Learnability of embedded syntactic structures depends on prosodic cues

Cognitive Science

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 338-349

  Mueller, Jutta L ^a   Bahlmann, Jörg ^a   Friederici, Angela D ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial grammar learning; Hierarchical structures; Prosody; Statistical learning; Syntax

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953165490     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01093.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bach, E., Brown, C., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1985). Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch: A psycholinguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1(4), 1985-1986.
2. Bahlmann, J., Schubotz, R., & Friederici, A.D. (2008). Hierarchical sequencing engages Broca's area. Neuro-Image, 42, 525-534.
3. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
4. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Christophe, A., Gout, A., Peperkamp, S., & Morgan, J.L. (2003). Discovering words in the continuous speech stream: The role of prosody. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 585-598.
6. Christophe, A., Guasti, T., & Nespor, M. (1997). Reflections on phonological bootstrapping: Its role for lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5), 585-612.
7. Crain, S., & Pietroski, P. (2001). Nature, nurture and universal grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, 139-186.
8. Cunillera, T., Gomila, A., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2008). Beneficial effects of word final stress in segmenting a new language: Evidence from ERPs. BMC Neuroscience, 9(23).
9. De Vries, M.H., Monaghan, P., Knecht, S., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: The learnability of embedded hierarchical structures. Cognition, 107(2), 763-774.
10. Elman, J.L., Bates, E.A., Johnson, M.H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Endress, A.D., Scholl, B.J., & Mehler, J. (2005). The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 406-419.
12. Fitch, W.T., & Hauser, M.D. (2004). Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science, 303, 377-380.
13. Friederici, A.D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R.I., & Anwander, A. (2006). The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103(7), 2458-2463.
14. Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W.T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
15. Hochmann, J., Azadpour, M., & Mehler, J. (2008). Do humans really learn An Bn artificial grammars from exemplars? Cognitive Science, 32(6), 1021-1036.
16. Johnson, E.K. (2008). Infants use prosodically conditioned acoustic-phonetic cues to extract words from speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), EL144-EL148.
17. Jusczyk, P.W. (1998). Dividing and conquering the linguistic input. In M.C. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. Olson, & T. Wysocki (Eds.), CLS 34: The Panels (pp. 293-310). Chicago: University of Chicago.
18. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Kidd, E., & Bavin, E.L. (2002). English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses: Evidence for general-dognitive and language-specific constraints on development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(6), 599-617.
20. Männel, C., & Friederici, A.D. (2009). Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(10), 1988-2006.
21. Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P.W., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143-178.
22. Morgan, J.L. (1996). Prosody and the roots of parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 69-106.
23. Morgan, J.L., Meier, R.P., & Newport, E.L. (1987). Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 498-550.
24. Morgan, J.L., & Newport, E.L. (1981). The role of constituent structure in the induction of an artificial language. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 20, 67-85.
25. Nazzi, T., Kemler-Nelson, D., Jusczyk, P.W., & Jusczyk, A.M. (2000). Six-month-olds' detection of clauses embedded in continuous speech: Effects of prosodic wellformedness. Infancy, 1, 123-147.
26. Nazzi, T., & Ramus, F. (2003). Perception and acquisition of linguistic rhythm by infants. Speech Communication, 41, 233-243.
27. Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Richmond, K., & Chater, N. (2005). Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 225-237.
28. Peña, M., Bonatti, L.L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2002). Signal-driven computations in n speech processing. Science, 298, 604-607.
29. Perruchet, P., & Rey, A. (2005). Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(2), 307-313.
30. Piatelli-Palmarini, M. (1989). Evolution, selection and cognition: From "learning" to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language. Cognition, 31, 1-44.
31. Ramus, F., Hauser, M.D., Miller, C.T., Morris, D., & Mehler, J. (2000). Language discrimination by human newborns and cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Science, 288, 349-351.
32. Saffran, J.R. (2001). The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 493-515.
33. Saffran, J.R. (2002). Constraints on statistical learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 172-196.
34. Saffran, J.R., Aslin, R.N., & Newport, E.L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
35. Seidl, A. (2007). Infants' use and weighting of prosodic cues in clause segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 24-48.
36. Shukla, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2007). An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 54(1), 1-32.
37. Soderstrom, M., Seidl, A., Kemler Nelson, D.G., & Jusczyk, P. (2003). The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: Evidence from prelinguistic infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 249-267.
38. Thiessen, E., & Saffran, J. (2003). When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39, 706-716.
39. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Toro, J.M., Nespor, M., Mehler, J., & Bonatti, L.L. (2008). Finding words and rules in a speech stream: Functional differences between vowels and consonants. Psychological Research, 19(2), 137-144.
41. Weinert, S. (1991). Spracherwerb und implizites Lernen. Bern: Hans Huber.
42. White, K.S., Peperkamp, S., Kirk, C., & Morgan, J.L. (2008). Rapid acquisition of phonological alternations by infants. Cognition, 107, 238-265.
43. Yang, C.D. (2004). Universal grammar, statistics of both? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 451-456.