Spatiotemporal waveform observers and feedback in shear layer control

Collection of Technical Papers - 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting

Volumn 22, Issue , 2006, Pages 16863-16871

  Pastoor, Mark ^a   Noack, Bernd R ^a   King, Rudibert ^a   Tadmor, Gilead ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK; FOURIER SERIES; SHEAR BANDS; VORTEX FLOW;

PERIODIC ACTUATION; RECIRCULATION BUBBLE; SPATIOTEMPORAL WAVEFORM OBSERVERS; TEMPORAL HIGH FREQUENCY;

WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

EID: 34250801998     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. A. MICHALKE. On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer. J. Fluid Much. 23, 521 - 544, 1965.
2. P.G. DRAZIN & W.H. REID. Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
3. R. R. RUDERICH & H.H. FERNHOLZ. An experimental investigation of a turbulent shear flow with separation, reverse flow and reattachment. J. Fluid Mech. 163, 283-322, 1985.
4. B. COLLER, B. R. NOACK, S. NARAYANAN, A. BANASZUK & A. I. KHIBNIK. Reduced basis model for active separation control in a planar diffuser flow. AIAA Paper 2000-2562.
5. B.R. NOACK. I. MEZIC, G. TADMOR & A. BANASZUK. Optimal mixing in recirculation zones. Phys. Fluids 16, 867-888, 2004.
6. M.A.Z. HASAN. The flow over a backward-facing step under controlled perturbation: laminar separation. J. Fluid Mech. 238, 73-96, 1992.
7. T. R. BEWLEY. Flow control: new challenges for a new renaissance. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 37, 21 - 58, 2001.
8. M. GUNZBURGER. Perspectives in Flow Control and Optimization. SIAM, 2002.
9. O. AAMO & M. KRSTIC. Flow Control by Feedback Stabilization and Missing. Springer, 2003.
10. R. M. MURRAY (ED.). Control in an Information Rich World: Future Directions in Control, Dynamics, and Systems. SIAM, 2003.
11. L. CATTAFESTA, D.R. WILLIAMS, C.W. ROWLEY & F. ALVI. Review of active control of flow-induced cavity resonance. AIAA Paper 2003-3567.
12. G. TADMOR. Control of a dual drive to attenuate switching frequency ripple in a large permanent magnet synchronous motor. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Tech., 2003.
13. G. TADMOR. Observers and feedback control for a rotating vortex pair. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 12, 36 - 51, 2004.
14. J. GERHARD, M/PASTOOR, R. KING, B.R. NOACK, A. DILLMANN, M. M.ORZYNSKI-& G. TADMOR. Model-based control of vortex shedding using low-dimensional Galerkin models. AIAA Paper 2003-4262.
15. B.R. NOACK, G. TADMOR & M. MORZYNSKI. Low-dimensional models for feedback flow control. Part I: Empirical Galerkin models. AIAA Paper 2004-2408.
16. G. TADMOR, B.R. NOACK, M. MORZYNSKI & S. SIEGEL. Low-dimensional models for feedback flow control. Part.II: Controller design and dynamic estimation. AIAA Paper 2004-2409.
17. B.R. NOACK, K. AFANASIEV, M. MORZYNSKI, G. TADMOR & F. THIELE. A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech. 497, 335-363, 2003.
18. Y.K. SUH. Periodic motion of a point vortex in a corner subject to a potential flow. J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 62, 3441-3445, 1993.
19. D. VAINCHTEIN & I. MEZIĆ. Control off a vortex pair using weak external flow. J. of Turbulence 3, 51, 2002.
20. F. LI & N. AUBRY. Feedback control of flow past a cylinder via transverse motion. Phys. Fluids 15, 2163-2176, 2003.
21. M. PASTOOR, R. KING. B.R. NOACK, A. DILLMANN & G. TADMOR. Model-based coherent-structure control of turbulent shear flows using low-dimensional vortex models. AIAA Paper 2003-4261.
22. B. PROTAS. Linear feedback stabilization of laminar vortex shedding based on a point vortex model. Phys. Fluids 16, 4473-4488, 2004.
23. B.R. NOACK, P. PAPAS & P.A. MONKEWITZ. The need for a pressure-term representation in empirical Galerkin models of incompressible shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 523, 339-365, 2005.
24. C.L. DEMARCO & G.C. VERGHESE. Bringing phasor dynamics into the power system load flow. In North American Power Symposium, 463-469, 1993.
25. G. TADMOR. On approximate phasor models in dissipative, bilinear systems. IEEE Transaction on Circuits & Systems I: Fundamental Theory, 49, 1167 - 1179, 2002.
26. G. TADMOR & A. BANASZUK. Observation feedback control of vortex motion in a recirculation region. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 10, 749 - 755, 2002.
27. T. WEINKAUF, H.-C. HEGE, B.R. NOACK, M. SCHLEGEL & A. DILLMANN. Coherent structures in a transitional flow around a backward-facing step. Phys. Fluids, 15, S3, 2003.
28. J. MABEY. Analysis and correlation of data on pressure fluctuations in seperated flow. JoA 9, 642-645, 1972.
29. R. BECKER, M. GARWON k R. KING. Development of model-based sensors and their use for closed-loop control of separated shear flows. In European Control Conference, University of Cambridge, UK, 2003.
30. R. KING, R. BECKER, M. GARWON & L. HENNING. Robust and adaptive closed-loop control of separated shear flows. AIAA Paper 2004-2519.
31. T. SUZUKI, T. COLONIUS k D. G. MACMARTIN. Inverse technique for vortex imaging arid its application to feedback flow control. AIAA Paper 2003-4260.
32. T. SUZUKI & T. COLONIUS. Inverse-imaging method for detection of a vortex in a channel. AIAA J. 41, 1743-1751, 2003.
33. T. WEINKAUF, B.R. NOACK, P. COMTE, A. DILLMANN AND H.-C. HEGE. Coherent-Structure Skeleton of a Turbulent Mixing Layer. Poster at the Gallery of Fluid Motion 2004. 57th Annual Meeting of the Division of Fluid Dynamics of the American Physical Society. See http://vento.pi.tu-berlin.de/ts/noackbr/Weinkauf2004aps.PDF for details.