Rebuilding roombeek: Patterns of citizen participation in urban governance

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 583-607

  Denters, Bas ^a   Klok, Pieter Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Citizen governance; Institutional embedding of public participation; Representative bias of political participation; Urban reconstruction

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INNER CITY AREA; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PLANNING PROCESS; POLICY MAKING; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLITICS;

ENSCHEDE; NETHERLANDS; OVERIJSSEL;

EID: 77952903905     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087409356756     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. Ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216-24.
2. Berry, J.M., K.E. Portney, and K. Thomson. 1993. The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3. Birch, A.H. 1993. The concepts and theories of modern democracies. London: Routledge.
4. Box, R.C. 1998. Citizen governance: Leading American communities into the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Brady, H.E., S. Verba, and K.L. Schlozman. 1995. Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review 89:271-94.
6. Dahl, R.A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
7. Denters, S.A.H., and P.J. Klok 2003. Rebuilding Roombeek: An institutional analysis of interactive governance in the context of representative democracy. In The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets: A comparison of the Dutch experience with the developments in four Western countries, edited by B. Denters, O. van Heffen, J. Huisman, and P. J. Klok, 91-110. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Denters, B., and L. E. Rose, eds. 2005. Comparing local governance: Trends and developments. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
9. Denters, B., O. Van Heffen, J. Huisman, and P.J. Klok. 2003a. Introduction: The emergence of new forms of governance. In The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets: A comparison of the Dutch experience with the developments in four Western countries, edited by B. Denters, O. van Heffen, J. Huisman, and P. J. Klok, 3-14. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Denters, B., O. Van Heffen, J. Huisman, and P. J. Klok, eds. 2003b. The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets: A comparison of the Dutch experience with the developments in four Western countries. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
11. Dryzek, J.S., and S. Niemeyer. 2008. Discursive representation. American Political Science Review 102 (4): 481-93.
12. Edelenbos, J. 2005. Institutional implications of interactive governance: Insights from Dutch practice. Governance 18 (1): 111-34.
13. Edelenbos, J., and E.H. Klijn. 2006. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 417-46.
14. Edelenbos, J., P.J. Klok, and J. van Tatenhove. 2009. The institutional embedding of interactive policy making: Insights from a comparative research based on eight interactive projects in the Netherlands. American Review of Public Administration 39 (2): 125-48.
15. Fiorina, M.P. 1999. Extreme voices: A dark side of civic engagement. In Civic engagement in American democracy, edited by T. Skocpol, 395-425. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16. Fung, A. 2004. Empowered participation. Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
17. Hajer, M.A. 2005. Rebuilding Ground Zero. The politics of performance. Planning Theory & Practice 6 (4): 445-64.
18. John, P. 2009. Can citizen governance redress the representative bias of political participation? Public Administration Review 69 (3): 494-503.
19. Judge, D. 1999. Representation: Theory and practice in Britain. London: Routledge.
20. Kates, R.W., C.E. Colten, S. Laska, and S.P. Leatherman. 2006. Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (40): 14653-60.
21. Klok, P.J., B. Denters, O. Van Heffen, and M. Visser. 2004. Monitor participatieproces voor de wederopbouw van Roombeek. Resultaten en conclusies. Enschede, Netherlands: KISS.
22. Lowndes, V., L. Pratchett, and G. Stoker. 2006 Diagnosing and remedying the failings of official participation schemes: The CLEAR framework. Social Policy and Society 5 (2): 281-91.
23. Lowndes, V., G. Stoker, L. Pratchett, D. Wilson, S. Leach, and M. Wingfield. 1998. Enhancing public participation in local government: A research report. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
24. Mansbridge, J. 1999. On the idea that participation makes better citizens. In Citizen competence and democratic institutions, edited by S. L. Elkin and K. E. Soltan, 291-325. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
25. Olshansky, R.B. 2006. Planning after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (2): 147-53.
26. Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker. 1994. Rules, games and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
27. Parry, G., G. Moyser, and N. Day. 1992. Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
28. Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
29. Rosenstone, S., and J. Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, participation and American democracy. New York: Macmillan.
30. Ross, B.H., and M.A. Levine. 1996. Urban politics: Power in metropolitan America. 5th ed. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
31. Schattschneider, E.E. 1975. The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
32. Sirianni, C., and L. Friedland. 2001. Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy and the movement for civic renewal. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
33. Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in movement: social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
34. Van de Peppel, R.A., and M.T. Prummel. 2000. De selectiviteit van interactief beleid. Bestuurskunde 9:15-24.
35. Verba, S., and N.H. Nie. 1987. Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
36. Verba, S., N.H. Nie, and J.O. Kim. 1978. Participation and political equality: A seven nation comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
37. Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, and H.E. Brady. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
38. Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, H. Brady, and N.H. Nie. 1993. Citizen activity: Who participates? What do they say? American Political Science Review 87 (2): 303-18.
39. Wigboldus, J.N. 2005. Respect voor het verleden, ruimte voor de toekomst: Lessen van het wederopbouwproces in Roombeek, Enschede (2000-2004). Den Haag, Netherlands: VNG Uitgeverij.
40. Wille, A. 2001. Politieke participatie en representativiteit in het interactieve beleidsproces. In Lokale interactieve beleidsvorming: Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de consequenties van interactieve beleidsvorming voor het functioneren van de lokale democratie, edited by J. Edelenbos and R. Monnikhof, 87-115. Utrecht, Netherlands: Lemma.