Influence of Using Manual or Automatic Breast Density Information in a Mass Detection CAD System

Academic Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 877-883

  Oliver, Arnau ^a   Lladó, Xavier ^a   Freixenet, Jordi ^a   Martí, Robert ^a   Pérez, Elsa ^b   Pont, Josep ^b   Zwiggelaar, Reyer ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL JOSEP TRUETA   (Spain)

^c ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

breast density; computer aided detection systems; Mammography; mass detection

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFIER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREND STUDY; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DENSITOMETRY; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DENSITOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952872949     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer: facts and figures. Atlanta (GA): 2007-08, ACS.
2. Eurostat. Health statistics atlas on mortality in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union (2002)
3. Sener S.F., Winchester D.J., Winchester D.P., et al. Survival rates for breast cancers detected in a community service screening mammogram program. Am J Surg 191 (2006) 406-409
4. Thurfjell E.L., Lernevall K.A., and Taube A.A.S. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 191 (1994) 241-244
5. Hendee W.R., Beam C., and Hendrick E. Proposition: all mammograms should be double-read. Med Phys 26 (1999) 115-118
6. Sickles E.A. Breast cancer screening outcomes in women ages 40-49: clinical experience with service screening using modern mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 (1997) 99-104
7. Bray F., McCarron P., and Parkin D.M. The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality. Breast Cancer Res 6 (2004) 229-239
8. Bird R.E., Wallace T.W., and Yankaskas B.C. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184 (1992) 613-617
9. Birdwell R.L., Ikeda D.M., O'Shaughnessy K.D., et al. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219 (2001) 192-202
10. Basset L.W., and Gold R.H. Breast cancer detection: mammograms and other methods in breast imaging (1987), Grune & Stratton, New York
11. Hall F.M., Storella J.M., Siverstond D.Z., et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 167 (1988) 353-358
12. Kuzmiak C.M., Millnamow G.A., Qaqish B., et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens. Acad Radiol 9 (2002) 1378-1382
13. R2 ImageChecker. Available online at: http://www.r2tech.com. Accessed June 6, 2009.
14. iCAD Second Look. Available online at: http://www.icadmed.com. Accessed June 6, 2009.
15. Ho W.T., and Lam P.W.T. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol 58 (2003) 133-136
16. Obenauer S., Sohns C., Werner C., et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography. J Digit Imaging 19 (2006) 258-263
17. Brem R.F., Hoffmeister J.W., Rapelyea J.A., et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 439-444
18. Wolfe J.N. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37 (1976) 2486-2492
19. Boyd N.F., Byng J.W., Jong R.A., et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87 (1995) 670-675
20. McCormack V.A., and dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidem Biomarkers Prev 15 (2006) 1159-1169
21. Freixenet J., Oliver A., Lladó X., et al. Eigendetection of masses considering false positive reduction and breast density information. Med Phys 35 (2008) 1840-1853
22. Tourassi G.D., Harrawood B., Singh S., et al. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms. Med Phys 34 (2007) 140-150
23. Varela C., Tahoces P.G., Méndez A.J., et al. Computerized detection of breast masses in digitized mammograms. Comp Biol Med 37 (2007) 214-226
24. Lladó X., Oliver A., Freixenet J., et al. A textural approach for mass false positive reduction in mammography. Comp Med Imag Graph 33 (2009) 415-422
25. Oliver A., Freixenet J., Martí R., et al. A novel breast tissue density classification methodology. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 12 (2008) 55-65
26. Quinlan J.R. Bagging, boosting, and C4.5. Nat Conf Artif Intell (1996) 725-730
27. Metz C.E. Evaluation of digital mammography by ROC analysis. Int Work Dig Mammogr (1996) 61-68
28. Lai S.M., Li X., and Bischof W.F. On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 8 (1989) 377-386
29. Kegelmeyer W.P., Pruneda J.M., Bourland P.D., et al. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191 (1994) 331-337
30. Chakraborty D.P. Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies. Acad Radiol 15 (2008) 1554-1566
31. Chakraborty D.P., and Berbaum K.S. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med Phys 31 (2004) 2313-2330