Anisotropy of environmental perception caused by spatial changes during locomotion

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 258-266

  Inagami, Makoto ^a   Ohno, Ryuzo ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ecological approach; Enclosure; Environmental perception; Locomotion

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952887155     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: 15229610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Benedikt M.L. To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B 1979, 6:47-65.
2. Benedikt M.L., Burnham C.A. Perceiving architectural space: from optic arrays to isovists. Persistence and change: Proceedings of the first international conference on event perception 1985, 103-114. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey. W.H. Warren, R.E. Shaw (Eds.).
3. Brooks R.A. New approaches to robotics. Science 1991, 253:1227-1232.
4. Brunswik E. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments 1956, University of California Press, Berkeley.
5. Clark A. An embodied cognitive science?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3(9):345-351.
6. Cullen G. The concise townscape 1971, Architectural Press, London.
7. Dainoff M.J., Sherman R.C., Miskie D., Grovesnor J. Perceived enclosedness of shematic architectural space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7(6):1349-1356.
8. Gärling T. Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1969, 10:250-256.
9. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
10. Gifford R. Environmental psychology: Principles and practice 2002, Optimal Books, Colville, Washington. 3rd ed.
11. Hayward S.C., Franklin S.S. Perceived openness-enclosure of architectural space. Environment and Behavior 1974, 6(1):37-52.
12. Heft H. An examination of constructivist and Gibsonian approaches to environmental psychology. Population and Environment 1981, 4(4):227-245.
13. Heft H. Way-finding as the perception of information. Population and Environment 1983, 6(3):133-150.
14. Heft H. Affordances and the body: an intentional analysis of Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 1989, 19(1):1-30.
15. Heft H. A methodological note on overestimates of reaching distance: distinguishing between perceptual and analytical judgments. Ecological Psychology 1993, 5(3):255-271.
16. Heft H. The ecological approach to navigation: a Gibsonian perspective. The construction of cognitive maps 1996, 105-132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. J. Portugali (Ed.).
17. Heft H. The relevance of Gibson's ecological approach to perception for environment-behavior studies. Advances in environment, behavior, and design 1997, Vol. 4:71-108. Plenum Press, New York. G.T. Moore, R.W. Marans (Eds.).
18. Heft H. Ecological psycholgy in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism 2001, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.
19. Heft H. Affordances, dynamic experience, and the challenge of reification. Ecological Psychology 2003, 15(2):149-180.
20. Heft, H. The participatory character of landscape. In C. W. Thompson, P. Aspinall, & S. Bell (Eds.), Open space: People space 2: Innovative approaches to research excellence in landscape and health. Abingdon, UK: Taylor and Francis, in press.
21. Heft H., Nasar J.L. Evaluating environmental scenes using dynamic versus static displays. Environment and Behavior 2000, 32(3):301-322.
22. Heft, H., & Poe, G. (2005). Pragmatism, environmental aesthetics, and the spectator approach to visual perception. In Paper Presented at the Meetings of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
23. Inagami M., Ohno R., Tsujiuchi R. Phenomenal awareness of the surrounding space: an ecological perspective. Ninchi-kagaku [Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society] 2008, 15(1):134-143.
24. Ittelson W.H. Environment perception and contemporary perceptual theory. Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings 1976, 141-154. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. 2nd ed. H.M. Proshansky, W.H. Ittelson, L.G. Rivlin (Eds.).
25. James W. The principles of psychology 1890/1950a, Vol. 1. Dover Publications, New York.
26. James W. The principles of psychology 1890/1950b, Vol. 2. Dover Publications, New York.
27. Landwehr K. Environmental perception: an ecological perspective. Environmental perspectives 1988, 18-38. Avebury, Aldershot, England. D. Canter, M. Krampen, D. Stea (Eds.).
28. May M. Ambient environmental stimulation in imagery and cognition. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 2003, 23:155-161.
29. Ohno R. Ambient vision of the environmental perception: describing ambient visual information. Healthy environments: Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the environmental design research association 1991, 237-245. Environmental Design Research Association, Oklahoma City. J. Urbina-Soria, P. Ortega-Andeane, R. Bechtel (Eds.).
30. Ohno R., Tsujiuchi R., Inagami M. Okugai-kukan deno ido ni tomonai henka suru kankaku no renzokuteki-hyoteiho. Nihon Kenchiku Gakkai Keikakukei Ronbunshu [Journal of Architecture and Planning: Transactions of AIJ] 2003, 570:65-69.
31. Pedersen D.M., Topham T.L. Perception of enclosure effects of architectural surfaces in a large scale interior space. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1990, 70:299-304.
32. Reed E.S. Space perception and the psychologist's fallacy in James's principles. Reflections on the principles of psychology: William James after a century 1990, 231-247. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey. M.G. Johnson, T.B. Henley (Eds.).
33. Ross H.E. Behaviour and perception in strange environments 1974, Allen and Unwin, London.
34. Stamps A.E. Enclosure and safety in urban scapes. Environment and Behavior 2005, 37(1):102-133.
35. Stamps A.E. Visual permeability, locomotive permiability, safety, and enclosure. Environment and Behavior 2005, 37(5):587-619.
36. Stamps A.E. Isovists, enclosure, and perpeability theory. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2005, 32:735-762.
37. Stamps A.E., Smith S.G. Environmental enclosure in urban areas. Environment and Behavior 2002, 34(6):781-794.
38. Thiel P. Notes on the description, scaling, notation, and scoring of some perceptual and cognitive attributes of the physical environment. Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting 1970, 593-619. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. H.M. Proshansky, W.H. Ittelson, L.G. Rivlin (Eds.).
39. Thiel P., Harrison E.D., Alden R.S. The perception of spatial enclosure as a function of the position of architectural surfaces. Environment and Behavior 1986, 18(2):227-245.
40. Wiener J.M., Franz G. Isovists as a means to predict spatial experience and behavior. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2005, 3343:42-57.
41. Wiener J.M., Franz G., Rossmanith N., Reichelt A., Mallot H.A., Bülthoff H.H. Isovist analysis captures properties of space relevant for locomotion and experience. Perception 2007, 36(7):1066-1083.