994; 18: 401-405.
49. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scores: A user's manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994
50. Beck A, Steer R, Garbin W. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory : Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psych Rev 1988; 8: 77-100.
51. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neuro, Neurosurg Psychiat 1960; 23: 56-62.
52. Gatchel R. Research outcomes compendium. LaGrange, IL: North American Spine Society, 2001.
53. Mayer T, Prescott M, Gatchel R. Objective outcome evaluation: methods and evidence. In: Mayer T, Gatchel R, Polatin P, eds. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: Function, outcomes and evidence. Philadelphia, PA: Williams & Wilkins, 1999, pp. 651-667.
54. Mayer T, McGeary D, Gatchel R. Extreme pain ratings predict treatment failure in chronic occupational spinal disorders. Paper Presented at 19th Annual Meeting at the North American Spine Society, Chicago, IL, October 2004, pp. 26-30.
55. Eid M, Notz P, Schwenkmezger P, Steyer R. Sind Stimmungsdimensionen monopolar? Ein Überblick über empirische Berunde und Untersuchungen faktorenanalytischen Modellen für kontinuierliche und kategoriale Variablen sowie neuere Ergebnisse [Are mood dimensions monopolar? A review of empirical results and investigations with factor analyses of continuous and categorical variables as well as recent outcomes]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 1994, 15: 211-233.
56. Tait R, Chibnall JT. The Pain Disability Index: Psychometric properties. Pain 1990; 40: 171-182.
57. Hazard R, Haugh L, Reid S, Preble J. Early prediction of chronic disability after occupational low back injury. Spine 1996; 21: 945-951.
58. Linton S, Gross D, Schultz I, Main C, Cote P, Pransky G, Johnson W. Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: Research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 459-474.
59. Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: The challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 507-524.
60. Sullivan M, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R, Linton S, Pransky G. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 475-489.
61. Jette A, Haley S, Ni P. Comparison of functional status tools used in post-acute care. Health Care Financ Rev 2003; 24: 13-24.