Effects of cognitive aging on credibility assessment of online health information

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 4321-4326

  Liao, Qingzi Vera ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive aging; Design for the elderly; Web credibility

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE ABILITY; COGNITIVE AGING; CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT; ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODELS; HEALTH INFORMATIONS; OLDER ADULTS; ONLINE HEALTH INFORMATION; WEB CONTENT; WEB FEATURES;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

DESIGN;

EID: 77953111540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753846.1754147     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E. The Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42, 1(1982), 116-131.
2. Chin, J., Fu, W.-T., &Kannampallil, T. Adaptive Information Search: Age-Dependent Interactions between Cognitive Profiles and Strategies. In Proc of CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1683-1692.
3. Eysenbach, G. Credibility of Health Information and Digital Media: New Perspective and Implications for Youth Digital Media, Youth and Credibility, MIT Press (2008), 123-154.
4. Fogg, B.J. Prominence-Interpretation Theory: Explaining How People Assess Credibility Online. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 722-723.
5. Fogg, B.J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D.R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E.R. How Do Users Evaluate the Credibility of Web Sites? A Study with Over 2500 Participants. In Proc. DUX2003, ACM Press (2003), 1-15.
6. Hasher, L., Zacks, R.T. Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and A New View. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 22 (1988), 193-258.
7. Hong, T. The Influence of Structural and Message Features on Web Site Credibility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 57, 1 (2005), 114-127..
8. Mata, R., Schooler, L. J., &Rieskamp, J.. The aging decision maker: cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and aging, 22(2007), 796-810. (Pubitemid 351173590)
9. Metzger, M.J. Making Sense of Credibility on the Web: Models for Evaluating Online Information and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science58, 13 (2007), 2078-2091.
10. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. The Elaboration Likelyihood Model. Adcences in Experimental Social Psychology19 (1986), 123-205.
11. Pornpitakpan, C. The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34, 2 (2004), 243-281 (Pubitemid 38318194)
12. Rieh, S.Y. Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 53, 2 (2002), 145-161.
13. Rieh, S.Y., Danielson, D.R. Credibility: A Multidisciplinary Framework. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41 (2007), 307-364.
14. Salthouse, T.A. Mediation of Adult Age Difference in Cognition by Reduction in Working Memory and Speed of Processing. Psychological Science 2, 3 (1991), 179-183
15. Sundar, S.S., The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility. Digital Media, Youth and Credibility, MIT Press(2008): 73-100.