Texture analysis of IKONOS satellite imagery for urban land use and land cover classification

Imaging Science Journal

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 163-170

  Kabir, S ^a   He, D C ^b   Sanusi, M A ^a   Wan Hussina, W M A ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Classification; High resolution; Satellite imagery; Texture analysis; Urban environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953014028     PISSN: 13682199     EISSN: 1743131X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/136821909X12581187860130     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Kiema, J. B. K. Texture analysis and data fusion in the extraction of topographic objects from satellite imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens., 2002, 23, 767-776.
2. Shaban, M. A. and Dikshit, O. Improvement of classification in urban areas by the use of textural features: the case study of Lucknow city, Uttar Pradesh. Int. J. Remote Sens., 2001, 22, 565-593.
3. Smith, G. M. and Fuller, R. M. An integrated approach to land cover classification: an example in the Island of Jersey. Int. J. Remote Sens., 2001, 22, 3123-3142.
4. Moskal, L. M. and Franklin, S. E. 'Classifying multilayer forest structure and composition using high resolution compact airborne spectrographic imager image texture', Research report, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA, 2001.
5. Natural Resources Canada. Canadian Topographic Maps - Sherbrooke Region, 1 : 50 000, 2000 (Centre for Topographic Information, Natural Resources Canada, Sherbrooke, Que.).
6. Haralick, R. M., Shanmugan, K. and Dinstein, I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1973, 8, 610-621.
7. Karathanassi, V., Iossifidis, C. H. and Rokos, D. A texture-based classification method for classifying built areas according to their density. Int. J. Remote Sens., 2000, 21, 1807-1823.
8. Richards, J. A. and Jia, X. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction. 1999, 3rd edition (Springer-Verlag, New York).
9. Pultz, T. J. and Brown, R. J. SAR image classification of agricultural targets using first- and second-order statistics. Can. J. Remote Sens., 1987, 13, 85-91.
10. Gong, P., Marceau, D. and Howarth, P. J. A comparison of spatial feature extraction algorithms for land use classification with SPOT HRV data. Remote Sens. Environ., 1992, 40, 137-151.
11. Mather, P. M., Tso, B. and Koch, M. An evaluation of the Landsat TM spectral data and SAR-derived textural information for lithological discrimination in the Red Sea Hills, Sudan. Int. J. Remote Sens., 1998, 19, 587-604.
12. Laur, H. 'Analyse d'images radar en télédétection: discriminateurs radiométriques et texturaux', Thèses de doctorat, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, 1989.
13. Fung, T. and Ledrew, E. The determination of optimal threshold levels for change detection using various accuracy indices. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 1988, 54, 1449-1454.