The additional value of three time point color coding in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast for inexperienced and experienced readers

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 514-518

  Veltman, J ^a   Mann, R M ^a   Meijer, F J A ^a   Heesakkers, R A M ^a   Heufke, M ^a   Blickman, J G ^a   Boetes, C ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast; CAD; Dynamic; MRI

Indexed keywords

BREAST MRI; COLOR CODING; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; DYNAMIC DATA; DYNAMIC MRI; EVALUATION METHOD; KAPPA STATISTIC; ROC CURVES; TIME CURVES; TIME POINTS;

COLOR;

IMAGE CODING;

GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; KAPPA STATISTICS; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COLOR; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEGLUMINE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77952877555     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.053     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bluemke D.A., Gatsonis C.A., Chen M.H., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292 December (22) (2004) 2735-2742
2. Kuhl C.K., Schrading S., Bieling H.B., et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370 August (9586) (2007) 485-492
3. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., DeAngelis G.A., DeBruhl N., Harms S., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238 January (1) (2006) 42-53
4. Wedegartner U., Bick U., Wortler K., Rummeny E., and Bongartz G. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol 11 9 (2001) 1645-1650
5. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 April (1) (1999) 101-110
6. Fischer U., Zachariae O., Baum F., von Heyden D., Funke M., and Liersch T. The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14 October (10) (2004) 1725-1731
7. Furman-Haran E., Schechtman E., Kelcz F., Kirshenbaum K., and Degani H. Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vasculature in benign and malignant breast lesions. Cancer 104 August (4) (2005) 708-718
8. Kuhl C.K., Schild H.H., and Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236 September (3) (2005) 789-800
9. Degani H., Gusis V., Weinstein D., Fields S., and Strano S. Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med 3 July (7) (1997) 780-782
10. Kelcz F., Furman-Haran E., Grobgeld D., and Degani H. Clinical testing of high-spatial-resolution parametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. AJR (Am J Roentgenol) 179 December (6) (2002) 1485-1492
11. Kopans D.B. Mammographic follow-up to detect breast cancer recurrence after conservative treatment. Radiology 190 January (1) (1994) 286
12. Liberman L., Mason G., Morris E.A., and Dershaw D.D. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR (Am J Roentgenol) 186 February (2) (2006) 426-430
13. Kuhl C.K., Bieling H.B., Gieseke J., et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 203 April (1) (1997) 137-144
14. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (2003), American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
15. Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data 6. Biometrics 33 1 (1977) 159-174
16. Kurz K.D., Wittsack H.J., Willers R., Blondin D., Modder U., and Saleh A. Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?. Eur Radiol 17 December (12) (2007) 3093-3099
17. Lehman C.D., Peacock S., DeMartini W.B., and Chen X. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR (Am J Roentgenol) 187 July (1) (2006) 51-56
18. Wiener J.I., Schilling K.J., Adami C., and Obuchowski N.A. Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. AJR (Am J Roentgenol) 184 March (3) (2005) 878-886
19. Kurz K.D., Steinhaus D., Klar V., et al. Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast. Eur J Radiol November (2007)
20. Liney G.P., Sreenivas M., Gibbs P., Garcia-Alvarez R., and Turnbull L.W. Breast lesion analysis of shape technique: semiautomated vs. manual morphological description. J Magn Reson Imaging 23 April (4) (2006) 493-498