When does local spatial structure hinder competitive coexistence and reverse competitive hierarchies?

Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1605-1616

  Murrell, David J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Coexistence; Competition; Lotka Volterra; Spatial structure; Stochastic

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COEXISTENCE; CONSPECIFIC; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; LOTKA-VOLTERRA MODEL; NICHE PARTITIONING; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; STOCHASTICITY; SURVIVAL;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; PLANT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77953266985     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/09-0832.1     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Amarasekare, P. 2003. Competitive coexistence in. spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecology Letters 6: 1109-1122. (Pubitemid 37537833)
2. Atkinson, W. D., and B. Shorrocks. 1981. Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: a simulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology 50:461-471.
3. Barot, S., and J. Gignoux. 2004. Mechanisms promoting plant coexistence: Can all the proposed processes be reconciled? Oikos 106:158-192.
4. Bolker, B. M., and S. W. Pacala. 1997. Using moment equations to understand stochastically driven spatial pattern formation in ecological systems. Theoretical Population. Biology 52:179-197.
5. Bolker, B. M., and. S. W. Pacala. 1999. Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. American Naturalist 153:575-602.
6. Bolker, B. M., S. W. Pacala, and C. Neuhauser. 2003. Spatial dynamics in model plant communities: What do we really know? American. Naturalist 162:135-148.
7. Britton, N. F. 1989. Aggregation and the competitive exclusion principle. Journal of Theoretical. Biology 136:57-66.
8. Chesson, P. 1991. A. need for niches? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 6:26-28.
9. Chesson, P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual. Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 31:343-366.
10. Chesson, P., and C. Neuhauser. 2002. Intraspecific aggregation and species coexistence. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 210-211.
11. Condit, R., et al. 2000. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science 288:1414-1418. (Pubitemid 30366326)
12. Connell, J. H., T. E. Hughes, C. C. Wallace, J. E. Tanner, K. E. Harms, and A. M, Kerr. 2004. A long-term study of competition and diversity of corals. Ecological Monographs 74:179-210.
13. Cowen, R. K., and S. Sponaugle. 2009. Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. Annual Review of Marine Science 1:443-466.
14. Dieckmann, U., and R. Law. 2000. Relaxation projections and the method of moments. Pages 41.2-455 in U. Dieckmann, R. Law, and J. A. J. Metz, editors. The geometry of ecological interactions: simplifying spatial complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Dieckmann, U., R. Law, and J. A. J. Metz, editors. 2000. The geometry of ecological interactions: simplifying spatial complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
16. Doebeli, M., and C. Hauert. 2005. Models of cooperation based on the prisoner's dilemma and the snowdrift game. Ecology Letters 8:748-766. (Pubitemid 40850024)
17. Engel, S., and J. R. Pawlik. 2005. Interactions among Florida sponges. 1. Reef habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 303:133-144.
18. Etheridge, A. M. 2004. Survival and extinction in a locally regulated population. Annals of Applied Probability 14:188-214.
19. Gause, G. F. 1934. The struggle for existence. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
20. Harrison, R. G. 1980. Dispersal, polymorphisms in insects. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 11: 95-118.
21. Hassell, M. P., H. N. Comins, and R. M. May. 1994. Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics. Nature 370: 290-292. (Pubitemid 24250122)
22. Hauert, C., and M. Doebeli. 2004. Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game. Nature 428:643-646. (Pubitemid 38524804)
23. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
24. Ives, A. R. 1991. Aggregation and coexistence in a carrion fly community. Ecological Monographs 61:75-94.
25. Ives, A. R., and R. M. May. 1985. Competition within and between species n. A patchy environment: relations between microscopic and macroscopic models. Journal of Theoretical Biology 115:65-92.
26. Laird, R. A., and B. S. Schamp. 2008. Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks? Ecology 89:237-247.
27. Law, R., and U. Dieckmann. 2000α. A dynamical system for neighborhoods in plant communities. Ecology 81:2137-2148.
28. Law, R., and U. Dieckmann. 2000ft. Moment approximations of individual-based models. Pages 252-270 in U. Dieckmann, R. Law, and J. A. J. Metz, editors. The geometry of ecological interactions: simplifying spatial complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. Law, R., D. J. Murrell, and U. Dieckmann. 2003. Population growth in space and time: spatial, logistic equations. Ecology 84:252-262. (Pubitemid 36893001)
30. Levine, J. M., and D. J. Murrell. 2003. The community-level consequences of seed dispersal patterns. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:549-574.
31. Matthysen, E. 2005. Density-dependent dispersal in. birds and mammals. Ecography 28:403-416.
32. Murrell, D. J. 2005. Local spatial structure and predator-prey dynamics: counterintuitive effects of prey enrichment. American Naturalist 166:354-367.
33. Murrell, D. J. 2009. On the emergent spatial structure of sizestructured populations: When does self-thinning lead to a reduction in clustering? Journal of Ecology 97:256-266.
34. Murrell, D. J., U. Dieckmann, and R. Law. 2004. On moment closures for population dynamics in continuous space. Journal of Theoretical Biology 229:421.-432.
35. Murrell, D. J., and R. Law. 2003. Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors. Ecology Letters 6:48-59.
36. Murrell, D. J., D. W. Purves, and R. Law. 2001. Uniting pattern and process in plant ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:529-530.
37. Murrell, D. J., D. W. Purves, and R. Law. 2002. Intraspecific aggregation and species coexistence. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:211.
38. Neuhauser, C., and S. W. Pacala. 1999. An. explicitly spatial version of the Lotka-Volterra model with interspecific competition. Annals of Applied Probability 9:1226-1.259.
39. Ozinga, W. A., C. Römermann, R. M. Bekker, A. Prinzing, W. L. M. Tamis, J. H. J. Schaminée, S. M. Hennekens, K. Thompson, P. Poschlod, M. Kleyer, J. P. Bakker, and J. M. van Groenendael. 2009. Dispersal failure contributes to plant losses in NW Europe. Ecology Letters 12:66-74.
40. Pacala, S. W. 1997. Dynamics of plant communities. Pages 532555 in M. J. Crawley, editor. Plant ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
41. Pacala, S. W., C. D. Canham, J. A. J. Silander, R. K. Kobe, and E. Ribbens. 1996. Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis, and dynamics. Ecological Monographs 66:1-43. (Pubitemid 126623239)
42. Pacala, S. W., and D. H. Deutschman. 1995. Details that matter: The spatial distribution of individual trees maintains forest ecosystem function. Oikos 74:357-365.
43. Pacala, S. W., and S. A. Levin. 1997. Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species. Pages 204-232 in D. Tilman and P, Kareiva, editors. Spatial, ecology: The role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
44. Purves, D. W., and R. Law. 2002. Experimental derivation of functions relating growth of Arabidopsis thaliana to neighbour size and distance. Journal of Ecology 90:882-894.
45. Rees, M., P. J. Grubb, and. D. Kelly. 1996. Quantifying the impact of competition and spatial heterogeneity on the structure and dynamics of a four-species guild of winter annuals. American Naturalist 147:1-32.
46. Snyder, R. E. 2008. When does environmental variation most influence species coexistence? Theoretical Ecology 1:129-139.
47. Snyder, R. E., and P. Chesson. 2003. Local dispersal can facilitate coexistence in the presence of permanent spatial heterogeneity. Ecology Letters 6:301-309.
48. Snyder, R. E., and P. Chesson. 2004. How the spatial, scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity interact to affect coexistence. American Naturalist 164:633650.
49. Stoll, P., and D. Prati. 2001. Intraspecific aggregation alters competitive interactions in experimental plant communities. Ecology 82:319-327. (Pubitemid 32152256)
50. Tilman, D. 1994. Competition and spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2-16.
51. Tilman, D., and P. Kareiva, editors. 1997. Spatial, ecology: The role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton. University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
52. Travis, J. M. J., D. J. Murrell, and C. Dytham. 1999. The evolution of density dependent dispersal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266:1837-1842.
53. Turnbull, L. A., D. Coomes, A. Hector, and M. Rees. 2004. Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: competitive interactions and spatial patterns in a guild of annual plants. Journal of Ecology 92:97-109.
54. Turnbull, L. A., D. A. Coomes, D. W. Purves, and M. Rees. 2007. How spatial structure alters population and. community dynamics in. A natural plant community. Journal of Ecology 95:79-89.
55. Weiner, J., and P. T. Conte. 1981. Dispersal and neighborhood, effects in an annual plant competition model. Ecological Modelling 13:131-147.