The role of similarity in deductive categorical inference

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 938-944

  Calvillo, Dustin P ^a   Revlin, Russell ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644780838     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196789     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ARENI, C. S. (2002). The proposition-probability model of argument structure and message acceptance. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 168-187.
2. BARON, R. M., & KENNY, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. BRAINE, M. D. S., & O'BRIEN, D. P. (1998). Mental logic. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. EDGINGTON, D. (1995). On conditionals. Mind, 104, 235-329.
5. FALLIS, D. (2003). Intentional gaps in mathematical proofs. Synthese, 134, 45-69.
6. GEORGE, R. (1972). Enthymematic consequence. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9, 113-116.
7. GIGERENZER, G., & HOFFRAGE, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian inference without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-704.
8. GOLDSTONE, R. L. (1994). The rule of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125-157.
9. GRENNAN, W. (1994). Are "gap-fillers" missing premises? Informal Logic, 16, 185-196.
10. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., & BYRNE, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
11. KINCANNON, A., & SPLLLMAN, B. A. (2003). The use of category and similarity information in limiting hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 31, 114-132.
12. LEVI, D. S. (1995). The case of the missing premise. Informal Logic, 17, 67-88.
13. MADDEN, E. H. (1952). The enthymeme: Crossroads of logic, rhetoric, and metaphysics. Philosophical Review, 61, 368-376.
14. MARKMAN, A. B. (1997). Constraints on analogical inference. Cognitive Science, 21, 373-418.
15. OSHERSON, D. N., SMITH, E. E., WILKIE, O., LÓPEZ, A., & SHAFIR, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 185-200.
16. REVLIN, R., & HEGARTY, M. (1999). Resolving signals to cohesion: Two models of bridging inference. Discourse Processes, 27, 77-102.
17. RIPS, L. J. (1975). Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 665-681.
18. RIPS, L. J. (2001). Two kinds of reasoning. Psychological Science, 12, 129-134.
19. SLOMAN, S. A. (1993). Feature-based induction. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 231-280.
20. SLOMAN, S. A. (1998). Categorical inference is not a tree: The myth of inheritance hierarchies. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 1-33.
21. SLOMAN, S. A., & RIPS, L. J. (1998). Similarity as an explanatory construct. Cognition, 65, 87-101.
22. SMITH, E. E., SHOBEN, E. J., & RIPS, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241.
23. SORENSEN, R. A. (1988). Are enthymemes arguments? Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 29, 155-159.
24. TVERSKY, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
25. WALLACH, M. A. (1958). On psychological similarity. Psychological Review, 65, 103-116.