Unicondylar knee replacement with a new tensioner device: Clinical results of a multicentre study on 168 cases

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 130, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 727-732

  Campbell, D ^a   Schuster, A J ^b   Pfluger, D ^c   Hoffmann, F ^d  

^a Wakefield Orthopaedic Clinic   (Australia)

^b Spital Bern Ziegler   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^d Klinikum Rosenheim   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ligament tensor; Soft tissue balancing surgical technique; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE EXTENSION; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE LIGAMENT TENSIONER; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORTHOPEDIC PROSTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; REOPERATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNICONDYLAR KNEE REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77953289059     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1092-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. C Ackroyd S Whitehouse J Newman C Joslin 2002 A comparison study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Br 84 667 672 10.1302/0301-620X.84B5.12404 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjtFKhtw%3D%3D 12188481
2. S Asif D Choon 2005 Midterm results of cemented press fit condylar sigma total knee arthroplasty system J Orthop Surg 13 280 284 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2MnnslOjsw%3D%3D
3. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2007) Annual Report Adelaide. http://www.aoa.org.au/docs/njarep07.pdf
4. J Bottros B Gad V Krebs W Barsoum 2006 Gap balancing in total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 21 11 15 10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.084 16781420 (Pubitemid 43866424)
5. D Campbell L Johnson S West 2006 Militarism quantitative computer-assisted tomography assessment of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties ANZ J Surg 76 782 787 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03867.x 16922897 (Pubitemid 44222311)
6. S Cool J Victor T de Baets 2006 Does a minimally invasive approach affect positioning of components in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? Early results with survivorship analysis Acta Orthop Belg 72 709 715 17260608
7. R Deshmukh R Scott 2001 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop 392 272 278 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00035 11716395
8. T Fehring 2006 Ligamentous balancing in rotating-platform knees Orthopedics 29 S56 S59 17002151
9. R Gleeson R Evans C Ackroyd J Webb J Newman 2004 Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study Knee 11 379 384 10.1016/j.knee.2004.06.006 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvktlyitw%3D%3D 15351413 (Pubitemid 39194791)
10. P Hernigou G Deschamps 2004 Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty Clin Orthop 423 161 165 10.1097/01.blo.0000128285.90459.12 15232443
11. M Ikeuchi N Yamanaka Y Okanoue E Ueta T Tani 2007 Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component at total knee replacement: a comparison of two techniques J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 45 49 10.1302/0301-620X. 89B1.17728 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2FlsFSrsg%3D%3D 17259415 (Pubitemid 46218411)
12. V Kasodekar S Yeo S Othman 2006 Clinical outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and influence of alignment on prosthesis survival rate Singapore Med J 47 796 802 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rgtVamuw%3D%3D 16924362
13. PE Müller C Pellengahr M Witt J Kircher HJ Refior V Jansson 2004 Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 19 296 301 10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.013 15067640 (Pubitemid 38519820)
14. AJ Price J Webb H Topf CAF Dodd JW Goodfellow DW Murray 2001 Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision J Arthroplasty 16 970 976 10.1054/arth.2001.25552 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnptFygug%3D%3D 11740750 (Pubitemid 33151871)
15. B Robinson JL Rees AJ Price DJ Beard DW Murray P McLardy Smith CAF Dodd 2002 Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 84 653 657 10.1302/0301-620X.84B5.12950 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjtFKhsQ%3D%3D 12188479 (Pubitemid 34846373)
16. O Robertsson K Knutson S Lewold L Lidgren 2001 The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 45 49 10.1302/0301-620X.83B1.10871 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7osVeitg%3D%3D 11245537
17. J Romero T Stähelin C Binkert C Pfirrmann J Hodler O Kessler 2007 The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 22 235 240 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.024 17275640 (Pubitemid 46162089)
18. G Saxler D Temmen G Bontemps 2004 Medium-term results of the AMC-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Knee 11 349 355 10.1016/j.knee.2004.03. 008 15351408 (Pubitemid 39194786)
19. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (2005) Annual Report. http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/uploadedFiles/104-SKAR%202005-engl.pdf
20. OJ Tabor O Tabor 1998 Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study J Arthroplasty 13 373 379 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90001-8 9645516 (Pubitemid 28270394)
21. N Walton I Jahromi PL Lewis PJ Dobson KR Angel DG Campbell 2006 Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work; total knee arthroplasty compared to mini-incision Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Knee Surg 19 1 5
22. L Whiteside 2005 Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last-three keys to success J Arthroplasty 20 2 3 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.029 15991117
23. T Wyss A Schuster P Münger D Pfluger U Wehrli 2006 Does total knee joint replacement with the soft tissue balancing surgical technique maintain the natural joint line? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126 480 486 10.1007/s00402-006- 0171-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28vnt1Wkug%3D%3D 16799793 (Pubitemid 44194513)