Efficacy of cartilage palisade tympanoplasty: Randomized controlled trial

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 589-595

  Cabra, Jesús ^a   Moñux, Alfonso ^a  

^a La Mancha Centro General Hospital   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Otitis media; Randomized controlled trialVSurgery; Tympanoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARDRUM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OTITIS MEDIA; PLASTIC SURGERY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TYMPANOPLASTY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CARTILAGE; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OTITIS MEDIA; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TYMPANIC MEMBRANE; TYMPANOPLASTY;

EID: 77953046607     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181dbb35e     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sale CS. Myringoplasty with subcutaneus tissue graft. Arch Otolaryngol 1969;89:494-8.
2. Heermann H. Trommelfellplastik mit fasciengewebe von musculus temporalis nach begradigung der vorderen gehorgangswand. HNO 1961;9:136-7.
3. Claros-Domenech A. Cent tympanoplasties pratiquées à l'aide d'un greffe libre de membrane pèriostique. Rev Laryngol 1959;80:917.
4. Goodhill V. Tragal perichondrium and cartilage in tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 1967;85:480.
5. Heermann J. Experiences with autograft fascia connective tissue of the temporal muscle in tympanoplasties and obliteration of the mastoid cavity cartilage plate from the stapes to the lower tympanic ring (abstract). Z Laryng Rhinol (Stuttgart) 1962;41:141-55.
6. Marquet J. Reconstructive microsurgery of the eardrum by means of tympanic membrane homograft. Acta Otolaryngol 1966;62:459-64.
7. Zini C, Sanna M, Bacciu S, et al. Molded tympanic heterograft:an eight years experience. Am J Otol 1985;6:253-6.
8. Arroyo R, Machado A. Miringoplastias. In: Olaizola F, Gomez-Ullate R, eds. Timpanoplastia. Madrid: DOYMA, 2003:128-38.
9. Gerber MJ, Mason JC, Lambert PR. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1994-9.
10. Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part I: Historical review of the literature. Laryngoscope 1997;107:1-25.
11. Amedee RG. Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 1989;10:447-50.
12. Bernal Sprekelsen M, Tomás Barberán M. Indicaciones, técnica y resultados anatómicos de la timpanoplaqstia con cartílago en empalizada. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1997;48:279-86.
13. Dornhoffer J. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1, 000-patient series. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1844-56.
14. Dornhoffer JL. Surgical management of the atelectatic ear. Am J Otol 2000;21:315-21.
15. Neumann A, Schultz-Coulon HJ, Jahnke K. Type III tympanoplasty applying the palisade cartilage technique: a study of 61 cases. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:33-7.
16. Committee on hearing and equiliqbrium. Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:186-7.
17. Zhang J, Yu K. What's the relative risk. A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998;280:1690-1.
18. Moher D, Schulz K, Altman DG, and for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:657-62. (Pubitemid 32322244)
19. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Number needed to treat (table of examples). University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. Available at: http://www.cebm.utoronto.ca/glossary/nnts.htm#table. Accessed December 2008.
20. Hamed M, Samir M, El Bigermy M. Fate of cartilage material used in middle ear surgery light and electron microscopy study. Auris Nasus Larynx 1999;26:257-62.
21. Rudderman RH, Guvoron B, Mendelsohn G. The fate of fresh and preserve crush autogenous cartilage in rabbit model. Ann Plast Surg 1994;32:250-4.
22. Murbe D, Zahnert T, Bornitz M, et al. Acoustic properties of different cartilage reconstruction techniques of the tympanic membrane. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1769-76.
23. Zahnert T, Huttenbrink KB, Murbe D, et al. Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction. Am J Otol 2000;21:322-8.
24. Eavey RD. Inlay tympanoplasty: cartilage butterfly technique. Laryngoscope 1998;108:657-61.
25. Solmaz MA, Yucel EA, Ozdemir M, et al. Comparison of hearing levels and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques: preliminary results. (Abstract). Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2002;9:271-4.
26. Uzun C, Cayé-Thomasen P, Andersen J, et al. A tympanometric comparison of tympanoplasty with cartilage palisades or fascia after surgery for tensa cholesteatoma in children. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1751-8.
27. Kazikdas KC, Onal K, Boyraz I, et al. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:985-9.
28. Ozbek C, Ciftci O, Tuna EE, et al. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:679-83.