Visual permeability, locomotive permeability, safety, and enclosure

Environment and Behavior

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 587-619

  Stamps III, Arthur E ^a  

^a Institute of Environmental Quality   (United States)

Author keywords

Enclosure; Permeability; Safety

Indexed keywords

SAFETY; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 25444527942     PISSN: 00139165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013916505276741     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape (Rev. ed.). New York: John Wiley.
2. Boissy, A. (1995). Fear and fearlessness in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 70, 165-191.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1993). Applied regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
6. Feimer, N. R. (1984). Environmental perception: The effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 61-80.
7. Fisher, B. S., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features prospect, refuge, and escape. Environment and Behavior 24, 35-65.
8. Gärling, T. (1969a). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms I: Judgment scales of open and closed space. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 10, 250-256.
9. Gärling, T. (1969b). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms II: Judgments of open and closed space by category rating and magnitude estimation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 10, 257-268.
10. Gärling, T. (1970a). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms III: A relation between judged depth and size of space. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 124-131.
11. Gärling, T. (1970b). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms IV. The relation of judged depth to judged size of space under different viewing conditions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 133-145.
12. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books.
13. Hanyu, K. (1997). Visual properties and affective appraisals in residential areas after dark. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 301-315.
14. Hayward, S. C., & Franklin, S. S. (1974). Perceived openness-enclosure of architectural space. Environment and Behavior, 6, 37-52.
15. Hediger, H. (1964). Wild animals in captivity: An outline of the biology of zoological gardens (G. Sircom, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1950)
16. Hediger, H. (1968). The psychology and behaviour of animals in zoos and circuses (G. Sircom, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1955)
17. Herzog, T. R., & Chernick, K. K. (2000). Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 29-39.
18. Herzog, T. R., & Flynn-Smith, J. A. (2001). Preference and perceived danger as a function of the perceived curvature, length, and width of urban alleys. Environment and Behavior, 33, 653-666.
19. Herzog, T. R., & Kutzli, G. E. (2002). Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings. Environment and Behavior, 34, 819-835.
20. Herzog, T. R., & Miller, E. J. (1998). The role of mystery in perceived danger and environmental preference. Environment and Behavior 30, 429-449.
21. Herzog, T. R., & Smith, G. A. (1988). Danger, mystery, and environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 20, 320-344.
22. Hinde, R. A. (1998). Humans and human habitats: Reciprocal influences. In B. Cartledge (Ed.), Mind, brain, and the environment (pp. 6-27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous univariate distributions: Volume 2. New York: John Wiley.
24. Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., & Sullivan, W. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30, 28-59.
25. Loewen, L. J., Steel, G. D., & Suedfeld, P. (1993). Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 323-331.
26. Montgomery, D. C. (1997). Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley.
27. Nasar, J. L., & Fisher, B. S. (1993). "Hot spots" of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 187-206.
28. Nasar, J. L., Fisher, B. S., & Grannis, M. (1993). Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 161-178.
29. Nasar, J. L., & Jones, K. M. (1997). Landscapes of fear and stress. Environment and Behavior 29, 291-323.
30. Nasar, J. L., Julian, D., Buchman, S., Humphreys, D., & Mrohaly, M. (1983). The emotional quality of scenes and observation points: A look at prospect and refuge. Landscape Planning, 10, 355-361.
31. Öhman, A. (1986). Face the beast and fear the face: Animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analysis of emotion. Psychophysiology, 23, 123-145.
32. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1988). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Russell, P. A. (1979). Fear-evoking stimuli. In W. Sluckin (Ed.), Fear in animals and man (pp. 86-124). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
35. Schroeder, H. W., & Anderson, L. M. (1984). Perception of personal safety in urban recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 178-194.
36. Shaffer, G. S., & Anderson, L. M. (1983). Perceptions of the security and attractiveness of urban parking lots. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 311-323.
37. Simpson, J. (1997). The compact edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Stamps, A. E. (1992). Bootstrap investigation of respondent sample size for environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 220-222.
39. Stamps, A. E. (1993). Simulation effects on environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 38, 115-132.
40. Stamps, A. E. (1997). A paradigm for distinguishing significant from non-significant visual impacts: Theory, implementation, case histories. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 17, 249-293.
41. Stamps, A. E. (2000). Psychology and the aesthetics of the built environment. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
42. Stamps, A. E. (2003). Permeability and environmental enclosure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 1305-1310.
43. Stamps, A. E. (2005). Enclosure and safety in urbanscapes. Environment and Behavior, 37, 102-133.
44. Stamps, A. E., & Nasar, J. L. (1997). Design review and public preferences: Effects of geographical location, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 11-32.
45. Stamps, A. E., & Smith, S. G. (2002). Environmental enclosure in urban areas. Environment and Behavior, 34, 781-794.
46. Thiel, P., Harrison, E. D., & Alden, R. S. (1986). The perception of spatial enclosure as a function of the position of architectural spaces. Environment and Behavior 18, 227-245.
47. Warr, M. (1990). Dangerous situations: Social context and fear of victimization. Social Forces, 68, 891-907.
48. Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.