Transient dynamics of the flow around a NACA 0015 airfoil using fluidic vortex generators

International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 450-459

  Siauw, W L ^a   Bonnet, J P ^a   Tensi, J ^a   Cordier, L ^a   Noack, B R ^a   Cattafesta, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Flow control; NACA airfoil; Proper Orthogonal Decomposition; Reduced order model; Transient processes; Vortex generators

Indexed keywords

CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; FLOW SEPARATION CONTROL; FLUCTUATION ENERGIES; MODE AMPLITUDES; NEAR WAKE; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITIONS; REDUCED ORDER MODELS; SEPARATION PROCESS; TIME-SCALES; TRANSIENT BEHAVIOR; TRANSIENT DYNAMICS; TRANSIENT PROCESS; VELOCITY FIELD; VORTEX GENERATORS;

ACTUATORS; BOUNDARY LAYERS; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; DYNAMICS; FLOW CONTROL; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TRANSMISSION LINE THEORY; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT; WAKES;

AIRFOILS;

EID: 77953185769     PISSN: 0142727X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2010.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adrian R.J. Stochastic estimation of the structure of turbulent fields. Eddy Structure Identification 1996, Vol. 145. J.-P. Bonnet.
2. Allan, B.G., Juang, J.-N., Raney, D.L., Seifert, A., Pack, L.G., Brown, D.E., 2000. Closed-loop separation control using oscillatory flow excitation. Technical report, ICASE-2000-32, Langley Research Center.
3. Amitay M., Glezer A. Controlled transient of flow reattachment over stalled airfoils. Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl. 2002, 23:690-699.
4. Amitay M., Glezer A. Role of actuation frequency in controlled flow reattachment over a stalled airfoil. AIAA J. 2002, 40(2):209-216.
5. Amitay M., Glezer A. Flow transients induced on a 2D airfoil by pulse-modulated actuation. Exp. Fluids 2006, 40:329-331.
6. Ausseur, J.M., Pinier, J.T., Glauser, M.N., 2006a. Flow separation control using a convective based POD approach. AIAA paper 2006-3017.
7. Ausseur, J.M., Pinier, J.T., Glauser, M.N., Higuchi, H., 2006b. Experimental development of a reduced order model for flow separation control. AIAA paper 2006-1251.
8. Bendat J.S., Piersol A.G. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures 1971, Wiley Interscience.
9. Bergmann M., Cordier L. Optimal control of the cylinder wake in the laminar regime by trust-region methods and POD reduced order models. J. Comp. Phys. 2008, 227:7813-7840.
10. Bergmann M., Cordier L., Brancher J.-P. Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using POD reduced order model. Phys. Fluids 2005, 17(9):097101:1-097101:21.
11. Burl J.B. Linear Optimal Control: H2 and H∞ Methods 1999, Addison-Wesley Publishing.
12. Collis S.S., Joslin R.D., Seifert A., Theofilis V. Issues in active flow control: theory, control, simulation, and experiment. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 2004, 40:237-289.
13. Cordier L., Abou El Majd B., Favier J. Calibration of POD reduced-order models using Tikhonov regularization. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2010, 63(2).
14. Cordier, L., Bergmann, M., 2008a. Proper orthogonal decomposition: an overview. In: Lecture Series 2002-04, 2003-03 and 2008-01 on Post-Processing of Experimental and Numerical Data. Von Kármán Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
15. Cordier, L., Bergmann, M., 2008b. Two typical applications of POD: coherent structures eduction and reduced order modelling. In: Lecture Series 2002-04, 2003-03 and 2008-01 on Post-Processing of Experimental and Numerical Data. Von Kármán Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
16. Darabi A., Wygnanski I. Active management of naturally separated flow over a solid surface. Part 1. The forced reattachment process. J. Fluid Mech. 2004, 510:105-129.
17. Darabi A., Wygnanski I. Active management of naturally separated flow over a solid surface. Part 2. The separation process. J. Fluid Mech. 2004, 510:131-144.
18. Eldredge, R., Bons, J., 2004. Active Control of a Separating Boundary Layer with Steady Vortex Generating Jets. Detailed Flow Measurements. AIAA paper 2004-751.
19. Erm, L.P., 2001. Parametric study of jet/vortex interactions in AMRL water tunnel. Technical report, DSTO-TR-1209, Defense Science and Technology.
20. Greenblatt D., Wygnanski I.J. The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 2000, 36(7):487-545.
21. Haller G. Exact theory of unsteady separation for two-dimensional flows. J. Fluid Mech. 2004, 512:257-311.
22. Hansen L., Bons J. Flow measurements of vortex generator jets in separating boundary layer. J. Propul. Power 2006, 2(3):558-565.
23. Holmes P.J., Lumley J.-L., Berkooz G., Mattingly J.C., Wittenberg R.W. Low-dimensional models of coherent structures in turbulence. Phys. Rep. 1997, 287:337-384.
24. Johnston J.P., Compton D.C. Streamwise vortex production by pitched and skewed jets in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J. 1992, 30(3):640-647.
25. Kostas J., Soria J., Chong M.S. A comparison between snapshot POD analysis of PIV velocity and vorticity data. Exp. Fluids 2005, 38:146-160.
26. Luchtenburg D.M., Guenther B., Noack B.R., King R., Tadmor G. A generalized mean-field model of the natural and high-frequency actuated flow around a high-lift configuration. J. Fluid Mech. 2009, 623:283-316.
27. Lumley, J.L., 1967. Atmospheric turbulence and wave propagation. In: The structure of inhomogeneous turbulence. Nauka, Moscow, pp. 166-178.
28. Mathis R., Lebedev A., Collin E., Delville J., Bonnet J.-P. Experimental study of transient forced turbulent separation and reattachment on a bevelled trailing edge. Exp. Fluids 2009, 46(1):131-146.
29. Pastoor M., Henning L., Noack B.R., King R., Tadmor G. Feedback shear layer control for bluff body drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 2008, 608:161-196.
30. Pastoor, M., Noack, B.R., King, R., Tadmor, G., 2006. Spatiotemporal waveform observers and feedback in shear layer control. In: 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA, 9-12 January 2006, AIAA-Paper 2006-1402.
31. Perret L., Collin E., Delville J. Polynomial identification of POD based low-order dynamical system. J. Turbul. 2006, 7:1-15.
32. Pinier J.T., Ausseur J.M., Glauser M.N., Higuchi H. Proportional closed-loop feedback control of flow separation. AIAA J. 2007, 45(1):181-190.
33. Rapoport D., Fono I., Cohen K., Seifert A. Closed-loop vectoring control of a turbulent jet using periodic excitation. J. Propul. Power 2003, 19(4):646-654.
34. Reynolds W.C., Hussain A.K.M.F. The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. Part 3. Theoretical models and comparisons with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 1972, 54(2):263-288.
35. Seifert A., Greenblatt D., Wygnanski I. Active separation control: an overview of reynolds and mach numbers effects. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2004, 8:569-582.
36. Siauw W.L. Transient process of separation and attachment over a NACA 0015 airfoil controlled by fluidic vortex generators. Thèse de doctorat 2008, University of Poitiers, France.
37. Sondergaard R., Rivir R.B., Bons J.P. Control of low-pressure turbine separation using vortex generators. J. Propul. Power 2002, 18(4):889-895.
38. Stalnov O., Palei V., Fono I., Cohen K., Seifert A. Experimental estimation of a D-shaped cylinder wake using body mounted sensors. Exp. Fluids 2007, 42:531-542.
39. Stanislas M., Okamoto K., Käehler C., Westerweel J., Scarano F. Main results of the third international PIV challenge. Exp. Fluids 2008, 45(1):27-71.
40. Tadmor, G., Lehmann, O., Noack, B.R., Morzyński, M., in press. Mean field Galerkin models for the natural and actuated cylinder wake flow. Phys. Fluids.
41. Tian, Y., Song, Q., Cattafesta, L., 2006. Adaptive Feedback Control of Flow Separation. AIAA paper 2006-3016.