Retrospective comparison of 3 laser platforms to correct myopic spheres and spherocylinders using conventional and wavefront-guided treatments

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1158-1176

  Binder, Perry S ^a   Rosenshein, Joseph ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EXCIMER LASER; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PUPIL; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL FLAPS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 34250780066     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.040     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Munnerlyn C.R., Koons S.J., and Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 14 (1988) 46-52
2. Mrochen M., Kaemmerer M., and Seiler T. Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 27 (2001) 201-207
3. Applegate R.A. Limits to vision: can we do better than nature?. J Refract Surg 16 (2000) S547-S551
4. Klyce S.D., Karon M.D., and Smolek M.L. Advantages and disadvantages of the Zernike expansion for representing wave aberration of the normal and aberrated eye. J Refract Surg 20 (2004) S537-S541
5. Kawesch G.M., and Kezirian G.M. Laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia with the VISX Star laser. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 653-661
6. McDonald M.B., Carr J.M., Frantz J.M., et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia up to -11 diopters with up to -5 diopters of astigmatism with the Summit Autonomous LADARVision excimer laser system. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 309-316
7. Flanagan G.W., and Binder P.S. Precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis in 4428 eyes. J Refract Surg 19 (2003) 113-123
8. Jabbur N.S., and Kraff C. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using the WaveScan system for correction of low to moderate myopia with astigmatism: 6-month results in 277 eyes; the Visx Wavefront Study Group. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1493-1501
9. Brint S.F. Higher order aberrations after LASIK for myopia with Alcon and WaveLight lasers: a prospective randomized trial. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) S799-S803
10. Binder P.S. Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laser. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 26-32
11. Binder P.S. One thousand consecutive IntraLase laser in suit keratomileusis flaps. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 962-969
12. Koller T., Iseli H.P., Hafezi F., et al. Q-factor customized ablation profile for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 584-589
13. Flanagan G., and Binder P.S. Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 1674-1683
14. Woolson R.F., and Clarke W.R. Comparing more than two groups of observations; analysis of variance for comparing groups. In: Woolson R.F., and Clarke W.R. (Eds). Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Biomedical Data, 2nd ed (2002), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY chapt 10
15. Armitage P., Berry G., and Matthews J.N.S. Analysing non-normal data. In: Armitage P., Berry G., and Matthews J.N.S. (Eds). Statistical Methods in Medical Research (2002), Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK chapt 10
16. Woolson R.F., and Clarke W.R. Comparing more than two groups of observations; rank analysis of variance for group comparisons. In: Woolson R.F., and Clarke W.R. (Eds). Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Biomedical Data, 2nd ed (2002), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY chapt 11
17. Tukey J.W. Exploratory Data Analysis (1977), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
18. Warden L, Binder PS, Dreher A, Sverdrup L. Performance of a new binocular wavefront aberrometer based on a self-imaging diffractive sensor. In press, J Cataract Refract Surg
19. Kezirian G.M., Drum B., and Eydelman M. Systematic evaluation of wavefront-guided outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1306-1313
20. Phusitphoykai N., Tungsiripat T., Siriboonkoom J., and Vongthongsri A. Comparison of conventional versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the same patient. J Refract Surg 19 (2003) S217-S220
21. Kim T.-I., Yang S.-J., and Tchah H. Bilateral comparison of wavefront-guided versus conventional laser in situ keratomileusis with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix. J Refract Surg 20 (2004) 432-438
22. Twa M.D., Lembach R.G., Bullimore M.A., and Roberts C. A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 173-183
23. Slade S. Contralateral comparison of Alcon CustomCornea and VISX CustomVue wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: one month results. J Refract Surg 20 (2004) S601-S605
24. Tran D.B., Sarayba M.A., Bor Z., et al. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes; potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 97-105
25. Netto M.V., Ambrósio Jr. R., Shen T.T., and Wilson S.E. Wavefront analysis in normal refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) 332-338
26. Applegate R.A., Marsack J.D., Ramos R., and Sarver E.J. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 1487-1495