Use of the transformative framework in mixed methods studies

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 441-454

  Sweetman, David ^a   Badiee, Manijeh ^a   Creswell, John W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Advocacy; Emancipatory; Mix methods; Mixed methods; Multimethod; Review; Transformative; Triangulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953187335     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800410364610     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bhopal, K. (2000). Gender, race and power in the research process: South Asian women in east London. In C. Truman, D. M. Mertens, & B. Humpries (Eds.), Research and inequality (pp. 67-79). London: UCL.
2. Boland, M., Daly, L., & Staines, A. (2008). Methodological issues in inclusive intellectual disability research: A health promotion needs assessment of people attending Irish Disability Services. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21, 199-209.
3. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113.
4. Buck, G., Cook, K., Quigley, C., Eastwood, J., & Lucas, Y. (2009). Profiles of urban, low SES, African-American girls' attitudes toward science: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 386-410.
5. Cartwright, E., Schow, D., & Herrera, S. (2006). Using participatory research to build an effective type 2 diabetes intervention: The process of advocacy among female Hispanic farmworkers and their families in southeast Idaho. Women & Health, 43(4), 89-109.
6. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Gutmann, M.L., & Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Darlington, Y., & Scott, D. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Ely, R.J. (1995). The power in demography: Women's social construction of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 589-634.
12. *Ferree, M.M. (2003). Resonance and radicalism: Feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 304-344.
13. Filipas, H.H., & Ullman S.E. (2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims from various support sources. Violence and Victims, 16, 673-692.
14. Fisher, D.G., & Needle, R. (1993). AIDS and community-based drug intervention programs: Evaluation and outreach. Gloucestershire, UK: Hawthorne Press.
15. *Freeman, M.L. (2000). Incorporating gender issues in practice with the Satir growth model. Families in Society, 81, 256-268.
16. Hawkins, A.J., Roberts, T.A., & Christiansen, S.L. (1994). An evaluation of a program to help dual-earner couples share the second shift. Family Relations, 43, 213-220.
17. Hill, M., Dillane, J., Bannister, J., & Scott, S. (2002). Everybody needs good neighbours: An evaluation of an intensive project for families facing eviction. Child & Family Social Work, 7, 79-89.
18. *Hodgkin, S. (2008). Telling it all: A story of women's social capital using a mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 296-316.
19. *Hollingsworth, L.D. (2004). Child custody loss among women with persistent severe mental illness. Social Work Research, 28, 199-209.
20. Howe, K.R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 42-61.
21. Kumar, M.S., Mudaliar, S.M., Thyagarajan, S.P., Kumar, S., Selvanayagam, A., & Daniels, D. (2000). Rapid assessment and response to injecting drug use in Madras, south India. International Journal of Drug Policy, 11, 83-98.
22. Leckenby, D., & Hesse-Biber, S.N. (2007). Feminist approaches to mixed-methods research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. L. Leavy (Eds.), Feminist research practice: A primer (pp. 249-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. McMahon, S. (2007). Understanding community-specific rape myths. Affilia, 22, 357-370.
24. Mertens, D.M. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 1-14.
25. Mertens, D.M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Mertens, D.M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 212-225.
27. Mertens, D.M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford.
28. Newman, K., & Wyly, E.K. (2006). The right to stay put, revisited: Gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies, 43(1), 23-57.
29. Nordenmark, M., & Nyman, C. (2003). Fair or unfair? Perceived fairness of household division of labour and gender equality among women and men: The Swedish case. European Journal of Women's Studies, 10, 181-209.
30. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2003). Islamic culture and democracy: Testing the clash of civilizations thesis. In R. Inglehart (Ed.), Human values and social change: Findings from the values surveys (pp. 5-34). Leiden t: E. J. Brill.
31. Rhodes, T., & Hartnoll, R. (1996). AIDS, drugs and prevention: Perspectives on individual and community action. London: Routledge.
32. Riddell, T., Ford-Gilboe, M., & Leipert, B. (2009). Strategies used by rural women to stop, avoid or prevent intimate partner violence. Health Care for Women International, 30, 1-25.
33. Shapiro, M., Setterlund, D., & Cragg, C. (2003). Capturing the complexity of women's experiences: A mixed-method approach to studying incontinence in older women. Affilia, 18, 21-33.
34. Singer, M., Stopka, T., Shaw, S., Santelices, C., Buchanan, D., Teng, W.,et al.(2005). Lessons from the field: From research to application in the fight against AIDS among injection drug users in three New England cities. Human Organization, 64(2), 115-127.
35. Stewart, A.J., & Cole, E.R. (2007). Narratives and numbers: Feminist multiple methods research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 327-344). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Sweetman, D. (2008). Use of the transformative-emancipatory perspective in mixed methods studies: A review and recommendations. Unpublished manuscript.
37. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 671-701). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Tolman, D.L., & Szalacha, L.A. (1999). Dimensions of desire: Bridging qualitative and quantitative methods in a study of female adolescent sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 7-39.
39. Watkins, G.H. (1998, November 5-8). Satisfaction and mentoring: An African American perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 427 596).