Phylogenetic status of Vavilovia formosa (Fabaceae-Fabeae) based on nrDNA ITS and cpDNA sequences

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 313-319

  Oskoueiyan, Roghayeh ^a   Kazempour Osaloo, Shahrokh ^b   Maassoumi, Ali Asghar ^c   Nejadsattari, Taher ^a   Mozaffarian, Valiollah ^c  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FORESTS AND RANGELANDS   (Iran)

Author keywords

Fabaceae; Fabeae; nrDNA ITS; Phylogeny; Pisum; trnL F; trnS G; Vavilovia

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; LEGUME; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

FABACEAE; LATHYRUS; PISUM;

EID: 77953138192     PISSN: 03051978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2010.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Asmussen C.B., and Liston A. Chloroplast DNA characters, phylogeny, and classification of Lathyrus (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85 (1998) 387-401
2. Bobrov E.G. Pisum. In: Komarov V.L., Shishkin B.K., and Bobrov E.G. (Eds). Flora of the USSR. Leguminosae: Oxytropis, Hedysarum vol. 13 (1972), Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem 396-400
3. Cunningham C.W. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 (1997) 733-740
4. Davis P.H. Vavilovia. In: Davis P.H. (Ed). Flora of Turkey vol. 3 (1970), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 372-373
5. Doyle J.J., and Doyle J.J. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19 (1987) 11-15
6. Dzyubenko N.I., and Dzyubenko E. Vavilovia formosa. [Online]. Available at:. In: Afonin A.N., Greene S.L., Dzyubenko N.I., and Frolov A.N. (Eds). Interactive Agricultural Ecological Atlas of Russia and Neighboring Countries. Economic Plants and Their Diseases, Pests and Weeds (2009). http://www.agroatlas.ru/en/content/related/Vavilovia_formosa/
7. Farris J.S., Kallersjo M., Kluge A.G., and Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10 (1995) 315-319
8. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 (1985) 783-791
9. Hamilton M.B. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast regions with intraspecific variation. Mol. Ecol. 8 (1999) 521-523
10. Holmgren P.K., and Holmgren N.H. Index Herbariorum: A Global Directory of Public Herbaria and Associated Staff. Available at: (2008), New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/
11. Kenicer G.J., Kajita T., Pennington R.T., and Murata J. Systematics and biogeography of Lathyrus (Leguminosae) based on internal transcribed spacer and cpDNA sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 92 (2005) 1199-1209
12. Kirkbride J.H., Gunn C.R., and Weitzman A.L. Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae). Tech. Bull. No. 1890 vol. II (2003), United States of Department Agriculture pp. 908-909
13. Kupicha F.K. Vicieae. In: Polhill R.M., and Raven P.H. (Eds). Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 1 (1981), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 377-381
14. Kurzyna-Młynik R., Oskolski A.A., Downie S.R., Kopacz R., Wojewodzka A., and Spalik K. Phylogenetic position of the genus Ferula (Apiaceae) and its placement in tribe Scandiceae as inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence variation. Plant Syst. Evol. 274 (2008) 47-66
15. Larkin M.A., Blackshields G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I.M., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., and Higgins D.G. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23 (2007) 2947-2948
16. Lock J.M., and Simpson K. Legumes of West Asia, a Check List (1991), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
17. Lock J.M., and Maxted N. Fabeae. In: Lewis G., Schrire B., Mackinder B., and Lock M. (Eds). Legumes of the World (2005), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 504-509
18. Mayer M.S., and Bagga S.K. The phylogeny of lens (Leguminosae): new insight from ITS sequence analysis. Plant Syst. Evol. 232 (2002) 145-154
19. Nuin P. MrMTgui 1.0 (version 1.6). Program distributed by the author at (2005). http://www.genedrift.org/mtgui.php
20. Nylander J.A.A. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author (2004), Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University
21. Page D.M. TreeView (Win32) version 1.6.6. Available at: (2001). http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html/
22. Pakravan M. Vicieae-Pisum. In: Assadi M., Maassoumi A.A., Khatamsaz M., and Mozaffarian V. (Eds). Flora of Iran. No. 33 (2000), Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran 148-152
23. Polans N.O., and Saar D.E. ITS sequence variation in wild species and cultivars of pea. Pisum Genet. 34 (2002) 9-14
24. Posada D., and Buckley T. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 793-808
25. Rechinger K.H. Pisum (Papilionaceae I-Vicieae). In: Rechinger K.H. (Ed). Flora Iranica vol. 140 (1979), Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz 83-86
26. Ronquist F., and Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 1572-1574
27. Saar D.E., and Polans N.O. ITS sequence variation in selected taxa of Pisum. Pisum Genet. 32 (2000) 42-45
28. Sang T., Crawford D.J., and Stuessy T.F. Documentation of reticulate evolution in peonies (Paeonia) using internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: implications for biogeography and concerted evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (1995) 6813-6817
29. Spalik K., Wojewódzka A., and Downie S.R. Delimitation of genera in Apiaceae with examples from Scandiceae subtribe Scandicinae. Edinb. J. Bot. 58 (2001) 331-346
30. Steele K.P., and Wojciechowski M.F. Phylogenetic analyses of tribes Trifolieae and Vicieae, based on sequences of the plastid gene matK (Papilionoideae: Leguminosae). In: Klitgaard B.B., and Bruneau A. (Eds). Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 10, Higher Level Systematics (2003), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 355-370
31. Steele K.P., Kenicer G.J., and Wojciechowski M.F. Phylogenetic analyses of genera in the tribes Trifolieae and Fabeae (Leguminosae) using nucleotide sequence data of the plastid gene matK. (abstract). Available at: (2004). http://www.botany2004.org/engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=757
32. Swofford D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (* and Other Methods), version 4 (2002), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass
33. Taberlet P., Gielly L., Pautou G., and Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding region of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17 (1991) 1105-1109
34. Townsend C.C. Pisum. In: Townsend C.C., and Guest E. (Eds). Flora of Iraq vol. 3 (1974), The Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform of the Republic of Iraq 573-579
35. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., and Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J., and White T.J. (Eds). PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (1990), Academic Press, San Diego 315-322
36. Wojciechowski M.F., Sanderson M.J., Steele K.P., and Liston A. Molecular phylogeny of the "temperate herbaceous tribes" of Papilionoid legumes: a supertree approach. In: Herendeen P.S., and Bruneau A. (Eds). Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 9 (2000), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 277-298
37. Wojciechowski M.F., Lavin M., and Sanderson M.J. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Am. J. Bot. 91 (2004) 1846-1862
38. Yankov, I., Golubev, A., 1999. About the taxonomical status of Vavilovia formosa based on the results of crossibility and susceptibility to specialized pathogens. In: XVI International Botanical Congress, Abstract Number, 5655.