Multi-fidelity design optimization of transonic airfoils using physics-based surrogate modeling and shape-preserving response prediction

Journal of Computational Science

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 98-106

  Leifsson, Leifur ^a   Koziel, Slawomir ^a  

^a REYKJAVIK UNIVERSITY   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Aerodynamics; Airfoil shape optimization; Design optimization; Surrogate models

Indexed keywords

AIRFOIL SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; AIRFOIL SURFACES; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; CROSS SECTIONAL AREA; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN PROCESS; DISTURBANCE EQUATION; FUNCTION CALLS; HIGH FIDELITY; HIGH FIDELITY MODELS; HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATIONS; LOW-FIDELITY MODELS; OPTIMIZATION PROCESS; PHYSICS-BASED; PRESSURE DRAG; RESPONSE PREDICTION; SEARCH ALGORITHMS; SHAPE-PRESERVING; SIMULATION MODEL; SURROGATE MODEL; SURROGATE MODELING; TRANSONIC AIRFOILS;

AERODYNAMICS; AIRFOILS; DESIGN; EULER EQUATIONS; FUEL ADDITIVES; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 77953084639     PISSN: 18777503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2010.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Chen N., Zhang H., Huang W., and Xu Y. Study on aerodynamic design optimization of turbomachinery blades. Journal of Thermal Sciences 14 December (4) (2005)
2. Saha G., Suzuki K., and Kai H. Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms in shallow water. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 9 July (2) (2004)
3. Gundlach J.F., Tetrault P., Gern F., Nagshineh-Pour A., Ko A., Schetz J.A., Mason W.H., Kapania R., Grossman B., and Haftka R.T. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Strut-Braced Wing Transonic Transport". 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 2000-0420. 10-13 January (2000)
4. Hosder S., Schetz J.A., Grossman B., and Mason W.H. Airframe Noise Modeling Appropriate for Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization". 2nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 2004-0698. 5-8 January (2004)
5. Vanderplaats G.N. Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design. 3rd edition (1999), Vanderplaats Research and Development
6. Hicks R.M., Murman E.M., and Vanderplaats G. "An Assessment of Airfoil Design by Numerical Optimization" NASA TM-3092 (July 1974)
7. Jameson A. Aerodynamic Design via Control Theory. Journal of Scientific Computing 3 (1988) 233-260
8. Reuther J., and Jameson A. Control Theory Based Airfoil Design for Potential Flow and a Finitie Volume Discretization," AIAA Paper 94-0499. AIAA 32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, January (1994)
9. Jameson A., and Reuther J. Control Theory Based Airfoil Design using Euler Equations. Proceedings of AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Panama City Beach, September (1994) 206-222
10. Kim S., Alonso J.J., and Jameson A. "Design Optimization of High-Lift Configurations Using a Viscous Continuous Adjoint Method," AIAA paper 2002-0844. AIAA 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reno, NV, January (2002)
11. Leoviriyakit K., Kim S., and Jameson A. Viscous Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wings including Planform Variables". 21st Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Orlando, Florida, June 23-26 (2003)
12. Reuther J., Jameson A., Alonso J.J., Rimlinger M.J., and Sauders D. Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computing. 35th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 97-0103, January 6-9 (1997)
13. Queipo N.V., Haftka R.T., Shyy W., Goel T., Vaidyanathan R., and Tucker P.K. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 41 January (1) (2005) 1-28
14. Alexandrov N.M., Nielsen E.J., Lewis R.M., and Anderson W.K. First-Order Model Management with Variable-Fidelity Physics Applied to Multi-Element Airfoil Optimization. 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization. Long Beach, CA, AIAA Paper 2000-4886, September (2000)
15. Robinson T.D., Eldred M.S., Willcox K.E., and Haimes R. Surrogate-based optimization using multifidelity models with variable parameterization and corrected space mapping. AIAA Journal 46 November 11 (2008)
16. Bandler J.W., Cheng Q.S., Dakroury S.A., Mohamed A.S., Bakr M.H., Madsen K., and Sondergaard J. Space mapping: the state of the art. IEEE Transactions Microwave Theory and Techniques 52 January (1) (2004) 337-361
17. Koziel S., Bandler J.W., and Madsen K. A space mapping framework for engineering optimization: theory and implementation. IEEE Transactions Microwave Theory and Techniques 54 10 (2006) 3721-3730
18. Koziel S., Cheng Q.S., and Bandler J.W. Space mapping. IEEE Microwave Magazine 9 6 (Dec 2008) 105-122
19. Redhe M., and Nilsson L. Using space mapping and surrogate models to optimize vehicle crashworthiness design". 9th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Symp. Atlanta, GA, September (2002) Paper AIAA-2002-5536
20. Koziel S. Efficient optimization of microwave circuits using shape-preserving response prediction. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig, Boston, MA (2009) 1569-1572
21. Abbott I.H., and Von Doenhoff A.E. Theory of Wing Sections (1959), Dover Publications
22. Anderson J.D. Modern Compressible Flow-With Historical Prespective. Third edition (2003), McGraw-Hill
23. FLUENT. ver. 6.3.26 (2006), ANSYS Inc., 275, Southpointe Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317
24. GAMBIT. ver. 2.4.6 (2006), ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317
25. Murman E.M., Bailey F.R., and Johnson M.L. TSFOIL-A Computer Code for the Two-dimensional Transonic Calculations, including Wind-tunnel Wall Effects and Wave-drag Evaluation", NASA SP-347. Part II (1975) pp. 769-788
26. Simpson T.W., Peplinski J., Koch P.N., and Allen J.K. Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Engineering with Computers 17 July (2) (2001) 129-150
27. Smola A.J., and Schölkopf B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing 14 August (3) (2004) 199-222