Enhanced c-Fos expression in superior colliculus, paraventricular thalamus and septum during learning of cue-reward association

Neuroscience

Volumn 168, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 706-714

  Igelstrom, K M ^a   Herbison, A E ^a   Hyland, B I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Associative learning; Classical conditioning; Fos; Immediate early gene; Pavlovian conditioning; Rat

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN C FOS;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; RAT; REWARD; SEPTUM NUCLEUS; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; THALAMUS MIDLINE NUCLEUS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BIOSYNTHESIS; CONDITIONED REFLEX; METABOLISM; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; LEARNING; MALE; MIDLINE THALAMIC NUCLEI; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-FOS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; REWARD; SEPTAL NUCLEI; SUPERIOR COLLICULI;

EID: 77953120402     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baxter M.G., Murray E.A. The amygdala and reward. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:563-573.
2. Beck C.H., Fibiger H.C. Conditioned fear-induced changes in behavior and in the expression of the immediate early gene c-fos: with and without diazepam pretreatment. J Neurosci 1995, 15:709-720.
3. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B 1995, 57:289-300.
4. Berger T.W., Thompson R.F. Limbic system interrelations: functional division among hippocampal-septal connections. Science 1977, 197:587-589.
5. Berger T.W., Thompson R.F. Neuronal plasticity in the limbic system during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. II: septum and mammillary bodies. Brain Res 1978, 156:293-314.
6. Berry S.D., Thompson R.F. Medial septal lesions retard classical conditioning of the nicitating membrane response in rabbits. Science 1979, 205:209-211.
7. Brown E.E., Robertson G.S., Fibiger H.C. Evidence for conditional neuronal activation following exposure to a cocaine-paired environment: role of forebrain limbic structures. J Neurosci 1992, 12:4112-4121.
8. Buhusi C.V., Schmajuk N.A. Attention, configuration, and hippocampal function. Hippocampus 1996, 6:621-642.
9. Chastrette N., Pfaff D.W., Gibbs R.B. Effects of daytime and nighttime stress on Fos-like immunoreactivity in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, the habenula, and the posterior paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus. Brain Res 1991, 563:339-344.
10. Childress A.R., Ehrman R., Rohsenow D.J., Robbins S.J., O'Brien C.P. Substance abuse: a comprehensive textbook 1997, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
11. Coizet V., Comoli E., Westby G.W., Redgrave P. Phasic activation of substantia nigra and the ventral tegmental area by chemical stimulation of the superior colliculus: an electrophysiological investigation in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 17:28-40.
12. Comoli E., Coizet V., Boyes J., Bolam J.P., Canteras N.S., Quirk R.H., Overton P.G., Redgrave P. A direct projection from superior colliculus to substantia nigra for detecting salient visual events. Nat Neurosci 2003, 6:974-980.
13. Cullinan W.E., Herman J.P., Battaglia D.F., Akil H., Watson S.J. Pattern and time course of immediate early gene expression in rat brain following acute stress. Neuroscience 1995, 64:477-505.
14. Day J.J., Carelli R.M. The nucleus accumbens and Pavlovian reward learning. Neuroscientist 2007, 13:148-159.
15. Deniau J.M., Thierry A.M., Feger J. Electrophysiological identification of mesencephalic ventromedial tegmental (VMT) neurons projecting to the frontal cortex, septum and nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 1980, 189:315-326.
16. Domjan M. Pavlovian conditioning: a functional perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2005, 56:179-206.
17. Dommett E., Coizet V., Blaha C.D., Martindale J., Lefebvre V., Walton N., Mayhew J.E., Overton P.G., Redgrave P. How visual stimuli activate dopaminergic neurons at short latency. Science 2005, 307:1476-1479.
18. Dragunow M., Faull R. The use of c-fos as a metabolic marker in neuronal pathway tracing. J Neurosci Methods 1989, 29:261-265.
19. Genovese C.R., Lazar N.A., Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002, 15:870-878.
20. Goldberg M.E., Wurtz R.H. Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. II. Effect of attention on neuronal responses. J Neurophysiol 1972, 35:560-574.
21. Groenewegen H.J., Berendse H.W. The specificity of the 'nonspecific' midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei. Trends Neurosci 1994, 17:52-57.
22. Ikeda T., Hikosaka O. Reward-dependent gain and bias of visual responses in primate superior colliculus. Neuron 2003, 39:693-700.
23. Jones M.W., Kilpatrick I.C., Phillipson O.T. Regulation of dopamine function in the nucleus accumbens of the rat by the thalamic paraventricular nucleus and adjacent midline nuclei. Exp Brain Res 1989, 76:572-580.
24. Kirouac G.J., Parsons M.P., Li S. Orexin (hypocretin) innervation of the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus. Brain Res 2005, 1059:179-188.
25. Kirouac G.J., Parsons M.P., Li S. Innervation of the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus from cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) containing neurons of the hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol 2006, 497:155-165.
26. Konkle A.T., Bielajew C. Tracing the neuroanatomical profiles of reward pathways with markers of neuronal activation. Rev Neurosci 2004, 15:383-414.
27. Kovacs K.J. c-Fos as a transcription factor: a stressful (re)view from a functional map. Neurochem Int 1998, 33:287-297.
28. Krout K.E., Loewy A.D., Westby G.W., Redgrave P. Superior colliculus projections to midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei of the rat. J Comp Neurol 2001, 431:198-216.
29. Li C., Chen P., Smith M.S. Neural populations in the rat forebrain and brainstem activated by the suckling stimulus as demonstrated by cFos expression. Neuroscience 1999, 94:117-129.
30. Louilot A., Le Moal M., Simon H. Opposite influences of dopaminergic pathways to the prefrontal cortex or the septum on the dopaminergic transmission in the nucleus accumbens. An in vivo voltammetric study. Neuroscience 1989, 29:45-56.
31. Luo A.H., Wise R.A., Lupica C.R., Aston-Jones G. A novel hippocampal projection to the ventral tegmental area: anatomical and electrophysiological analyses. 38th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience 2008, 197.195. Society for Neuroscience, Washington.
32. May P. The mammalian superior colliculus: laminar structure and connections. Prog Brain Res 2006, 151:321-378.
33. McDonald J.H. Handbook of biological statistics 2009, Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, MD.
34. McHaffie J.G., Jiang H., May P.J., Coizet V., Overton P.G., Stein B.E., Redgrave P. A direct projection from superior colliculus to substantia nigra pars compacta in the cat. Neuroscience 2006, 128:221-234.
35. Nishijo H., Kita T., Tamura R., Eifuku S., Terasawa K., Ono T. Motivation-related neuronal activity in the object discrimination task in monkey septal nuclei. Hippocampus 1997, 7:536-548.
36. Olds J., Milner P. Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1954, 47:419-427.
37. Pan W.X., Schmidt R., Wickens J.R., Hyland B.I. Dopamine cells respond to predicted events during classical conditioning: evidence for eligibility traces in the reward-learning network. J Neurosci 2005, 25:6235-6242.
38. Parsons M.P., Li S., Kirouac G.J. The paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus as an interface between the orexin and CART peptides and the shell of the nucleus accumbens. Synapse 2006, 59:480-490.
39. Parsons M.P., Li S., Kirouac G.J. Functional and anatomical connection between the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus and dopamine fibers of the nucleus accumbens. J Comp Neurol 2007, 500:1050-1063.
40. Pinto A., Jankowski M., Sesack S.R. Projections from the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus to the rat prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens shell: ultrastructural characteristics and spatial relationships with dopamine afferents. J Comp Neurol 2003, 459:142-155.
41. Redgrave P., Gurney K. The short-latency dopamine signal: a role in discovering novel actions?. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006, 7:967-975.
42. Redgrave P., Prescott T.J., Gurney K. Is the short-latency dopamine response too short to signal reward error?. Trends Neurosci 1999, 22:146-151.
43. Rhodes J.S., Crabbe J.C. Gene expression induced by drugs of abuse. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2005, 5:26-33.
44. Rhodes J.S., Ryabinin A.E., Crabbe J.C. Patterns of brain activation associated with contextual conditioning to methamphetamine in mice. Behav Neurosci 2005, 119:759-771.
45. Roesch M.R., Calu D.J., Schoenbaum G. Dopamine neurons encode the better option in rats deciding between differently delayed or sized rewards. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:1615-1624.
46. Rokers B., Mercado E., Allen M.T., Myers C.E., Gluck M.A. A connectionist model of septohippocampal dynamics during conditioning: closing the loop. Behav Neurosci 2002, 116:48-62.
47. Sagar S.M., Sharp F.R., Curran T. Expression of c-fos protein in brain: metabolic mapping at the cellular level. Science 1988, 240:1328-1331.
48. Schultz W. Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. J Neurophysiol 1998, 80:1-27.
49. Schultz W., Tremblay L., Hollerman J.R. Changes in behavior-related neuronal activity in the striatum during learning. Trends Neurosci 2003, 26:321-328.
50. Schulz J.M., Redgrave P., Mehring C., Aertsen A., Clements K.M., Wickens J.R., Reynolds J.N. Short-latency activation of striatal spiny neurons via subcortical visual pathways. J Neurosci 2009, 29:6336-6347.
51. Sharp F.R., Sagar S.M., Hicks K., Lowenstein D., Hisanaga K. c-fos mRNA, Fos, and Fos-related antigen induction by hypertonic saline and stress. J Neurosci 1991, 11:2321-2331.
52. Sheehan T.P., Chambers R.A., Russell D.S. Regulation of affect by the lateral septum: implications for neuropsychiatry. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2004, 46:71-117.
53. Sparks D.L. Translation of sensory signals into commands for control of saccadic eye movements: role of primate superior colliculus. Physiol Rev 1986, 66:118-171.
54. Swanson L.W. Brain maps: structure of the rat brain 1998, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
55. Thomas E., Yadin E., Strickland C.E. Septal unit activity during classical conditioning: a regional comparison. Brain Res 1991, 547:303-308.
56. Tischmeyer W., Grimm R. Activation of immediate early genes and memory formation. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999, 55:564-574.
57. Van der Werf Y.D., Witter M.P., Groenewegen H.J. The intralaminar and midline nuclei of the thalamus. Anatomical and functional evidence for participation in processes of arousal and awareness. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2002, 39:107-140.
58. West A.E., Griffith E.C., Greenberg M.E. Regulation of transcription factors by neuronal activity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:921-931.
59. Young C.D., Deutch A.Y. The effects of thalamic paraventricular nucleus lesions on cocaine-induced locomotor activity and sensitization. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1998, 60:753-758.