Comparative predictive validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 462-467

  Harris, Susan R ^a   Backman, Catherine L ^a   Mayson, Tanja A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BC CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALBERTA INFANT MOTOR SCALE; ARTICLE; BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT; BIRTH WEIGHT; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HARRIS INFANT NEUROMOTOR TEST; HIGH RISK INFANT; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEWBORN ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77953159796     PISSN: 00121622     EISSN: 14698749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03518.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Palisano RJ. Concurrent and predictive validities of the Bayley Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. Phys Ther 2006, 66:1714-9.
2. Gorski PA, Lewkowicz DJ, Huntington L. Advances in neonatal and infant behavioral assessment: toward a comprehensive evaluation of early patterns of development. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1987, 8:39-50.
3. Heineman KR, Hadders-Algra M. Evaluation of neuromotor function in infancy - a systematic review of available methods. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2008, 29:315-23.
4. Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008, 50:254-66.
5. Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant 1992, Philadelphia, Saunders
6. Harris SR, Megens AM, Backman CL, Hayes VE. Development and standardization of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. Infants Young Child 2003, 16:143-51.
7. Harris SR, Daniels LE. Content validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. Phys Ther 1996, 76:727-37.
8. Harris SR, Daniels LE. Reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. J Pediatr 2001, 139:249-53.
9. Megens AM, Harris SR, Backman CL, Hayes VE. Known-groups analysis of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. Phys Ther 2007, 87:164-9.
10. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development 1993, 2nd edn, San Antonio, TX, Psychological Corporation
11. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development 2006, 3rd edn, San Antonio, TX, Psychological Corporation
12. Jeng SF, Tsou Yau KI, Chen LC, Hsiao SF. Alberta infant motor scale: reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan. Phys Ther 2000, 80:168-78.
13. Blanchard Y, Neilan E, Busanich J, Garavuso L, Klimas D. Interrater reliability of early intervention providers scoring the Alberta infant motor scale. Pediatr Phys Ther 2004, 16:13-8.
14. Piper MC, Pinnell LE, Darrah J, Maguire T, Byrne PJ. Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Can J Public Health 1992, 83(Suppl. 2):S46-50.
15. Liao PM, Campbell SK. Examination of the item structure of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatr Phys Ther 2004, 16:31-8.
16. van Haastert IC, de Vries LS, Helders PJ, Jongmans MJ. Early gross motor development of preterm infants according to the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. J Pediatr 2006, 149:617-22.
17. Darrah J, Piper M, Watt MJ. Assessment of gross motor skills of at-risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998, 40:485-91.
18. Tse L, Mayson TA, Leo S. Concurrent validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. J Pediatr Nurs 2008, 23:28-36.
19. Ethnocultural Portrait of Canada. Visible Minority Groups, 2006. Counts for Canada, Provinces and Territories - 20% Sample Data 2008, www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/highlights/ethnic/pages/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo=PR&Code=01&Table=1&Data=Count&StartRec=1&Sort=2&Display=Page (accessed 18 November 2008)
20. Grieco EM. The White Population: 2000. Census 2000 Brief 2001, http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/c2kbr01-4.pdf, 2001 (accessed 9 September 2009)
21. Ravenscroft EF, Harris SR. Is maternal education related to infant motor development? Pediatr Phys Ther 2007, 19:56-61.
22. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice 2000, 2nd edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall Health
23. Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Singhal A. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Child 2008, 93:458-61.
24. Marks K, Glascoe FP, Aylward GP, Shevell MI, Lipkin PH, Squires JK. The thorny nature of predictive validity studies on screening tests for developmental-behavioral problems. Pediatrics 2008, 122:866-8.
25. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics 2006, 118:1808-9.
26. Harris SR. Parents' and caregivers' perceptions of their children's development. Dev Med Child Neurol 1994, 36:918-23.