Voter model on a directed network: Role of bidirectional opinion exchanges

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Han, Sung Guk ^a   Um, Jaegon ^b   Kim, Beom Jun ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORBING STATE; DIRECTED NETWORK; HIERARCHICAL TREE; INFORMATION FLOWS; NETWORK SIZE; VOTER MODELS;

EID: 77953112657     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.057103     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. R. Axelrod, J. Conflict Resolut. 41, 203 (1997) 10.1177/ 0022002797041002001
2. C. Castellano, M. Marsili, and A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3536 (2000) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3536
3. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026120 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026120
4. D. Vilone and C. Castellano, Phys. Rev. E 69, 016109 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.016109
5. F. Vazquez and V. M. Eguíluz, New J. Phys. 10, 063011 (2008). 10.1088/1367-2630/10/6/063011
6. V. Sood and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 178701 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.178701
7. C. Castellano, D. Vilone, and A. Vespignani, Europhys. Lett. 63, 153 (2003) 10.1209/epl/i2003-00490-0
8. X. Castelló, R. Toivonen, V. M. Eguíluz, J. Saramäki, K. Kaski, and M. San Miguel, EPL 79, 66006 (2007) 10.1209/0295-5075/79/66006
9. K. Suchecki, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. San Miguel, Europhys. Lett. 69, 228 (2005) 10.1209/epl/i2004-10329-8
10. K. Suchecki, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 72, 036132 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.036132
11. S. M. Park and B. J. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 74, 026114 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.026114
12. C. Castellano, V. Loreto, A. Barrat, F. Cecconi, and D. Parisi, Phys. Rev. E 71, 066107 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.066107
13. I. Dornic, H. Chaté, J. Chave, and H. Hinrichsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 045701 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.045701
14. L. Frachebourg and P. L. Krapivsky, Phys. Rev. E 53, R3009 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.R3009
15. K. Suchecki and J. A. Holyst, Physica A 362, 338 (2006). 10.1016/j.physa.2005.08.003
16. See, e.g., S. N. Dorogovtsev, A. V. Goltsev, and J. F. F. Mendes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1275 (2008) and references therein. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1275
17. N. Masuda and H. Ohtsuki, New J. Phys. 11, 033012 (2009). 10.1088/1367-2630/11/3/033012
18. M. Á. Serrano, K. Klemm, F. Vazquez, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. San Miguel, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2009), P10024. 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/ 10/P10024
19. A. D. Sánchez, J. M. López, and M. A. Rodríguez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 048701 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.048701
20. T. Nishikawa and A. E. Motter, Phys. Rev. E 73, 065106 (R) (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.065106
21. J. Um, S.-I. Lee, and B. J. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 53, 491 (2008). 10.3938/jkps.53.491
22. See S. Arbesman, J. M. Kleinberg, and S. H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. E 79, 016115 (2009) and references therein. 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.016115
23. Similarly, effects of the existence of a single zealot who has more preference for a particular opinion have been studied in M. Mobilia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 028701 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.028701
24. We also measure the order parameter m S (t) defined as the average over surviving runs, i.e., the time series that decays to the absorbing state σ = - 1 are excluded. As p is increased, m S (t) favors a positive value similarly to m (t). Interestingly, in a broad range of p, m S (t) first decreases and then increases, before it eventually decays to - 1.