Synergistic effects of hyperbaric oxygen and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on postoperative adhesion formation in a rat cecal abrasion model

Bratislava Medical Journal

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 115-120

  Kece, Can ^a   Yildiz, Fahrettin ^a   Simsek, Abdurrahman ^a   Tahir Ozer, M ^a   Deveci, Salih ^a   Ozgurtas, Taner ^a   Sadir, Serdar ^a   Korkmaz, Ahmet ^a   Korkmaz, Ozgur ^a   Ersoz, Nail ^a   Tufan, Turgut ^a  

^a GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adhesion formation; GCSF; Hyperbaric oxygen; Postoperative adhesions

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYPROLINE; RECOMBINANT GRANULOCYTE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CECUM; HYPERBARIC OXYGEN; MALE; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SUBCUTANEOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; TISSUE ADHESION;

ANIMALS; CECUM; FILGRASTIM; HYDROXYPROLINE; HYPERBARIC OXYGENATION; INJECTIONS, SUBCUTANEOUS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 77953010294     PISSN: 00069248     EISSN: 13360345     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Tittel A, Treutner KH, Titkova S, Öttinger A, Schumpelic V. New adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 44-46.
2. Ozogul Y, Baykal A, Onat D, Renda N, Sayek I. An experimental study of the effect of aprotinin on intestinal adhesion formation. Am J Surg 1998; 175: 137-141.
3. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G. Anastomotic integrity after operations for large bowel cancer: A multicenter study. Brit Med J 1980; 281: 411-414.
4. Khoury GA, Waxman BP. The healing process and sutured anastomoses. A review. Brit J Surg 1983; 70: 61-63.
5. Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T, Aydin S, Sahin DA. The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen on Normal and Ischemic Colon Anastomoses. Am J Surg 1998; 176: 458-461.
6. Stephens FO, Hunt TK. Effect of changes in inspired oxygen and carbon dioxyde tensions on wound tensile strength: An experimental study. Ann Surg 1971; 173: 515-519.
7. Hunt TK, Zederfeldt B, Goldstick TK. Oxygen and healing. Am J Surg 1969; 118: 521-525.
8. Knighton D, Silver I, Hunt T. Regulation of wound healing and angiogenesis-effect of oxygen gradients and inspired oxygen concentrati ons. Surgery 1981; 90: 262-270.
9. Tandara AA, Mustoe TA. Oxygen in Wound Healing-More than a Nutrient. World J Surg 2004; 28 (3): 294-300.
10. Ninikowski-2 Marx RE. Radiation injury to tissue. 447-503. In: Kindwall EP (Ed). Hyperbaric Medicine Practice Flagstaff AZ, Best Publishing Company, 1994.
11. Wattel F. European Committee Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Oxygen in the Treatment of Foot Lesions in Diabetic Patients. ECHM. Glaxo-Welcome, France, 1998.
12. Buras J. Basic mechanisms of hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2000; 38 (1): 91-109.
13. Pados GA, Devroey P. Adhesions. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1992; (4): 412-18.
14. Erdem E, Dine S, Erdem D, Ustüin H, Caydere M, Alagöl H. Effects of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and GM-CSF on anastomotic healing: An experimental study in rats. J Surg Res 2002; 108 (1): 1-6.
15. Roilides E, Walsh TJ, Pizzo PA, Rubin M. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor enhances the phagocytic and bactericidal activity of normal and defective human neutrophils. J Infect Dis 1991; 163: 579-583.
16. Sartorelli KH, Silver GM, Gamelli RL. The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) upon burn-induced defective neutrophil chemotaxis. J Trauma 1991; 31: 523-529; discussion 529-530.
17. Raderer M, Kornek G, Hejna M, Koperna K, Scheithauer W, Base W. Topical granulocyte - macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with cancer and impaired wound healing. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 263-270.
18. Arnold F, O'Brien J, Cherry G. Granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor as an agent for wound healing. J Wound Care 1995; 4: 400-402.
19. Jyung RW, Wu L, Pierce GF, Mustoe TA. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: Differential action on incisional wound healing. Surgery 1994; 115: 325-234.
20. Groves RW, Schmidt-Lucke JA. Recombinant human GM-CSF in the treatment of poorly healing wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 2000; 13: 107-112.
21. Dine S, Alagol H, Gulcelik MA, Ozbirecikli B, Kuru B, Renda N. Locally applied granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor improves the impaired bowel anastomoses in rats with long-term corticosteroid treatment. World J Surg 2002; 26: 1208-1213.
22. Gulcelik MA, Dine S, Bir F, Elitok O, Alagol H, Oz M. Locally applied molgramostim improves wound healing at colonic anastomoses in rats after ligation of the common bile duct. Can J Surg 2005; 48 (3): 213-218.
23. Jones TC. The effects of rhGM-CSF on macrophage function. Eur J Cancer 1993; 29 (Suppl 13): 10-13.
24. Krause TJ, Goldsmith NK, Ebner S, Zazanis GA, McKinnon RD. An inhibitor of cell proliferation associated with adhesion formation is suppressed by N,O-car-boxymethyl chitosan. J Invest Surg 1998; 11: 105-113.
25. Evans DM, McAree K, Guyton DP. Dose dependency and wound healing aspects of the use of tissue plasminogen activator in the preven tion of intra-abdominal adhesions. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 229-232.
26. Jamall IS, Finelli VN, Que Hee SS. A Simple Method Determine Nanogram Levels of 4-Hydroxyproline in Biological Tissues. Analytical Biochemistry 1981; 112; 70-75.
27. Ellis H, Moran DJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999; 353:1476-1480.
28. Ellis H. The clinical significance of adhesions: Focus on intestinal obstruction. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997; 577: 5-9.
29. Avital S, Bollinger T, Wilkinson JD, Marchetti F, Hellinger MD, Sands LR. Preventing intra-abdominal adhesions with polylactic acid film: An animal study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 153-157.
30. Hull MG, Glazener CM, Kelly NJ. Population study of causes, treatment and outcome of infertility. Br J Surg 1985; 291: 693-710.
31. Arikan S, Adas G, Barut G, Toklu AS, Kocakusak A, Uzun H et al. An evaluation of low molecular weight heparin and hyperbaric oxygen treatment in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions and wound healing. Am J Surg 2005; 189 (2): 155-160.
32. Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions - how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990; 72: 60-63.
33. Gomel V, Urman B, Giirgan T. Pathophysiology of adhesion for mation and strategies for prevention. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 35-41.
34. Menger MD, Vollmar B. Surgical trauma: Hyperinflammation vs mmunosuppression? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004; 389: 475-484.
35. Faist E, Schinkel C, Zimmer S. Update on the mechanisms of im-munosuppression of injury and immunemodulation. World J Surg 1996; 20: 454-459.
36. Romeo C, Cruccetti A, Turiaco A, Impellizzeri P, Turiaco N, Di Bela C et al. Monocyte and neutrophil activity after minor surgical stres. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 741-744.
37. Ellis H. The causes and prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1971; 133: 497-511.
38. Grim PS, Gottlieb LJ, Boddie A, Batson E. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Amer Med Ass 1990; 263: 2216-2220.
39. Tompach PC, Lew D, Stoll JL. Cell response to hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Int J Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 82-86.
40. Marx RE, Ehler WJ, Tayapongsak P, Pierce LW. Relationship of oxygen dose to angiogenesis induction in irradiated tissue. Am J Surg 1990; 160: 519-524.
41. Roberts GP, Harding KG. Stimulation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis in cultured fibroblasts by hyperbaric oxygen. Br J Dermatol 1994; 131:630-633.
42. Knighton DR, Halliday B, Hunt TK. Oxygen as an antibiotic. A comparison of the effects of inspired oxygen concentration and antibiotic administration on in vivo bacterial clearance. Arch Surg 1986; 121: 191-195.
43. Wang J, Li F, Calhoun JH, Mader JT. The role and effectiveness of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of musculoskeletal disorders. J Postgrad Med 2002; 48: 226-231.
44. Tsuchiya M, Nomura H, Asano S, Kaziro Y, Nagata S. Characte rization of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor produced in mouse cells. EMBO 1987; 6: 611-616.
45. Kilic D, Sayan H, Gönül B. The effect of GM-CSF on glutathione and lipid peroxidation in a rat model. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000; 26: 701-704.
46. Shamseddine AI, Khalil AM, Kibbi AG, Abu Nasr TA, Seoud MA, El Saghir NS. Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor for treatment of chemotherapy Extravasation. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1998; 19: 479-481.
47. El Saghir NS, Bizri AR, Shabb NS. Pressure ulcer accelerated he aling with local injections of granulocyte macrophagecolony stimula ting factor. J Infect 1997; 35: 179-182.
48. Cetinkaya K. GM-CSF improves impaired anastomotic wound he aling in rats treated with intraperitoneal mitomycin-C. Surgery Today 2005; 35 (4): 290-294.
49. Demirer S. Effect of recombinant human GM-CSF on the healing of colonic anastomosis in rats. J Invest Surg 2001; 14 (4): 221-225.
50. Ergin E. The effects of the immunomodulators on the colonic anastomosis in an experimental model of intraperitoneal sepsis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004; 51 (56): 439-442.
51. Groves RW, Schmidt-Lucke JA. Recombinant human GM-CSF in the treatment of poorly healing wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 2000; 13: 107-112.
52. Dine S, Alagol H, Gulcelik MA, Ozbirecikli B, Kuru B, Renda N. Locally applied granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor improves the impaired bowel anastomoses in rats with long-term corticosteroid treatment. World J Surg 2002; 26: 1208-1213.
53. Erdem E, Dine S, Erdem D, Ustun H, Caydere M, Alagol H. Effects of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and GM-CSF on anastomotic healing: An experimental study in rats. J Surg Res 2002; 108: 1-6.
54. Haney AF, Doty E. The formation of coalescing peritoneal adhesions requires injury to both contacting peritoneal surfaces. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 767-775.
55. Van Hinsbergh VW, Kooistra T, Scheffer MA, Hajo van Bockel J, van Muijen GN. Characterization and fibrinolytic properties of human omental tissue mesothelial cells: Comparison with endothelial cells. Blood 1990; 75: 1490-1497.
56. Altuntas I, Tahran O, Delibas N, Cetin R, Süt•ü R. Seprafilm reduces adhesions to polypropylene mesh and increases peritoneal HP. Am Surg 2002; 68: 759-761.
57. Milligan DW, Raftery AD. Observations on the pathogenesis of peritoneal adhesions: A light and electron microscopical study. Brit J Surg 1974; 61: 274-278.