War Games: Evaluating Interactive Simulation Software for the Battlefield and the Board Room

10th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 3288-3293

  Cane, Sheila A ^a   Aronson, Jay E ^b   McCarthy, Richard V ^c  

^a MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interactive simulation; perceived usefulness; performance impacts; task technology fit

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DECISION MAKING; MANAGERS;

DECISION MAKING PROCEDURE; INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS; OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PERFORMANCE IMPACT; SIMULATION SOFTWARE; STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT; TASK CHARACTERISTICS; TASK TECHNOLOGY FIT; TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT MODELS;

PERSONNEL TRAINING;

EID: 77952996393     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
2. Delone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable, Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95
3. Delone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
4. Dishaw, M. T., and Strong, D. M. (1998). Supporting Software Maintenance with Software Engineering Tools: A Computed Task-Technology Fit analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software, 44, 107-120.
5. Dishaw, M. T., and Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs. Information & Management, 36, 9-21.
6. Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems. Management Science, 41(12), 1827-1844.
7. Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
8. Law, A. M., & Kelton, W. D. (2000). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
9. McCarthy, R. V. (2002). Measuring the Validity of Task-Technology Fit for Knowledge Management Systems. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, H. Wayne Huizenga School of Business and Entrepreneurship, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
10. Proctor, M. D., and Gubler, J. C. (1998). Military Simulation Worlds and Organizational Learning: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 1998, December, Washington, DC
11. Rolands and Associates (2003). Joint Theater Level Simulation Executive Overview. http://www.rolands.com/Home/Projects/Project_index.htm
12. Seila, A. F., Ceric, V., and Tadikamalla, P. (2003). Applied Simulation Modeling. Belmont, CA: Thompson Learning.
13. Shirani, A. I., Tafti, M. H. A., and Affisco, J. F. (1999). Task and Technology Fit: A Comparison of Two Technologies for Synchronous and Asynchronous Group Communication. Information & Management, 36, 139-150.
14. th ed. Upper Saddle River, Prentice-Hall.
15. Zigurs, I., and Buckland, B., K. (1998). A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22, 313-334.