Stereologic analysis of bone produced by distraction osteogenesis or autogenous bone grafting in mandible

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 735-740

  Çakr Õzkan, Nilüfer ^a   Eyibilen, Ahmet ^b   Özkan, Fatih ^b   Özyurt, Birsen ^b   Aslan, Hüseyin ^b  

^a Departments of Otorhinolaryngology   (Turkey)

^b GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Autogenous bone graft; Mandibular defect; Transport distraction osteogenesis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BONE REMODELING; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CELL COUNT; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; HISTOLOGY; ILIAC BONE; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; OSTEOBLAST; SHEEP; TRANSPLANTATION;

ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CELL COUNT; DECALCIFICATION TECHNIQUE; ILIUM; MALE; MANDIBLE; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; SHEEP;

EID: 77952871982     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d7a49c     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Cascone P, Gennaro P, Spuntarelli G, et al. Mandibular distraction: evolution of treatment protocols in hemifacial microsomy. J Craniofac Surg 2005;16:563-571
2. McCarthy JG, Stelnicki EJ, Mehrara BJ, et al. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1812-1827
3. Sawaki Y, Hagino H, Yamamoto H, et al. Trifocal distraction osteogenesis for segmental mandibular defect: a technical innovation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:310-315
4. Kondoh T, Hamada Y, Kamei K, et al. Transport distraction osteogenesis following marginal resection of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:675-676
5. Henkel KO, Ma L, Lenz JH, et al. Closure of vertical alveolar bone defects with guided horizontal distraction osteogenesis: an experimental study in pigs and first clinical results. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:249-253
6. Perry M, Hodges N, Hallmon W, et al. Distraction osteogenesis versus auotogenous onlay grafting. Part I: outcome of implant integration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:695-702
7. Uçkan S, Veziroǧlu F, Dayangaç E. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation: technique, complications, and implant survival rates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:511-515
8. Cordora L, Amade DS, Cordro M. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implant Res 2002;13:103-111
9. Mazzonetto R, Allais D Maurette M. Radiographic evaluation of alveolar distraction osteogenesis: analysis of 60 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1708-1711
10. Bouletreau PJ, Warren SM, Longaker MT. The molecular biology of distraction osteogenesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002;30:1-11
11. Swennen G, Dempf R, Schliephake H. Cranio-facial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part II: experimental studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:123-135
12. Cheung LK, Zhang Q. Radiologic characterization of new bone generated from distraction after maxillary bone transport. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:234-242
13. Carlson ER. Distraction osteogenesis. In: Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen PE, Waite PD, eds. Peterson's Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. London: BC Decker Inc, 2004:1284-1289
14. Aslan H, Altunkaynak Z, Altunkaynak ME, et al. Effect of a high fat diet on quantitative features of adipocytes in the omentum: an experimental, stereological and ultrastructural study. Obes Surg 2006;16:1526-1534
15. Unal B, Bradley PM, Sahin B, et al. Estimation of numerical density and mean synaptic height in chick hippocampus 24 and 48 hours after passive avoidance training. Dev Brain Res 2002;136:135-144
16. Mayhew TM, Gunderse HJG. If you assume, you can make an ass out of you and me: a decade of the disector for stereological counting of particles in 3D space. J Anat 1996;188:1-15
17. Barone A, Crespi R, Aldini N, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation: histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:519-525
18. Hodges NE, Perry M, Mohamed W, et al. Distraction osteogenesis versus auotogenous onlay grafting. Part II: biology of regenerate and onlay bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:237-244
19. Ilizarov GA. Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 1990;250:8-26
20. Jazrawi LM, Majeska RJ, Klein ML, et al. Bone and cartilage formation in an experimental model of distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:111
21. Cheung LK, Zhang Q. Healing of maxillary alveolus in transport distraction osteogenesis for partial maxillectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:66-72
22. Kawaguchi H, Kurokawa T, Hanada K, et al. Stimulation of fracture repair by recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor in normal and streptozocin-diabetic rats. Endocrinology 1994;135:774-781
23. Johansson B, Grepe A, Wannfors K, et al. A clinical study of changes in the volume of bone grafts in the atrophic maxilla. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:157-161
24. Cope JB, Samchukov MI. Regenerate bone formation and remodeling during mandibular osteodistraction. Angle Orthod 2000;70:99-111
25. Hikiji H, Takato T, Matsumoto T, et al. Experimental study of reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint using a bone transport technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:1270-1276
26. Ilizarov GA. The tension stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part 1: the influence and stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;238-249