A comprehensive test of the 'limiting resources' framework applied to plant tolerance to apical meristem damage

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 359-369

  Banta, Joshua A ^a   Stevens, Martin H H ^b   Pigliucci, Massimo ^c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FITNESS; FRUIT PRODUCTION; HERB; INJURY; LATITUDINAL GRADIENT; LIMITING FACTOR; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; SOIL NUTRIENT; TOLERANCE;

EUROPE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 77952897816     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17726.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abrahamson W G, Weis A E. Evolutionary ecology across three trophic levels: goldenrods, gallmakers and natural enemies 1997, Princeton Univ. Press
2. Agrawal A A. Overcompensation of plants in response to herbivory and the by-product benefits of mutualism. Trends Plant Sci 2000, 5:309-313.
3. Anderson M, Roberts J A. Arabidopsis 1998, Sheffield Academic Press
4. Handling Arabidopsis plants and seeds 2008, Columbus, OH, . Accessed on 14 April 2008.
5. Banta J A, Pigliucci M. Effects of gibberellin mutations on tolerance to apical meristem damage in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 2005, 94:229-236.
6. Banta J A. Evidence of local adaptation to coarse-grained environmental variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 2007, 61:2419-2432.
7. Belsky A J. Does herbivory benefit plants? A review of the evidence. Am. Nat 1986, 127:870-892.
8. Belsky A J. Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring? Evol. Ecol 1993, 7:109-121.
9. Benner B L. Effects of apex removal and nutrient supplementation on branching and seed production in Thlaspi arvense (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot 1988, 75:645-651.
10. Bergelson J, Crawley M J. Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: the disadvantages of being eaten. Am. Nat 1992a, 139:870-882.
11. Bergelson J, Crawley M J. The effects of grazers on the performance of individuals and populations of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 1992b, 90:435-444.
12. Bergelson J. Regrowth following herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: compensation but not overcompensation. Am. Nat 1996, 148:744-755.
13. Bossdorf O. Reduced competitive ability in an invasive plant. Ecol. Lett 2004, 7:346-353.
14. Dillon W R, Goldstein M. Multivariate analysis: methods and applications 1984, Wiley
15. Donohue K. Germination timing influences natural selection on life-history characters in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 2002, 83:1006-1016.
16. Griffith C. Life-history variation and adaptation in the historically mobile plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) in North America. Am. J. Bot 2004, 91:837-849.
17. Hanley M E, Fegan E L. Timing of cotyledon damage affects growth and flowering in mature plants. Plant Cell Environ 2007, 30:812-819.
18. Hawkes C V, Sullivan J J. The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 2001, 82:2045-2058.
19. Hilbert D W. Relative growth-rates and the herbivore optimization hypothesis. Oecologia 1981, 51:14-18.
20. Hochwender C G. The potential for and constraints on the evolution of compensatory ability in Asclepias syriaca. Oecologia 1999, 122:361-370.
21. Huhta A-P. Tolerance of Gentianella campestris in relation to damage intensity: an interplay between apical dominance and herbivory. Evol. Ecol 2000a, 14:373-392.
22. Huhta A-P. A test of the compensatory continuum: fertilization increases and belowground competition decreases the grazing tolerance of tall wormseed mustard (Erysimum strictum). Evol. Ecol 2000b, 14:353-372.
23. Juenger T, Bergelson J. Does early season browsing influence the effects of self-pollination in scarlet gilia? Ecology 2000, 81:41-48.
24. Juenger T, Lennartsson T. Tolerance in plant ecology and evolution: toward a more unified theory of plant herbivore interactions. Evol. Ecol 2000, 14:283-287.
25. Juenger T. The evolution of tolerance to damage in Gentianella campestris: natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evol. Ecol 2000, 14:393-419.
26. Krysan P J. T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 1999, 11:2283-2290.
27. Lennartsson T. Evidence for an evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). Am. Nat 1997, 149:1147-1155.
28. Lennartsson T. Induction of overcompensation in the field gentain, Gentianella campestris. Ecology 1998, 79:1061-1072.
29. Marquis R J. The selective impact of herbivores. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution and genetics 1992, 301-325. Fritz R SSimms E L. Chicago Univ. Press
30. Marshall C B, Avila-Sakar G. Effect of nutrient and CO2 availability on tolerance to herbivory in Brassica rapa. Plant Ecol 2008, 196:1-13.
31. Maschinski J, Whitham T G. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am. Nat 1989, 134:1-19.
32. Mauricio R. Natural selection and the joint evolution of tolerance and resistance as plant defenses. Evol. Ecol 2000, 14:491-507.
33. Mauricio R. Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 1997, 78:1301-1311.
34. Mitchell-Olds T, Schmitt J. Genetic mechanisms and evolutionary significance of natural variation in Arabidopsis. Nature 2006, 441:947-952.
35. Mopper S. A new look at habitat structure: consequences of herbivore-modified plant architecture. Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space 1991, 260-280. Bell S S. Chapman and Hall
36. Moran M D. Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 2003, 100:403-405.
37. Muth N Z, Pigliucci M. Implementation of a novel framework for assessing species plasticity in biological invasions: responses of Centaurea and Crepis to phosphorus and water availability. J. Ecol 2007, 95:1001-1013.
38. Napp-Zinn K. Arabidopsis thaliana. CRC handbook of flowering 1985, 492-503. Halevy A. CRC Press
39. Paige K N. Herbivory and Ipomosis aggregata: differences in response, differences in experimental protocol: a reply to Bergelson and Crawley. Am. Nat 1994, 143:739-749.
40. Paige K N. Regrowth following ungulate herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: geographic evidence for overcompensation. Oecologia 1999, 118:316-323.
41. Paige K N, Whitham T G. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am. Nat 1987, 129:407-416.
42. Painter R. Resistance of plants to insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol 1958, 3:267-290.
43. Pang P P, Meyerowitz E M. Arabidopsis thaliana: a model system for plant molecular biology. Bio/Tech 1987, 5:1177-1181.
44. Pigliucci M. Ecology and evolutionary biology of Arabidopsis. The Arabidopsis book. Am. Soc. Plant Biol 2002a, Meyerowitz ESomerville C.
45. Pigliucci M. Are ecology and evolutionary biology " soft" sciences? Ann. Zool. Fenn 2002b, 39:87-98.
46. Rausher M D. Natural selection and the evolution of plant-animal interactions. Insect and chemical ecology: an evolutionary approach 1992, 20-88. Roitberg B DIsman M S. Chapman and Hall
47. Rautio P. Overcompensation and adaptive plasticity of apical dominance in Erysimum strictum (Brassicaceae) in response to simulated browsing and resource availability. Oikos 2005, 111:179-191.
48. Simms E L. Defining tolerance as a norm of reaction. Evol. Ecol 2000, 14:563-570.
49. Sokal R R, Rohlf F J. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 1995, Freeman and Company
50. Somers K M. Allometry, isometry and shape in principal components analysis. Syst. Zool 1989, 38:169-173.
51. Stowe K A. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 2000, 31:565-595.
52. Suwa T, Maherali H. Influence of nutrient availability on the mechanisms of tolerance to herbivory in an annual grass, Avena barbata (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot 2008, 95:434-440.
53. Tiffin P. Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionary and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivory? Am. Nat 2000, 155:128-138.
54. Tiffin P, Rausher M. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. Am. Nat 1999, 154:700-716.
55. Tuomi J. Plant compensatory responses: bud dormancy as an adaptation to herbivory. Ecology 1994, 75:1429-1436.
56. van der Meijden E. Defense and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 1988, 51:355-363.
57. Weinig C. Evolutionary genetics of resistance and tolerance to natural herbivory in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 2003, 57:1270-1280.
58. Westerman J M, Lawrence M J. Genotype-environment interaction and developmental regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. 1. Inbred lines: description. Heredity 1970, 25:609-627.
59. Wise M J, Abrahamson W G. Beyond the compensatory continuum: environmental resource levels and plant tolerance of herbivory. Oikos 2005, 109:417-428.
60. Wise M J, Abrahamson W G. Effects of resource availability on tolerance to herbivory: a review and assessment of three opposing models. Am. Nat 2007, 169:443-454.
61. Wise M J, Abrahamson W G. Applying the limiting resources model to plant tolerance of apical meristem damage. Am. Nat 2008, 172:635-647.