Inter-jurisdictional economic development: A political institution explanation for policy choice

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 379-389

  Hawkins, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Governing institutions; Local government cooperation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952942766     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01900691003696890     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Andrew, S. A. (2009). Regional integration through contracting networks: An empirical analysis of institutional collective action framework. Urban Affairs Review, 44 (3), 378-402.
2. Banks, M. (2000). A changing electorate in a majority Black city: The emergence of a neoconservative black urban regime in contemporary Atlanta. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22, 265-278.
3. Bartik, T. (1992). The effects of state and local taxes on economic development: A review of recent research. Economic Development Quarterly, 6 (1), 102-110.
4. Basolo, V., & Huang, C. (2001). Cities and economic development: Does the city limits story still apply? Economic Development Quarterly, 15 (4), 327-339.
5. Bassett, E. M. (2006). "This land is our land?" An analysis of land-use planning and cooperation under Michigan's conditional land transfer act. State and Local Government Review, 38 (1), 23-33.
6. Bickers, K. N., Stein, R. M., & Post, S. (2006). The Political Market for Intergovernmental Cooperation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31 - September 3, Philadelphia.
7. Blair, J. P., Staley, S. R., & Zhang, Z. (1996). The central city elasticity hypothesis: A critical appraisal of Rusk's theory of urban development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 345-354.
8. Buettner, T. (2001). Local business taxation and competition for capital: The choice of the tax rate. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31 (2-3), 215-245.
9. Cable, G., Feiock, R., & Kim, J. (1993). The consequences of institutionalized access for economic development policy making in U.S. cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 7 (1), 91-97.
10. Carr, J. B., & Feiock, R. C. (1999). Metropolitan government and economic development. Urban Affairs Review, 34 (3), 476-488.
11. Carr, J. B., Bae, S., & Lu, W. (2006). City-county government and promises of economic development: A tale of two cities. State and Local Government Review, 38 (3), 259-69
12. Chen, Y., & Thurmaier, K. (2008). Interlocal agreements as collaborations: An empirical investigation of impetuses, norms, and success. The American Review of Public Administration. Pre-published October, 10, 2008, DOI: 10.1177/0275074008324566
13. Chrislip, D. D., & Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Clarke, S. E., & Gaile, G. L. (1998). The work of cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15. Clingermayer, J., & Feiock, R. C. (1990). The adoption of four economic development policies in large cities. Policy Studies Journal, 18, 539-52.
16. Clingermayer, J. C., & Feiock, R. C. (2001). Institutional constraints and policy choice: An Exploration of Local Governance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
17. Frant, H. (1993). Rules and governance in the public sector: The case of civil service. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 990-1007.
18. Frant, H. (1996). High-powered and low-powered incentives in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 365-381.
19. Feiock, R. (2004). Introduction: Regionalism and institutional collective action. In Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
20. Feiock, R.C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29 (1), 47-63.
21. Feiock, R. C., & Clingermayer, J. C. (1986). Municipal representation, executive power, and economic development policy activity. Policy Studies Journal, 15 (2), 211-229.
22. Feiock, R. C., & Clingermayer, J. C. (1992). Development policy choice: Four explanations for city implementation of economic development policies. American Review of Public Administration, 22 (1), 49-63.
23. Feiock, R. C., & Kim, J. (2000). Form of government, administrative organization, and local economic development policy. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 11(1), 29-49.
24. Feiock, R. C., Jeong, M., & Kim, J. (2003). Credible commitment and council-manager government: Implications for policy instrument choices. Public Administration Review, 63 (5), 616-625.
25. Feiock, R. C., Moon, M. J., & Park, H. J. (2008). Is the world 'flat,' or 'spiky'? Rethinking the governance implications of globalization for economic development. Public Administration Review (January/February): 67, 24-35.
26. Feiock, R. C., Steinacker, A., & Park, H. J. (2009). Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures. Public Administration Review, March/April, 256-270.
27. Frederickson, H. G. (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science & Politics, 32, 701-711.
28. Frederickson, H. G., Johnson, G. A., & Wood, C. H. (2004). The adapted city: Institutional dynamics and structural change. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
29. Gainsborough, J. F. (2002). Slow growth and urban sprawl: Support for a new regional agenda? Urban Affairs Review, 37 (5), 728-744.
30. Gillette, C. P. (2001). Regionalization and interlocal bargains. New York University Law Review, 76, 190-271.
31. Goetz, E., & Kayser, T. (1993). Competition and cooperation in economic development: A study of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Economic Development Quarterly, 7 (1), 63-78.
32. Green, G. P., & Fleischmann, A. (1991). Promoting economic development: A comparison of central cities, suburbs, and nonmetropolitan communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27 (1), 145-154.
33. Hawkins, C. V. (2009). Prospects for and barriers to local government joint ventures. State and Local Government Review, 41(2), 108-119.
34. Hawkins, C. V. (2010). Cooperation and competition: Joint ventures for economic development. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 253-275.
35. Immergluck, D. W. (1993). The role of public infrastructure in urban economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 7 (3), 310-318.
36. Johnson, M., & Neiman, M. (2004). Courting business: Competition for economic development among cities. In Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition and cooperation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
37. Krueger, S., & McGuire, M. (2005). A transaction costs explanation of interlocal government collaboration. Paper presented at the Eighth National Public Management Research Conference, September 29-October 1, 2005, Los Angeles.
38. Lackey, S.B., Freshwater, D., & Rupasingha, A. (2002). Factors influencing local government cooperation in rural areas: Evidence from the Tennessee Valley. Economic Development Quarterly, 16 (2), 138-154.
39. Lewis, P. G. (1996). Shaping suburbia: How political institutions organize urban development. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
40. Longoria, T. (1994). Empirical analysis of the city limits typology. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30, 102-113.
41. Lyons, W., & Scheb, J. M. (1998). Saying "no" one more time: The rejection of consolidated government in Knox County, Tennessee. State and Local Government Review, 30 (2), 92-105.
42. Man, J. Y. (1999). Fiscal pressure, tax competition, and the adoption of tax increment financing, Urban Studies, 36 (7), 1151-67.
43. Mills, E., & Lubuele, L. S. (2000). Projecting growth of metropolitan areas. In R. Wassmer (Ed.), Readings in urban economics: Issues and public policy (pp. 36-55). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
44. Morgan, D. R., & Watson, S. S. (1995). The effects of mayoral power on urban fiscal policy. Policy Studies Journal, 23 (2), 231-243.
45. National Council for Economic Development. (1995). Trends in economic development organizations: A survey of selected metropolitan areas. Washington, DC: National Council for Economic Development.
46. Nunn, S., & Rosentraub, M. S. (1997). Dimensions of interjurisdictional cooperation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63 (3), 205-219.
47. Oakerson, R. J. (2004). The study of metropolitan governance. In Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
48. Olberding, J. C. (2002). Diving into the "third waves" of regional governance and economic development strategies: A study of regional partnerships for economic development in U.S. metropolitan areas.Economic Development Quarterly, 16 (3), 251-272.
49. Olberding, J. C. (2009). Toward evaluating the effectiveness of regional partnerships for economic development in U.S. metropolitan areas. International Journal of Public Administration, 32 (5), 393-414.
50. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
51. Pack, J. R. (2005). Metropolitan development: Patterns, problems, causes, policy proposals. In Sunbelt-Frostbelt. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
52. Parks, R. B., & Oakerson, R. (1989). Metropolitan organization and governance: A local economy approach. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 25 (1), 18-29.
53. Pelissero, J. P., & Fasenfeset, D. (1989). A typology of suburban economic development policy orientations. Economic Development Quarterly, 3 (4), 301-311.
54. Peterson, P. E. (1981). The city limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
55. Pierce, N. (1993). Citistates: How urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.
56. Pierce, N. (1993). Citistates: How urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.
57. Post, S. S. (2002, September). Local Government Cooperation: The Relationship between Metropolitan Area Government Geography and Service Provision. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
58. Post, S. S. (2004). Metropolitan area governance and institutional collective action. In Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
59. Reynolds, L. (2003). Intergovernmental cooperation, metropolitan equity, and the new regionalism. Washington Law Review, 78, 93-160.
60. Rubin, H. J. (1986). Local economic development organizations and the activities of small cities in encouraging growth. Policy Studies Journal, 14 (3), 363-388.
61. Rubin, I, S., & Rubin, H. J. (1987). Economic development incentives: The poor (cities) pay more. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23 (1), 37-62.
62. Rusk, D. (1993). Cities without Suburbs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press
63. Saiz, M. (1999). Mayoral perceptions of developmental and redistributive policies: A cross-national perspective. Urban Affairs Review, 34 (6), 820-842.
64. Savitch, H. V., & Vogel, R. (2000). Paths to new regionalism. State and Local Government Review, 32 (3), 158-168
65. Savitch, H. V., Collins, D., Sanders, D., & Markham, P. J. (1993). Ties that bind: Central cities, suburbs and the new metropolitan region. Economic Development Quarterly, 7 (1), 341-357.
66. Schneider, M. (1989). The competitive city: The political economy of suburbia. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
67. Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1993). The antigrowth entrepreneur: Challenging the "equilibrium" of the growth machine. The Journal of Politics, 55(3), 720-736.
68. Shanahan, M., & Williams, B. (1990). Multiple tax base sharing agreements: The city of Barberton and the city of Norton. In Jack Dustin et al. (Eds.), Tax-base sharing: An evolution of its uses and potential in the state of Ohio (pp. 23-39).
69. Sharp, E. B. (1991). Institutional manifestations of accessibility and urban economic development policy. The Western Political Quarterly, 44 (1), 129-147.
70. Sigelman, L., & Willnat, L. (2000). Attitudinal differentiation between African-American urbanites and suburbanites. Urban Affairs Review, 35, 677-694.
71. Stein, R. M. (1990). Urban alternatives: Public and private markets in the provision of local services. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
72. Steinacker, A. (2002). The use of bargaining games in local development policy. The Review of Policy Research, 19(4), 120-153.
73. Steinacker, A. (2004). Game theoretic models of metropolitan cooperation. In Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition and Cooperation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
74. Steinacker, A. (2010). The institutional collective action perspective on self-organizing mechanisms: Market failures and transaction cost problems. In Self-Organizing Federalism: Collaborative Mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
75. Taylor, G. D., & Bassett, E. (2007). Exploring boundaries in governance: Intergovernmental boundary agreements. State and Local Government Review, 39 (3), 119-30.
76. Thurmaier, K., & Wood, C. (2002). Interlocal agreements as overlapping social networks: Picket fence regionalism in metropolitan Kansas City. Public Administration Review, 62 (5), 585-598.
77. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64 (5), 416-424.
78. Weir, M. (2000). Coalition building for regionalism. In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on Regionalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
79. Wood, C. (2006). Scope and patterns of metropolitan governance in urban America: Probing the complexities in the Kansas City region. The American Review of Public Administration, 36 (3), 337-353.
80. Zeemering, E. S. (2008). Negotiation and noncooperation: Debating Michigan's conditional land transfer agreement. State and Local Government Review, 40 (1), 1-11.