Newly developed haptic forceps enables sensitive, real-time measurements of organ elasticity

Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 177-183

  Atsuta, Koji ^a   Ozawa, Soji ^b   Shimojima, Naoki ^c   Shimono, Tomoyuki ^c   Susa, Shigeru ^c   Takei, Takayoshi ^c   Ohnishi, Kouhei ^c   Morikawa, Yasuhide ^c  

^a FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b TOKAI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Elasticity; Endoscopic surgery; Haptics; Rat; Robot

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ELASTICITY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FORCEPS; HAPTIC FORCEPS; MALE; NONHUMAN; ORGAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROBOTICS; SAFETY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ELASTICITY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; LAPAROSCOPY; PALPATION; RATS; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77952925252     PISSN: 13645706     EISSN: 13652931     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13645701003644053     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Mouret P. How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1996;25:744-747
2. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988; 35:153-160
3. Satava R. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: A personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12:6-16.
4. Schurr MO, Breitwieser H, Melzer A, Kunert W, Schmitt M, Voges U, et al. Experimental telemanipulation in endoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6:167-175
5. Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisius B, Voges U. Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. A review of the ARTEMIS project. Advanced Robotic Telemanipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:375-381
6. Taylor RH, Funda J, Eldridge B, Gomory S, Gruben K, LaRose D, et al. A telerobotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Eng Med Biol. 1995;14:279-288
7. Ballantyne GH, Moll F. The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:1293-1304
8. Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK Jr. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg. 2004;188:2S-15S.
9. Hanly EJ, Talamini MA. Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg. 2004;188:19S-26S.
10. Katsura S, Iida W, Ohnishi K. Medical Mechatronics - An Application to Haptic Forceps. IFAC Annu Rev Contr. 2005;29:237-245
11. Shimono T, Katsura S, Ohnishi K. Abstraction and reproduction of force sensation from real environment by bilateral control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2007;54: 907-918 (Pubitemid 46603381)
12. Louw DF, Fielding T, McBeth PB, Gregoris D, Newhook P, Sutherland GR. Surgical robotics: a review and neurosurgical prototype development. Neurosurgery 2004;54:525-537
13. Srinivasan MA, Basdogan C. Haptics in virtual environments: taxonomy, research status, and challenges. Comput Graph. 1997;21:393-404.
14. Tropskaya NS, Popova TS, Solov'eva GI. Effect of drugs with various mechanisms of action on propulsive activity of the small intestine. Bull Exp Biol Med 2005;140: 268-270
15. Sirakov V, Krastev A, Kostadinova I, Turiiski V. Neostigmine, but not metoclopramide, abolishes ethosuximide-induced functional gastrointestinal disturbances. Pharmacology 2005; 75:187-194
16. Mahvash M. A novel approach for modeling separation forces between deformable bodies. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006;10:618-626
17. Duriez C, Dubois F, Kheddar A, Andriot C. Realistic haptic rendering of interacting deformable objects in virtual environments. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2006;12:36-47.
18. McColl R, Brown AP, Seligman C, Lim F, Alsaraira A. Haptic rendering & perception studies for laparoscopic surgery simulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:833-836