Ecophysiological response of Crambe maritima to airborne and soil-borne salinity

Annals of Botany

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 925-937

  De Vos, Arjen C ^a   Broekman, Rob ^a   Groot, Maartje P ^a   Rozema, Jelte ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Antioxidant capacity; Crambe maritima; Ecophysiology; Halophyte; K+; Leaf succulence; Na +; Osmotic potential; Phenolics; Proline; Relative growth rate; Root zone salinity; Salt spray; Salt tolerance; Specific leaf area

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANTIOXIDANT; CATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); CULTIVATION; DRY MATTER; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; GROWTH RESPONSE; HALOPHYTE; HERB; LEAF AREA; OSMOSIS; PHENOLIC COMPOUND; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; POTASSIUM; SALINITY TOLERANCE; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARTICLE; CRAMBE; DRUG EFFECT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; SALINITY; SALT TOLERANCE; SOIL;

CRAMBE PLANT; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; SALINITY; SALT-TOLERANCE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SOIL;

CRAMBE MARITIMA;

EID: 77952966191     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq072     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abdelgadir EM, Oka M, Fujiyama H. 2005. Characteristics of nitrate uptake by plants under salinity. Journal of Plant Nutrition 28: 33-46.
2. Agarie S, Shimoda T, Shimizu Y, et al.. 2007. Salt tolerance, salt accumulation, and ionic homeostasis in an epidermal bladder-cell-less mutant of the common ice plant Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 1957-1967.
3. Alcamo J, Florke M, Marker M. 2007. Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socio-economic and climatic changes. Hydrological Sciences 52: 247-275.
4. Ashraf M, Harris PJC. 2004. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Science 166: 3-16.
5. Barbour MG. 1978. Salt spray as a microenvironmental factor in the distribution of beach plants at Point Reyes, California. Oecologia 32: 213-224.
6. Barbour MG, De Jong TM, Pavlik BM. 1985. Marine beach and dune communities. In: Chabot BF, Mooney HA. eds. Physiological ecology of North American plant communities. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall, 296-322.
7. Baron M, Binet P. 1964. Quelques aspects physiologiques de la germination des semences de Crambe maritima L. Bulletin de la Societe Francaise de Physiologie Vegetale 10: 263-267.
8. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205-207.
9. Bell HL, O'Leary JW. 2003. Effects of salinity on growth and cation accumulation of Sporobolus virginicus (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 90: 1416-1424.
10. Breckle S-W. 2002. Salinity, halophytes and salt affected natural ecosystems. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge U. eds. Salinity: environment-plants-molecules. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 53-77.
11. Briard M, Horvais A, Péron J.-Y. 2002. Wild seakale (Crambe maritima L.) diversity as investigated by morphological and RAPD markers. Scientia Horticulturae 95: 1-12.
12. Boyce SG. 1951. Salt hypertrophy in succulent dune plants. Science 114: 544-545.
13. Boyce SG. 1954. The salt spray community. Ecological Monographs 24: 29-67.
14. Chisari M, Todaro A, Barbagallo RN, Spagna G. 2010. Salinity effects on enzymatic browning and antioxidant capacity of fresh-cut baby Romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Duende). Food Chemistry 119: 1502-1506.
15. Clapham AR, Tutin TG, Warburg EF. 1962. Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135.
16. Debez A, Ben Hamed K, Grignon C, Abdelly C. 2004. Salinity effects on germination, growth, and seed production of the halophyte Cakile maritima. Plant and Soil 262: 179-189.
17. Debez A, Koyro H-W, Grignon C, Abdelly C, Huchzermeyer B. 2008. Relationship between the photosynthetic activity and the performance of Cakile maritima after log-term salt treatment. Physiologia Plantarum 133: 373-385.
18. De Jong TM. 1979. Water and salinity relations of Californian beach species. Journal of Ecology 67: 647-663.
19. Dimmit MA, Wiens JF, Van Devender TR. 2005. Extreme succulent plant diversity on cerro Colorado near San Ignacio, Baja California Sur. In: Cartron J-LE, Ceballos G, Felger RS. eds. Biodiversity, ecosystems, and conservation in Northern Mexico. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 249-263.
20. Erickson DL, Young DR. 1995. Salinity response, distribution, and possible dispersal of a barrier island strand glycophyte, Strophostyles umbellate (Fabaceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 122: 95-100.
21. FAO. 2004. Economic valuation of water resources in agriculture. FAO Water Report No. 27. Rome: FAO.
22. FAO and IFAD. 2006. Water for food, agriculture and rural livelihoods. In: Water a shared responsibility. World Water Development Report No. 2. Paris: UNESCO, 243-274.
23. Flowers TJ. 1985. Physiology of halophytes. Plant and Soil 89: 41-56.
24. Flowers TJ. 2004. Improving crop salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 307-319.
25. Flowers TJ, Colmer TD. 2008. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist 179: 945-963.
26. Flowers TJ, Troke PF, Yeo AR. 1977. The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 28: 89-121.
27. Flowers TJ, Hajibagheri MA, Clipsom NJW. 1986. Halophytes. The Quarterly Review of Biology 61: 313-337.
28. Fusheng L, Peron J, Blanchard N. 1998. Effect of different pre-treatments to overcome the dormancy of seakale (Crambe maritima L.) seeds. Acta Horticulturae 467: 233-244.
29. Garnier E, Laurent G. 1994. Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species. New Phytologist 128: 725-736.
30. Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C, Laurent G. 2001. A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Functional Ecology 15: 688-695.
31. Ghars MA, Parre E, Debez A, et al.. 2008. Comparative salt tolerance analysis between Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila, with special emphasis on K + /Na + selectivity and proline accumulation. Journal of Plant Physiology 165: 588-599.
32. Geissler N, Hussin S, Koyro H-W. 2009. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration ameliorates effects of NaCl salinity on photosynthesis and leaf structure of Aster tripolium L. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 137-151.
33. Glenn EP, Brown JJ, Blumwald EJ. 1999. Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 18: 227-255.
34. Grattan SR, Grieve CM. 1999. Salinity-mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Scientia Horticulturae 78: 127-157.
35. Greaver TL, Sternberg LSL. 2007. Fluctuating deposition of ocean water drives plant function on coastal sand dunes. Global Change Biology 13: 216-223.
36. Griffiths ME. 2006. Salt spray and edaphic factors maintain dwarf stature and community composition in coastal sandplain heathlands. Plant Ecology 186: 69-86.
37. Halliwell B. 2006. Polyphenols: antioxidant treats for healthy living or covert toxins? Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86: 1992-1995.
38. Horwood AR. 1919. British wild flowers in their natural haunts, Vols 2-4. London: Gresham Publishing.
39. Hunt R, Causton DR, Shipley B, Askew AP. 2002. A modern tool for classical plant growth analysis. Annals of Botany 90: 485-488.
40. Ignaciuk R, Lee JA. 1980. The germination of four annual strand-line species. New Phytologist 84: 581-591.
41. Jennings DH. 1976. The effects of sodium chloride on higher plants. Biological Reviews 51: 433-486.
42. Karschon R. 1958. Leaf absorption of wind-borne salt and leaf scorch in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. Ilanoth 4: 5-25.
43. Knight SL, Rogers RB, Smith MAL, Spomer LA. 1992. Effects of NaCl salinity on miniature dwarf tomato Micro-Tom'. I. Growth analysis and nutrient composition. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15: 2315-2327.
44. Koyro H-W. 2003. Study of potential cash crop halophytes by a quick check system: determination of the threshold of salinity tolerance and the ecophysiological demands. In: Lieth H, Mochtchenko M. eds. Cash crop halophytes: recent studies. Tasks for Vegetation Science No. 38. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 5-17.
45. Koyro H-W, Lieth H. 2008. Global water crisis: the potential of cash crop halophytes to reduce the dilemma. In: Lieth H, Garcia Sucre M, Herzog B. eds. Mangroves and halophyes: restoration and utilisation. Tasks for Vegetation Science No. 43. The Netherlands: Springer, 7-19.
46. Lambers H, Poorter H. 2004. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. In: Caswell H. ed. Advances in ecological research, Vol.34. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press, 283-362.
47. Lee JA, Ignaciuk R. 1985. The physiological ecology of strandline plants. Vegetatio 62: 319-326.
48. Lee JA, Harmer R, Ignaciuk R. 1983. Nitrogen as a limiting factor in plant communities. In: Lee JA, McNeill S, Rorison IH. eds. Nitrogen as an ecological factor. Oxford: Blackwell, 95-112.
49. Lieth H, Moschenko M, Lohmann M, Koyro H-W, Hamdy A. 1999. Halophyte uses in different climates. I. Ecological and ecophysiological studies. Leiden: Backhuys.
50. Longstretch DJ, Nobel PS. 1979. Salinity effects on leaf anatomy. Plant Physiology 63: 700-703.
51. Maas EV, Hoffman GJ. 1977. Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 103: 115-134.
52. Mansour MMF. 2000. Nitrogen containing compounds and adaptation of plants to salinity stress. Biologia Plantarum 43: 491-500.
53. Martin WE, Clements FE. 1939. Adaptations and origin in the plant world. 1. Factors and functions in coastal dunes. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication No. 521.
54. MegdicheW, Ben Amor N, Debez A, et al.. 2007. Salt tolerance of the annual halophyte Cakile maritima as affected by the provenance and the developmental stage. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 29: 375-384.
55. Mennema J, Quené-Boterenbrood AJ, Plate CL. 1985. Atlas van de Nederlandse Flora 2. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.
56. Munns R. 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant, Cell & Environment 16: 15-24.
57. Munns R. 2001. Avenues for increasing salt tolerance of crops. In: Horst WJ, Schenk MK, Burkert A, et al. eds. Plant nutrition-food security and sustainability of agro-ecosystems. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 370-371.
58. Munns R. 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytologist 167: 645-663.
59. Munns R, Tester M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59: 651-681.
60. Munns R, Husain S, Rivelli AR, et al.. 2002. Avenues for increasing salt tolerance of crops, and the role of physiologically based selection traits. Plant and Soil 247: 93-105.
61. Murphy J, Riley JP. 1962. A modified single solution method for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27: 31-36.
62. Niinemets Ü . 1999. Components of leaf dry mass per area, thickness and density, alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants. New Phytologist 144: 35-47.
63. Oosting HJ. 1945. Tolerance of salt spray of plants of coastal dunes. Ecology 26: 85-89.
64. Oosting HJ, Billings WD. 1942. Factors affecting vegetational zonation on coastal dunes. Ecology 23: 131-142.
65. Pakeman RJ. 1990. Mineral nutrition of strandline annuals. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester.
66. Parida AK, Das AB. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 60: 324-349.
67. Péron J-Y. 1990. Seakale: a new vegetable produced as etiolated sprouts. In: Janick J, Simon JE. eds. Advances in new crops. Portland, OH: Timber Press, 419-422.
68. Poorter H, Garnier E. 2007. Ecological significance of inherent variation in relative growth rate and its components. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F. eds. Functional plant ecology. New York, NY: CRC Press, 67-100.
69. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Biology & Medicine 26: 1231-1237.
70. Rozema J, Flowers T. 2008. Crops for a salinized world. Science 322: 1478-1480.
71. Rozema J, Bijl F, Dueck T, Wesselman H. 1982. Salt-spray stimulated growth in strandline species. Physiologia Plantarum 56: 204-210.
72. Rozema J, Dueck T, Wesselman H, Bijl F. 1983. Nitrogen dependent growth stimulation by salt in strand-line species. Acta Oecologica/Oecologia Plantarum 4: 41-52.
73. Scott GAM, Randall RE. 1976. Biological flora of the British isles: Crambe maritima L. Journal of Ecology 64: 1077-1091.
74. Shennan C, Hunt R, Macrobbie EAC. 1987. Salt tolerance in Aster tripolium L. I. The effect of salinity on growth. Plant, Cell & Environment 10: 59-65.
75. Smedema LK, Shiati K. 2002. Irrigation and salinity: a perspective review of the salinity hazards of irrigation development in the arid zone. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 16: 161-174.
76. Storey R, Wyn-Jones RG. 1979. Responses of Atriplex spongiosa and Suaeda monoica to salinity. Plant Physiology 63: 156-162.
77. Szabolcs I. 1994. Soils and salinisation. In: Pessarakali M. ed. Handbook of plant and crop stress. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 3-11.
78. Tominaga T, Kobayashi H, Ueki K. 1991. Clonal variation in salt tolerance of Imperata cylindrical L. Beauv. var. koenigii (Retz.) et Schinz. Journal of Japanese Grassland Science 37: 69-75.
79. Ullrich WR. 2002. Salinity and nitrogen nutrition. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge U. eds. Salinity: environment-plants-molecules. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 229-248.
80. Van der Meijden R. 2005. Heukels' Flora van Nederland, 23st edn. Groningen/Houten: Wolters-Noordhoff.
81. Vile D, Garnier E, Shipley B, et al.. 2005. Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves. Annals of Botany 96: 1129-1136.
82. Walmsley CA, Davy AJ. 1997. Germination characteristics of shingle beach species, effect of seed ageing and their implications for vegetation restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 131-142.
83. Waterman PG, Mole S. 1994. Analysis of phenolic plant metabolites. In: Lawton JH, Likens GE. eds. Methods in ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 80-90.
84. Wells BW, Shunk IV. 1938. Salt spray: an important factor in coastal ecology. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 65: 485-492.
85. Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG. 1999. Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytologist 143: 155-162.
86. Wyn Jones G, Gorham J. 2002. Intra- and inter-cellular compartments of ions. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge U. eds. Salinity: environment-plants- molecules. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 159-180.
87. Xiong L, Zhu J-K. 2002. Salt tolerance. In: Meyerowitz EM, Somerville CR. eds. The arabidopsis book, Vol.24, issue 1. Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Biologists, 1-22.
88. Yemm EW,Willis AJ. 1954. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochemical Journal 57: 508-514.
89. Yeo AR. 1983. Salinity resistance: physiologies and prices. Physiologia Plantarum 58: 214-222.
90. Yeo AR. 1999. Predicting the interaction between the effects of salinity and climate change on crop plants. Scientia Horticulturae 78: 159-174.
91. Yura H. 1997. Comparative ecophysiology of Chrysanthemum pacificum Nakai and Solidago altissima L. 1. Why S. altisimma cannot be established on the seashore. Ecological Research 12: 313-323.
92. Zhu J-K. 2001. Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science 6: 66-71.