Comparison of voter and Glauber ordering dynamics on networks

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 6, 2005, Pages

  Castellano, Claudio ^a,b,c   Loreto, Vittorio ^a,b,c   Barrat, Alain ^b,c   Cecconi, Federico ^c   Parisi, Domenico ^c  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^c INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLAUBER DYNAMICS; VOTER DYNAMICS;

CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 27944464161     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.066107     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. M. E. J. Newman, SIAM Rev. SIREAD 0036-1445 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 45, 167 (2003).
2. K. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C IJMPEO 0129-1831 10.1142/S0129183100000936 11, 1157 (2000);
3. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, and G. Weisbuch, Adv. Complex Syst. 0219-5259 3, 87 (2000);
4. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 1460-7425 5, 2 (2002);
5. P. L. Krapivsky and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.238701 90, 238701 (2003).
6. R. Axelrod, J. Conflict Resolut. 41, 203 (1997).
7. M. Kuperman and D. Zanette, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1007/s10051-002-8978-0 26, 387 (2002).
8. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguiluz, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026120 67, 026120 (2003).
9. D. Stauffer, in The Monte Carlo Method in the Physical Sciences, edited by James E. Gubernatis, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 690 (AIP, Melville, NY, 2003), p. 147.
10. This corresponds to the zero temperature limit of the Metropolis dynamics. Other zero temperature Glauber dynamics can be defined depending on the rate at which moves leaving energy unchanged are accepted. Provided this rate is nonzero, we expect the behavior of the model to be qualitalively the same, its precise value affecting only a rescaling of the temporal scales. When such rate is zero the dynamics is said to be constrained and the behavior may be very different (see C. Godrèche and J. M. Luck, cond-mat/0412077, 2004).
11. M. Leone, A. Vazquez, A. Vespignani, and R. Zecchina, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1140/epjb/e2002-00220-0 28, 191 (2002).
12. V. Spirin, P. L. Krapivsky, and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.036118 63, 036118 (2001);
13. V. Spirin, P. L. Krapivsky, and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.016119 65, 016119 (2002).
14. D. Boyer and O. Miramontes, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.035102 67, 035102 (2003).
15. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/30918 393, 440 (1998).
16. P. L. Krapivsky, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.1067 45, 1067 (1992).
17. S. Redner, A Guide to First-Passage Processes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001).
18. C. Castellano, D. Vilone, and A. Vespignani, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2003-00490-0 63, 153 (2003);
19. D. Vilone and C. Castellano, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.016109 69, 016109 (2004).
20. F. Wu and B. A. Huberman, cond-mat/0407252.
21. K. Suchecki, V. M. Eguiluz, and M. San Miguel, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2004-10329-8 69, 228 (2005).
22. V. Sood and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.178701 94, 178701 (2005).
23. I. Dornic, H. Chaté, J. Chave, and H. Hinrichsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.045701 87, 045701 (2001).
24. B. Bollobas, Random Graphs (Academic Press, New York, 1985).
25. A.-L. Barabasi and R. Albert, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 286, 509 (1999).
26. F. Slanina and H. Lavicka, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1140/epjb/e2003-00278-0 35, 279 (2003).
27. S. N. Dorogovtsev, J. F. F. Mendes, and A. N. Samukhin, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.062101 63, 062101 (2001).
28. A. Barrat and R. Pastor-Satorras, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036127 71, 036127 (2005).
29. P. Svenson, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.036122 64, 036122 (2001).
30. O. Häggström, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 310, 275 (2002).
31. E. M. Bollt and D. ben-Avraham, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/026 7, 26 (2005).