Predicting energy balance for dairy cows using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism information

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 2757-2764

  Verbyla, K L ^a,b,c,d   Calus, M P L ^a   Mulder, H A ^a   de Haas, Y ^a   Veerkamp, R F ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Dairy cow; Energy balance; Genetic variation; Genomic selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CATTLE; ENERGY METABOLISM; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; ENERGY METABOLISM; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

BOS; FRIESIA;

EID: 77952974808     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2928     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agenäs S., Burstedt E., Holtenius K. Effects of feeding intensity during the dry period. 1. Feed intake, body weight, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86:870-882.
2. Barendse W., Reverter A., Bunch R.J., Harrison B.E., Barris W., Thomas M.B. A validated whole-genome association study of efficient food conversion in cattle. Genetics 2007, 176:1893-1905.
3. Butler W.R., Smith R.D. Interrelationships between energy-balance and postpartum reproduction function in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72:767-783.
4. Calus M.P.L., Meuwissen T.H.E., de Roos A.P.W., Veerkamp R.F. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 2008, 178:553-561.
5. Coffey M.P., Simm G., Oldham J.D., Hill W.G., Brotherstone S. Genotype and diet effects on energy balance in the first three lactations of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:4318-4326.
6. Daetwyler H.D., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS One 2008, 3:e3395.
7. Darwash A.O., Lamming G.E., Woolliams J.A. The potential for identifying heritable endocrine parameters associated with fertility in post-partum dairy cows. Anim. Sci. 1999, 68:333-347.
8. Dewhurst R.J., Moorby J.M., Dhanoa M.S., Evans R.T., Fisher W.J. Effects of altering energy and protein supply to dairy cows during the dry period. 1. Intake, body condition, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:1782-1794.
9. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Longmans Green, Harlow, UK. 4th ed.
10. Friggens N.C., Berg P., Theilgaard P., Korsgaard I.R., Ingvartsen K.L., Lovendahl P., Jensen J. Breed and parity effects on energy balance profiles through lactation: Evidence of genetically driven body energy change. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:5291-5305.
11. Garnsworthy P.C., Lock A., Mann G.E., Sinclair K.D., Webb R. Nutrition, metabolism, and fertility in dairy cows: 1. Dietary energy source and ovarian function. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:3814-3823.
12. Garnsworthy P.C., Lock A., Mann G.E., Sinclair K.D., Webb R. Nutrition, metabolism, and fertility in dairy cows: 2. Dietary fatty acids and ovarian function. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:3824-3833.
13. George E.I., McCulloch R.E. Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1993, 88:881-889.
14. Gilmour A.R., Gogel B.J., Cullis B.R., Thompson R. ASREML Program User Manual 2006, VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK. 2nd ed.
15. Goddard M. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 2009, 136:245-257.
16. Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., Goddard M.E. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:433-443.
17. Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Technical note: Prediction of breeding values using marker-derived relationship matrices. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86:2089-2092.
18. Hegarty R.S., Goopy J.P., Herd R.M., McCorkell B. Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85:1479-1486.
19. Huttmann H., Stamer E., Junge W., Thaller G., Kalm E. Analysis of feed intake and energy balance of high-yielding first lactating Holstein cows with fixed and random regression models. Animal 2009, 3:181-188.
20. Jorritsma R., Wensing T., Kruip T.A.M., Vos P., Noordhuizen J. Metabolic changes in early lactation and impaired reproductive performance in dairy cows. Vet. Res. 2003, 34:11-26.
21. Klinge C.M., Silver B.F., Driscoll M.D., Sathya G., Bambara R.A., Hilf R. Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor interacts with estrogen receptor, binds to estrogen response elements and half-sites, and inhibits estrogen-induced gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:31465-31474.
22. Kurihara I., Lee D.K., Petit F.G., Jeong J., Lee K., Lydon J.P., DeMayo F.J., Tsai M.J., Tsai S.Y. COUP-TFII mediates progesterone regulation of uterine implantation by controlling ER activity. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:1053-1064.
23. Li L.P., Xie X., Qin J., Jeha G.S., Saha P.K., Yan J., Haueter C.M., Chan L., Tsai S.Y., Tsai M.J. The nuclear orphan receptor COUP-TFII plays an essential role in adipogenesis, glucose homeostasis, and energy metabolism. Cell Metab. 2009, 9:77-87.
24. McNamara S., Murphy J.J., O'Mara F.P., Rath M., Mee J.F. Effect of milking frequency in early lactation on energy metabolism, milk production and reproductive performance of dairy cows. Livest. Sci. 2008, 117:70-78.
25. McNamara S., Murphy J.J., Rath M., O'Mara F.P. Effects of different transition diets on energy balance, blood metabolites and reproductive performance in dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 84:195-206.
26. Meuwissen T.H.E., Goddard M.E. Mapping multiple QTL using linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis information and multitrait data. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2004, 36:261-279.
27. Miglior F., Muir B.L., Van Doormaal B.J. Selection indices in Holstein cattle of various countries. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:1255-1263.
28. Nakshatri H., Mendonca M.S., Bhat-Nakshatri P., Patel N.M., Goulet R.J., Cornetta K. The orphan receptor COUP-TFII regulates G2/M progression of breast cancer cells by modulating the expression/activity of p21(WAF1/CIP1), cyclin D1, and cdk2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 270:1144-1153.
29. Petersson K.J., Berglund B., Strandberg E., Gustafsson H., Flint A.P.F., Woolliams J.A., Royal M.D. Genetic analysis of postpartum measures of luteal activity in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:427-434.
30. Petit F.G., Jamin S.P., Kurihara I., Behringer R.R., DeMayo F.J., Tsai M.J., Tsai S.Y. Deletion of the orphan nuclear receptor COUP-THII in uterus leads to placental deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:6293-6298.
31. Pryce J.E., Royal M.D., Garnsworthy P.C., Mao I.L. Fertility in the high-producing dairy cow. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004, 86:125-135.
32. Royal M.D., Darwash A.O., Flint A.P.E., Webb R., Woolliams J.A., Lamming G.E. Declining fertility in dairy cattle: Changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Anim. Sci. 2000, 70:487-501.
33. Sherman E.L., Nkrumah J.D., Li C., Bartusiak R., Murdoch B., Moore S.S. Fine mapping quantitative trait loci for feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87:37-45.
34. Simm G., Veerkamp R.F., Persaud P. The economic performance of dairy cows of different predicted genetic merit for milk solids production. Anim. Prod. 1994, 58:313-320.
35. Takamoto N., Kurihara I., Lee K., DeMayo F.J., Tsai M.J., Tsai S.Y. Haploinsufficiency of chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor II in female reproduction. Mol. Endocrinol. 2005, 19:2299-2308.
36. van der Lende T., Kaal L., Roelofs R.M.G., Veerkamp R.F., Schrooten C., Bovenhuis H. Infrequent milk progesterone measurements in daughters enable bull selection for cow fertility. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:3953-3957.
37. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
38. Veerkamp R.F. Selection for economic efficiency of dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: A review. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81:1109-1119.
39. Veerkamp R.F., Beerda B., van der Lende T. Effects of genetic selection for milk yield on energy balance, levels of hormones, and metabolites in lactating cattle, and possible links to reduced fertility. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 83:257-275.
40. Veerkamp R.F., Oldenbroek J.K., Van Der Gaast H.J., Van Der Werf J.H.J. Genetic correlation between days until start of luteal activity and milk yield, energy balance, and live weights. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:577-583.
41. Watters R.D., Wiltbank M.C., Guenther J.N., Brickner A.E., Rastani R.R., Fricke P.M., Grummer R.R. Effect of dry period length on reproduction during the subsequent lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:3081-3090.
42. Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., VanRaden P.M., Matukumalli L.K., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S., Van Tassell C.P. Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:3431-3436.
43. Xu Q., Walther N., Jiang H. Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor II (COUP-TFII) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 gamma (HNF-4 gamma) and HNF-4 alpha regulate the bovine growth hormone receptor 1A promoter through a common DNA element. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2004, 32:947-961.
44. Xu Z., Yu S., Hsu C.H., Eguchi J., Rosen E.D. The orphan nuclear receptor chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II is a critical regulator of adipogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:2421-2426.