Comparing conventional and wavefront-optimized LASIK for the treatment of hyperopia

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 356-363

  Durrie, Daniel S ^a   Smith, Ryan T ^a   Waring IV, George O ^a   Stahl, Jason E ^a   Schwendeman, Frank J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; EXCIMER LASER; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMILEUSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNCORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEA; CORNEAL WAVEFRONT ABERRATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS, EXCIMER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 77953068699     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090617-07     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Binder PS, Rosenshein J. Retrospective comparison of 3 laser platforms to correct myopic spheres and spherocylinders using conventional and wavefront-guided treatment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1158-1176.
2. Padmanabhan P, Mrochen M, Basuthkar S, Viswanathan D, Joseph R. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:389-397.
3. Marcos S, Barbero S, Llorente L, Merayo-Lloves J. Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:3349-3356.
4. Endl MJ, Martinez CE, Klyce SD, McDonald MB, Coorpender SJ, Applegate RA, Howland HC. Effect of larger ablation zone and transition zone on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1159-1164.
5. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:201-207.
6. Mrochen M, Donitzky C, Wüllner C, Löffler J. Wavefront-optimized ablation profiles: theoretical background. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:775-785.
7. Krueger RR, Rocha KM. Introduction to wavefront-optimized, wavefront-guided, and topography-guided customized ablation: fifth year in review. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S417-S418.
8. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:S596-S601.
9. Nanba A, Amano S, Oshika T, Uno T, Toshino A, Ohashi Y, Yamaguchi T, Mihashi T. Corneal higher order wavefront aberrations after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:46-51. (Pubitemid 40144424)
10. Yoon G, MacRae S, Williams DR, Cox IG. Causes of spherical aberration induced by laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:127-135.
11. Roberts C. The cornea is not a piece of plastic. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:407-413.
12. Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Hong JW, Lee JS, Choi R, Mohan RR. The wound healing response after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy; elusive control of biological variability and effect on custom laser vision correction. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;199:889-896.
13. Huang D, Tang M, Shekhar R. Mathematical model of corneal surface smoothing after laser refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:267-278.
14. Kanellopoulos AJ, Conway J, Pe LH. LASIK for hyperopia with the Wavelight excimer laser. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:43-47.
15. Kezirian GM, Moore CR, Stonecipher KG. Four-year postoperative results of the US ALLEGRETTO WAVE clinical trial for the treatment of hyperopia. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S431-S438.
16. Brint SF. Higher order aberrations after LASIK for myopia with Alcon and Wavelight lasers: a prospective randomized trial. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:S799-S803.
17. Tran DB, Shah V. Higher order aberrations comparison in fellow eyes following IntraLase LASIK with Wavelight Allegretto and CustomCornea LADARVision4000 systems. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:S961-S964.
18. Stonecipher KG, Kezirian GM. Wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE: three-month results of a prospective FDA trial. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S424-S430.
19. Waring GO IV, Durrie DS. Emerging trends for procedure selection in contemporary refractive surgery: consecutive review of 200 cases from a single center. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S419-S423.
20. Kaiserman I, Hazarbassanov R, Varssano D, Grinbaum A. Contrast sensitivity after wavefront-guided LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:454-457.
21. Perez-Santonja JJ, Sakla HF, Alió JL. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:183-189.
22. Mutyala S, McDonald MB, Scheinblum KA, Ostrick MD, Brint SF, Thompson H. Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1864-1867.
23. Montés Micó R, Charman WN. Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:646-651.