Molecular phylogenetic relationships and a revised classification of the subfamily Ericoideae (Ericaceae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 343-354

  Gillespie, Emily ^a   Kron, Kathleen ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bejarieae; Bryantheae; Classification; Empetreae; Ericeae; Ericoideae; Molecular phylogeny; Phyllodoceae; Rhodoreae

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ERICACEAE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, PLANT; ERICACEAE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

BEJARIA; BEJARIEAE; BRYANTHUS; DIPLARCHE; EMPETREAE; ERICACEAE; ERICEAE; ERICOIDEAE; LEDOTHAMNUS; PHYLLODOCEAE; RHODOREAE;

EID: 77953127567     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19 (1974) 716-723
2. Baldwin B.G. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 1 (1992) 3-16
3. Baldwin B.G., Sanderson M.J., Porter J.M., Wojciechowski M.F., Campbell C.S., and Donoghue M.J. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82 (1995) 247-277
4. Barker F.K., and Lutzoni F. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 625-637
5. Bull J.J., Huelsenbeck J.P., Cunningham C.W., Swofford D.L., and Waddell P.J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42 (1993) 384-397
6. Copeland H.F. A study, anatomical and taxonomic, of the genera of Rhododendroideae. Am. Midl. Nat. 30 3 (1943) 533-625
7. Cox H.T. Studies in the comparative anatomy of the Ericales I-Subfamily Rhododendroideae. Am. Midl. Nat. 39 1 (1948) 220-245
8. Cunningham C.W. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 (1997) 733-740
9. Doyle J., and Doyle J. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19 (1987) 11-15
10. Drábková L., Kirschner J., and Vlček C. Comparison of seven DNA extraction and amplification protocols in historical herbarium specimens in Juncaceae. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 20 (2002) 161-175
11. Driskell A.C., Ané C., Burleigh J.G., McMahon M.M., O'Meara B.C., and Sanderson M.J. Prospects for building the Tree of Life from large sequence databases. Science 306 (2004) 1172-1174
12. Drummond, A.J., Kearse, M., Heled, J., Moir, R., Thierer, T., Ashton, B., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., 2006. Geneious v2.5.
13. Evans R.C., Alice L.A., Campbell C.S., Kellogg E.A., and Dickinson T.A. The granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS1) gene in the Rosaceae: multiple loci and phylogenetic utility. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 17 3 (2000) 388-400
14. Farris J.S., Kallersjo M., Kluge A.G., and Bult C. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44 (1995) 570-572
15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 (1985) 783-791
16. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Ann. Rev. Genet. 22 (1988) 521-565
17. Guindon S., and Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52 5 (2003) 696-704
18. Guindon, S., Lethiec, F., Duroux, P., Gascuel, O., 2005. PHYML online-a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 1, 33 (Web Server issue), W557-W559.
19. Hebda R.J., and Chinnappa C.C. Cytological evidence for generic limits in tribe Cladothamneae (Ericaceae). Can. J. Bot. 58 (1980) 1119-1120
20. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 754-755
21. Johnson L.A., and Soltis D.E. MatK DNA sequence and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s.s. Syst. Bot. 19 (1994) 143-156
22. Kron K.A. Phylogenetic relationships of Rhododendroideae (Ericaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84 7 (1997) 973-980
23. Kron K.A., and Chase M.W. Systematics of the Ericaceae, Empetraceae, Epacridaceae and related taxa based on rbcL sequence. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80 3 (1993) 735-741
24. Kron K.A., and King J.M. Cladistic relationships of Kalmia, Leiophyllum, and Loiseleuria (Phyllodoceae, Ericaceae) based on rbcL and nrITS data. Syst. Bot. 21 1 (1996) 17-29
25. Kron K.A., Judd W.S., Stevens P.F., Crayn D.M., Anderberg A.A., Gadek P.A., Quinn C.J., and Luteyn J.L. Phylogenetic classification of Ericaceae: molecular and morphological evidence. Bot. Rev. 68 3 (2002) 335-423
26. Luteyn J.L. Ericaceae-part II. The superior-ovaried genera (Monotropoideae, Pyroloideae, Rhododendroideae, and Vaccinioideae p.p.). Flora Neotrop. Monograph 66 (1995) 107-122
27. Mabberley D.J. The Plant-Book. second ed. (1997), The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 858 pp
28. Mason-Gamer R.J., and Kellogg E.A. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45 (1996) 524-545
29. Moretz, C.C., 2002. A systematic revision of Elliottia using molecular and morphological characters. M.S. Thesis. Wake Forest University.
30. Nylander, J.A.A., 2004. MrAIC.pl. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
31. Oh S.-H., and Potter D. Molecular phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of tribe Neillieae (Rosaceae) using DNA sequences of cpDNA, rDNA, and LEAFY. Am. J. Bot. 92 (2005) 179-192
32. Olmstead R.G., and Sweere J.A. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43 (1994) 467-481
33. Olmstead R.G., Michaels H.J., Scott K.M., and Palmer J.D. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79 (1992) 249-265
34. Philippe H.E., Snell E.A., Bapteste E., Lopez P., Holland P.W.H., and Casane D. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 (2004) 1740-1752
35. Powell E.A., and Kron K.A. Phylogenetics of the wintergreen group (Gaultheria, Pernettya, Diplycosia; Ericaceae). Syst. Bot. 26 (2001) 808-817
36. Ronquist F., and Huelsenbeck J.P. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 1572-1574
37. Shaw J., Lickey E.B., Beck J.T., Farmer S.B., Liu W., Miller J., Siripun K.C., Winder C.T., Schilling E.E., and Small R.L. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am. J. Bot. 92 1 (2005) 142-166
38. Steele K.P., and Vilgalys R. Phylogenetic analyses of Polemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Syst. Bot. 19 (1994) 126-142
39. Stevens, P.F., 1969. Taxonomic studies in the Ericaceae. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Edinburgh.
40. Stevens P.F. A classification of the Ericaceae: subfamilies and tribes. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64 (1971) 1-53
41. Stevens, P.F., 2001 onwards. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 9, June 2008 [and more or less continuously updated since].
42. Swofford D.L. Paup* 4.0b10: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (* and other methods) (2002), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
43. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., and Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (1990), Academic Press, San Diego
44. Wiens J.J. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 528-538
45. Wiens J.J. Can incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long branch attraction?. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 731-742
46. Wiens J.J., and Moen D.S. Missing data and the accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetics. J. Evol. Syst. 46 3 (2008) 307-314
47. Yang Z., and Rannala B. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 (1997) 717-724
48. Yoder A.D., Irwin J.A., and Payseur B.A. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 408-424