The thorny nature of predictive validity studies on screening tests for developmental-behavioral problems

Pediatrics

Volumn 122, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 866-868

  Marks, Kevin ^a,h   Glascoe, Frances Page ^b,h   Aylward, Glen P ^c   Shevell, Michael I ^d   Lipkin, Paul H ^e,f   Squires, Jane K ^g  

^a PeaceHealth Oregon   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^h 25 Bragg Dr ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR DISORDER; CHILD; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HUMAN; NOTE; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW;

CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 54049089220     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-3142     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Wake M, Gerner B, Gallagher S. Does parents' evaluation of developmental status at school entry predict language, achievement, and quality of life 2 years later? Ambul Pediatr. 2005;5(3):143-149
2. Hess CR, Papas MA, Black MM. Use of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener with an environmental risk group. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(5):321-330
3. Harris SR, Daniels LE. Reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. J Pediatr. 2001;139(2):249-253
4. Leonard CH, Piecuch RE, Cooper BA. Use of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener with low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Psychol. 2001;26(1):33-40
5. Aylward GP, Verhulst SJ. Predictive utility of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener (BINS) risk status classifications: clinical interpretation and application. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000; 42(1):25-31
6. Klee T, Carson DK, Gavin WJ, Hall L, Kent A, Reece S. Concurrent and predictive validity of an early language screening program. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41(3):627-624
7. Sturner RA, Funk SG, Green JA. Preschool speech and language screening: further validation of the sentence repetition screening test. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1996;17(6):405-413
8. Rydz D, Srour M, Oskoui M, et al. Screening for developmental delay in the setting of a community pediatric clinic: a prospective assessment of parent-report questionnaires. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/118/4/e1178
9. McCormick MC, Brooks-Gunn J, Buka SL, et al. Early intervention in low birth weight premature infants: results at 18 years of age for the Infant Health and Development Program. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):771-780
10. van Agt HME, van der Stege HA, de Ridder-Sluiter H, Verhoeven LTW, de Koning HJ. A cluster-randomized trial of screening for language delay in toddlers: effects on school performance and language development at age 8. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(6):1317-1325
11. Briggs-Gowan MJ, Carter AS. Social-emotional screening status in early childhood predicts elementary school outcomes. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):957-962
12. Buck AA, Gart JJ. Comparison of a screening test and a reference test in epidemiologic studies: I. Indices of agreement and their relation to prevalence. Am J Epidemiol. 1966;83(3): 586-592
13. Capute AJ, Accardo PJ. A neurodevelopmental perspective on the continuum of developmental disabilities. In: Capute AJ, Accardo PJ, eds. Developmental Disabilities in Infancy and Childhood. 2nd ed. Vol 1. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1996:1-22
14. American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Children With Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics; Bright Futures Steering Committee; Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening [published correction appears in Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1808-1809]. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1): 405-420
15. Shonkoff JP. From neurons to neighborhoods: old and new challenges for developmental and behavioral pediatrics. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24(1):70-76
16. Guralnick MJ. Effectiveness of early intervention for vulnerable children: a developmental perspective. Am J Ment Retard. 1998;102(4):319-345
17. Ramey CT, Ramey SL. Effective early intervention. Ment Retard. 1992;30(6):337-345